|
Should the Internet be regulated? Read before you vote.
With regulation we are seeing some file lockers closing.
With no regulation there is no crime. This goes for snuff, CP real rape, etc. No to regulation and more victims suffing, yes means people not doing it to profit from it online. No third option you can't pick and choose laws. |
Not again?
You did this a few weeks ago... |
Dear Paul,
Please shut the fuck up. Regards, The Internet |
Quote:
|
fuck off ...............
|
Quote:
We also have the thread of people accusing Manwin of owning Filesonic. Without regulation, what's to stop the Internet just becoming a place for people to download free stuff? |
Quote:
Done and decided to stick it out here. Took me longer than a heart beat, not as long as 2 though. :1orglaugh The good news is, I went for my quarterly check up today and the Oncologist said I'm a miracle. Not many of the specialist gave me a decent chance of surviving, those who did thought the best scenario was to remove my tongue. I told her it was the thought of not being around to annoy you that kept me going. Thanks PJ. :thumbsup |
|
Yes if internet rule #1 is a blanket ban on the over 60s.
|
Paul, the internet is global. There are no global laws. Each country has their own laws.
HTH Damian |
Quote:
|
the government is never going to regulate the market to buy your crappy old content. the end.
|
If it will stop redundant polls on GFY, then I'm all for it! :pimp
|
Quote:
totally different issue, and we don't need specific internet laws to get this done. :2 cents:. |
i love when people use snuff in examples.
snuff isnt real people. no snuff film has ever been found the fbi and countless investigations have never turned up a single snuff film, anyone in ADULT should really know this. its like unicorns... |
cp is legal online without 'regulation'..? which is such a broad term.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
links?? |
Quote:
|
We are loosing our freedom under obama. He wants to control the internet and many other things.
|
Quote:
Existing laws should apply to the Internet, does this mean laws since 1970, or whenever the Internet started, no law should include new technology of any kind or just the Internet should be exempt? |
Quote:
Make it easy and what's the odds? Obviously you missed the ones that were shown online. The CIA didn't. |
The internet has always been regulated. Even more so prior to 1990 when ARPA, and later 1990-1995 when the NSF, called the shots.
As for on-line piracy ... there's lots of case law dating back to the 1980s when BBSes were very popular and facilitating file trading. In short, much of the on-line legal issues that seem new aren't. Ron |
should poo be regulated ?
|
Fuck this poll... time for a joint
|
Quote:
Still the obvious misses most people here. All SOPA does is apply existing to laws to people who publish their work in the US in a way that makes it harder to penalise them. If you want to continue pirating, you're free to do so. Just make sure your site isn't targeted at the US, that you don't steal US property and have the backing of US companies. So you don't break existing US laws. Regulation exists online. No regulation would need laws to be passed exempting online. |
No regulation = No DMCA, copyright laws, child porn laws, libel laws, no Internet Neutrality laws, no fraud laws, no theft laws no protection against the Internet declining to the level of the scum and probably the end of the Internet as we know it and earn our living from it. I can take all Manwin's BB's RK's content and put it on one site for free and sell ad space or charge to DL it.
nothing to stop me or anyone else from doing this. Because the Internet is unregulated. |
regulating the internet means no google anymore since it breaks the copyright rules by copying stuff of your website without written permission remember.
|
Quote:
Unregulated means no site with anything that can be pirated. As the pirates would have a field day. Why buy anything pre recorded when you can pirate it? For instance I could take all your sites and give them away for free. Sod DMCA, it doesn't exist. LOL If we're talking extremes lets keep it extreme. :thumbsup You have a problem on your site solo porn stars, the preview doesn't work on my FF. |
Originally Posted by DamianJ
Paul, the internet is global. There are no global laws. Each country has their own laws. --------------------------------- So each country should regulate what's published in their own country. We agree. Quote:
The best way to fight illegal porn and stolen content is at the roots, thus at server/site owner level. For cp, bestiality, snuff and copyright infringement this is easy and logic. All this is illegal everywhere so it can be dealt with at server/site owner level. Content that isn't illegal everywhere, for example scat, could/should be blocked at service provider level. It would be impossible for the US to take down a server in Amsterdam because there is scat content distributed to US citizens from that server. Anyway, yes the internet should be regulated by applying the existing laws to it, don't make new separate laws for the internet. What's illegal in real life is illegal on the internet as well, simple. |
Quote:
|
Thanks. But how many scat slingers do you know? :1orglaugh
|
Quote:
the CIA would not hide this and would go public... So where oh where is a link thst says any CIA or FBI has found snuff. FBI has claimed no for years. google quickly shows FBI disputes existence of kill for sex for profit videoz snuff is supposed to be for sale, a commercial product made for money. Links? |
here ill go first:
https://www.google.com/search?q=fbi+...ient=firefox-a so here is fbi denying snuff, as a horror movie fanatic ive always wanted to believe in snuff, but its simply not real... i bet you guys think "faces of death" is all real too! lol if cia found snuff online it would surely be in google... |
Quote:
Come to think of it though, Blair Witch was even better. When someone told you about the new horror movie that was real you KNEW they were sporting an IQ of 82. |
The difficulty with regulating the internet is who will be in charge? If you have the wrong people regulating the internet it could be a disaster. If you have the right wings in charge sites like this one will be shut down, if you have the left wingers regulating it loads of shit that should not be allowed may be allowed so the question is who can make a good job of regulating the internet?
|
Murdering someone is a crime... no matter what tool is used to commit that murder. There's no need to make new laws for every new tool, appliance, vehicle,.... in order to prevent people from using it to commit murder. When Ford or Honda brings a new car to market, do we need a new law so people will know they can't use that specific car to deliberately run over people?
Committing fraud is a crime. It doesn't matter if you do it in a face2face setting, using a letter, using a telephone, using sign language, in English or in Japanese or using a computer. A computer connected to the internet is just another tool. No need to give more power to government bureaucrats. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The biggst problem of this amazing website is that noone sees the true value of this top notch top domainname including site/content and everything wich is for sale and looking for a new owner for a small fee. |
Quote:
|
Regulation or Censorhip being put in place? Paul wouldn't be able to post this question because the people in charge would be tired of his shit! LOL
|
Quote:
For content like scat, where it's illegal in the US and legal in another country there are bigger problems. Should a server be forced by law to make sure it's blocked from countries where it is illegal or should a country do the blocking itself. Maybe by the US saying US CC companies are not allowed to process payments, or just waiting for the owner to step onto US soil to arrest him? Yes offline laws should apply to online laws, it's making them enforceable that's the problem. As Damian says the Internet is Global. So while it may be legal in one country, it gets published world wide in places it's illegal. The existing laws are often powerless in dealing with new technologies. so laws have to be updated to the present day and level of technology. |
Quote:
Are you that sure that movies involving sex and death wouldn't appear if the Internet were unregulated? |
looks like a big NO
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123