GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Now Gingrich and Romney Pledge To Ban Porn If Elected (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1053295)

porno jew 01-12-2012 12:50 PM

Now Gingrich and Romney Pledge To Ban Porn If Elected
 
WASHINGTON, Jan. 9, 2012 /Christian Newswire/ -- Three of the leading GOP 2012 Presidential candidates have made statements committing to enforce existing federal obscenity laws if they are elected, while the current administration still refuses to enforce federal obscenity laws prohibiting distribution of hardcore pornography, according to Morality in Media.

http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/6425818602.html

Phoenix 01-12-2012 12:51 PM

hmm being cdn is looking better all the time...although i might curb my travel to the us..lol

Scott McD 01-12-2012 01:04 PM

I prefer non nude anyway... :1orglaugh

pornmasta 01-12-2012 01:07 PM

anyway i vote for obama...
Now wait a second, i can't, i'm french....

CarlosTheGaucho 01-12-2012 01:10 PM

Yeah, now that's what the country needs - I see a New Deal in the making.

porno jew 01-12-2012 01:10 PM

no difference between the parties.

RON PAUL 2012.

bronco67 01-12-2012 01:35 PM

I've said it before. No group of men will ever get together and vote on banning porn. Maybe one dickhead can put up a show like he's against it, but that's about it.

porno jew 01-12-2012 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 18685138)
I've said it before. No group of men will ever get together and vote on banning porn. Maybe one dickhead can put up a show like he's against it, but that's about it.

all they have to do is enforce current obscenity statues. maybe you should re-read their quotes again and how they plan to do it.

kane 01-12-2012 01:45 PM

This happens every presidential election. The republicans need the religious right in order to win the election so they have to pander to them. This is part of the pandering. Romney came under fire for making millions off of porn when he was involved with the Marriott who makes bank from selling pay per view porn. He was asked to remove the porn from the hotels and wouldn't do it.

This is just one of those groups they all sign on for. There is another where they promise not to raise taxes and another where they promise to give money to churches and another where they promise to strike down abortion. Doesn't mean any of it will happen.

baryl 01-12-2012 01:47 PM

They're just pandering to that audience like most politicians. I also didn't see any of them "pledging to ban porn" but rather pledging to enforce current obscenity laws which are pretty much non existent. Not one of them mentioned a word about creating a new law.
What are they going to say to a bunch of uptight evangelicals? "Nope, I love porn"
Those knuckleheads just want to be verbally massaged.

bronco67 01-12-2012 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scott McD (Post 18685064)
I prefer non nude anyway... :1orglaugh

Funny you say that ... I find myself lately really appreciating hot, well done pics of girls that don't involve stretched assholes and jizz covered faces.

baryl 01-12-2012 01:52 PM

Funny, one of the links from that site is a reported attack page.

bronco67 01-12-2012 01:57 PM

You just know Gingrich has sat at a computer screen, beating his limp vienna sausage link to barely legal braces girls.

raymor 01-12-2012 02:45 PM

Again, porno jew, why do you feel the need to lie? Do you think that the truth makes your guy look bad? Well okay, the truth probably does make your guy look bad. No one pledged to ban porn. They, like Obama, pledged to enforce the law.

Obama made the same pledge, twice.

porno jew 01-12-2012 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor (Post 18685290)
Obama made the same pledge, twice.

really? link?

obama doesn't have a huge voter base of medieval nutcases to appeal to, these clowns do. i hope you can see that.

czarina 01-12-2012 02:54 PM

that means I'll have to vote to reelect Obama, oh well!

Barry-xlovecam 01-12-2012 03:23 PM

If they mean what they say then they are in direct opposition to this industry.

If they are just pandering to the Christian Right for financial support, endorsements and votes and they are making empty promises -- they are just liars.

porno jew 01-12-2012 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 18685352)
If they mean what they say then they are in direct opposition to this industry.

If they are just pandering to the Christian Right for financial support, endorsements and votes and they are making empty promises -- they are just liars.

that people vote for a party that runs on a campaign to prosecute and shut down their industry seems just a little bit insane. definitely delusional on some level. very odd.

oscer 01-12-2012 03:30 PM

damn people keep electing socialists that have no clue how to make tax revenue

2MuchMark 01-12-2012 03:41 PM

Fuck both of those 2 assholes. They will say anything in front of a crowd if they think it will get applause.

Rochard 01-12-2012 03:51 PM

It doesn't matter - Obama has already won.

Years ago the Attorney General of Michigan was running for Governor, and she had this huge press conference about how she was going to clean up the Internet. She named five "solo girls", one of which was Tawnee Stone, and promised a huge investigation. She got elected - and nothing ever happened.

There is nothing illegal about porn; The US Government fought this with Playboy for decades and lost. Then factor in freedom of speech and this will be in court for decades and nothing will ever come of it.

Operator 01-12-2012 03:52 PM

Run Paul Run

mafia_man 01-12-2012 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18685158)
all they have to do is enforce current obscenity statues. maybe you should re-read their quotes again and how they plan to do it.

Supreme Court will overturn convictions.

Klen 01-12-2012 03:57 PM

Sounds like they just want to ban bad porn like max hardcore was doing.

porno jew 01-12-2012 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mafia_man (Post 18685398)
Supreme Court will overturn convictions.

tell that to max hardcore.

onwebcam 01-12-2012 04:02 PM


scottybuzz 01-12-2012 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 18685138)
I've said it before. No group of men will ever get together and vote on banning porn. Maybe one dickhead can put up a show like he's against it, but that's about it.

well thats what you think, but look at other countries. Germany brought in some stupid law some time ago that meant you had to register to view porn. Australia has strict rules and don't even start with Islam. All run by men.

It was men who brought in prohibition in the States too.
I bet there were people like you saying that would never happen too.

L-Pink 01-12-2012 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 18685180)
Funny you say that ... I find myself lately really appreciating hot, well done pics of girls that don't involve stretched assholes and jizz covered faces.

Gotta agree!

.

bronco67 01-12-2012 04:12 PM

So his name should be pronounced Meet Romney.

pornmasta 01-12-2012 04:19 PM

Meat Romney ?
Myth (buster) Romney ?
Mite Romney ?

raymor 01-12-2012 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18685354)
that people vote for a party that runs on a campaign to prosecute and shut down their industry seems just a little bit insane. definitely delusional on some level. very odd.

Your have the party who when asked replies "uh, yeah, sure, we'll enforce the law". Then on the other side you have the party who enacted a new censorship law (CDA, Clinton, 1996) and when the supreme court struck that down they tried again to enact more censorship (CDA II, Clinton, 1998).

We you have to lie and lie and keep lying because the truth looks bad for your guys, maybe you picked the wrong guys to support.

PR_Glen 01-12-2012 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottybuzz (Post 18685422)
well thats what you think, but look at other countries. Germany brought in some stupid law some time ago that meant you had to register to view porn. Australia has strict rules and don't even start with Islam. All run by men.

It was men who brought in prohibition in the States too.
I bet there were people like you saying that would never happen too.

actually the prohibition movement was brought on by a womans group originally... didn't last very long and was a mass failure because people found another way to get around the laws. Which would be the exact same thing that would happen if they tried that with porn.

raymor 01-12-2012 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18685354)
that people vote for a party that runs on a campaign to prosecute and shut down their industry seems just a little bit insane. definitely delusional on some level. very odd.

I agree, so why are you trying SO hard to promote them? CDA, Clinton, 1996. When the supreme court struck that down they tried again to enact more censorship with CDA II, Clinton, 1998.

I agree you're a little insane to pretend it's the republicans doing that while you keep supporting the guys who really and truly do sign censorship bills into law.

porno jew 01-12-2012 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor (Post 18685452)
Your have the party who when asked replies "uh, yeah, sure, we'll enforce the law". Then on the other side you have the party who enacted a new censorship law (CDA, Clinton, 1996) and when the supreme court struck that down they tried again to enact more censorship (CDA II, Clinton, 1998).

We you have to lie and lie and keep lying because the truth looks bad for your guys, maybe you picked the wrong guys to support.

who was convicted for obscenity under clinton?

and please post links to obama's pledges against obscenity that you previously claimed. thanks. otherwise i will just think you are making shit up again.

stocktrader23 01-12-2012 04:42 PM

Seriously, anyone that says both parties are the same is either

a) fucking retarded.

b) willfully ignorant.

c) trolling.

It's 2012. Everyone here has the internet. There is absolutely NO excuse for your extreme fucking stupidity.


stocktrader23 01-12-2012 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mafia_man (Post 18685398)
Supreme Court will overturn convictions.

If the Republicans managed to win this election the takeover of the Supreme Court would be complete. There would be no overturned convictions because the extremely conservative idiots on the SC would have the numbers to bend each and every one of us over in all aspects of the law.

SykkBoy 01-12-2012 04:53 PM

some lessons that need to be learned -
religious right wing whackos get out and vote
self-righteous pornographers and average joe jerkrags stay home and jerk off to internet porn

V_RocKs 01-12-2012 05:58 PM

Time for the industry to check their members logs

GregE 01-12-2012 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornmasta (Post 18685439)
Meat Romney ?
Myth (buster) Romney ?
Mite Romney ?

"Mitt! Mitt! Nitwit!"

I knew a guy who used to scream that at the top of his lungs every time Romney's name was mentioned four years ago.

I thought maybe the guy was a little touched in the head but then I decided to give him the benefit of the doubt given that he was only pointing out the obvious.

DaddyHalbucks 01-12-2012 06:16 PM

I'm voting for Dr. Paul.

raymor 01-12-2012 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18685465)
who was convicted for obscenity under Clinton.

I listed fourteen of them for you last week. Do your own research this time. As you know, it's a long list, just over twice as many as under Bush.

porno jew 01-12-2012 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor (Post 18685638)
I listed fourteen of them for you last week. Do your own research this time. As you know, it's a long list, just over twice as many as under Bush.

how many under obama so far?

where is his statement on obscenity? can't find it. are you lying?

raymor 01-12-2012 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stocktrader23 (Post 18685490)
If the Republicans managed to win this election the takeover of the Supreme Court would be complete. There would be no overturned convictions because the extremely conservative idiots on the SC would have the numbers to bend each and every one of us over in all aspects of the law.

Too late. Precedent has already been set when Clinton's various censorship bills were all ruled unconstitutional.

topnotch, standup guy 01-12-2012 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 18685400)
Sounds like they just want to ban bad porn like max hardcore was doing.

Think again Captain Save-a-Hoe.

The only bad porn (aside from cp, scat and farmyard) is stolen porn and the last I heard Max wasn't a thief.

As for the Republicans, they want to target all of us.

.

topnotch, standup guy 01-12-2012 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stocktrader23 (Post 18685482)
Seriously, anyone that says both parties are the same is either

a) fucking retarded.

b) willfully ignorant.

c) trolling.

It's 2012. Everyone here has the internet. There is absolutely NO excuse for your extreme fucking stupidity.

I have to say that I find your political views to be very much out of character given your pro piracy position.

Indeed, I'd figure a bloke like you would get wood reading about Romney's exploits with Bain Capital and then literally cream his jeans when he discovered just how many hard working people Mitt put out of work.

What's going on Bucky? Are you feeling okay?

.

baddog 01-12-2012 07:34 PM

I do not think we have much to worry about. They could not do it even if they meant what they said.

stocktrader23 01-12-2012 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by topnotch, standup guy (Post 18685704)
I have to say that I find your political views to be very much out of character given your pro piracy position.

Indeed, I'd figure a bloke like you would get wood reading about Romney's exploits with Bain Capital and then literally cream his jeans when he discovered just how many hard working people Mitt put out of work.

What's going on Bucky? Are you feeling okay?

.

If you think I'm pro piracy you aren't paying attention. I'm pro common sense.

Paul Markham 01-13-2012 12:41 AM

christiannewswire.com

Look at where it was reported and go from there.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 18685400)
Sounds like they just want to ban bad porn like max hardcore was doing.

Which was done on a very dubious charge. Because the obscenity charge failed.

More GFY pussies will get scared by this, most will treat it at it's deserved. Contempt.

epitome 01-13-2012 01:52 AM

Gotta love the double standard.

If they make the promise and don't follow through they were just pandering to their base.

If Obama does the same thing he should get the boot.

icymelon 01-13-2012 02:16 AM

why anyone who is in porn would vote for a republican is beyond me


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123