Originally Posted by DarkJedi (Post 18711658)

Good. Keep em coming. Put all thieves behind bars.

Originally Posted by DamianJ (Post 18711883)

So, with no proof they cut off your internet, they make the ISPs do deep packet inspection so you have no privacy and you think this is good?

Originally Posted by DamianJ (Post 18711883)

However the same industry rightsholder groups that support the creation of ACTA have also called for mandatory network-level filtering by Internet Service Providers and for Internet Service Providers to terminate citizens' Internet connection on repeat allegation of copyright infringement (the "Three Strikes" /Graduated Response) so there is reason to believe that ACTA will seek to increase intermediary liability and require these things of Internet Service Providers. While mandating copyright filtering by ISPs will not be technologically effective because it can be defeated by use of encryption efforts to introduce network level filtering will likely involve deep packet inspection of citizens' Internet communications. This raises considerable concerns for citizens' civil liberties and privacy rights and the future of Internet innovation.

https://www.eff.org/issues/acta

So, with no proof they cut off your internet, they make the ISPs do deep packet inspection so you have no privacy and you think this is good?

Man oh man.

/me shakes head and walks off

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 18711935)

Who gives a fuck!

If this theft shit isn't stopped none of us will have an internet connection anyway
since we can't pay the bill.

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 18711935)

Who gives a fuck!

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 18711935)

If this theft shit isn't stopped none of us will have an internet connection anyway
since we can't pay the bill.

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 18711935)

None of these bills/laws would have ever come about if you had spent as much time
preaching to people to stop stealing content. Your preaching is a little too late and
directed at the wrong people.

Originally Posted by ProG (Post 18712058)

LOL at anyone who thinks bills like this will help pornographers in ANY way.

Originally Posted by DamianJ (Post 18712128)

Anyone that values their privacy.

ACTA makes the ISPs look at every packet of data you send and receive. You think that's a good idea?

Who is going to pay for it? The ISPs? I don't think so.



It won't be stopped.

And if it was, it wouldn't change sales. We are giving away all the porn you could possibly want for free. Legally.



People won't stop. Those are not the people that buy porn.

To take away someone's internet connection on an accusation is very wrong. IP spoofing, open wifi, grandkids coming over and stealing something on your connection etc.

You need to think this stuff through from a technical point of view and the implementation.

It's been proven to not work. I believe you have a fundamental right to use the internet and not be monitored whilst doing so.

It amuses me people that sell things that the public would be embarrassed to be caught viewing (legally) are in favour of making their customers love of german piss porn public knowledge. You don't think that would make people think twice about actually viewing legal porn?

/me shakes his head again

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 18712155)

Megaupload is finished, that means something to everybody that had content stolen.

Who gives a shit if it can't be stopped, just lock up the people who we can.

Make a motherfucker feel your pain whether it improves the bottom line or not.

Shooting one enemy solider will not win the war but I'm in favor of shooting him
anyway. :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by CyberHustler (Post 18712122)

Speak for yourself buddy! My wife will pay the internet bill if I ended up failing at this! (she's a hardcore gamer, COD xboxlive type shit) :1orglaugh