GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Some of the most beautiful girls I have ever shot. Lots of pics. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1051303)

Paul Markham 12-25-2011 02:23 AM

Some of the most beautiful girls I have ever shot. Lots of pics.
 
As others seem to be doing it, I thought it was time a no body pooped in and gave it a shot.

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/glamour4.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/oldscan.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/oldscan1.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/slide2.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/glamour6.jpg

Sorry for the quality of the scans. Shot on film and scanned.

simmeon 12-25-2011 02:30 AM

You just created a new niche.

Cystomatic 12-25-2011 02:36 AM

Very nice girl, although she should trim her bush sometimes...

Paul Markham 12-25-2011 02:39 AM

One of the most beautiful, cheeky and a naughty one.

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/0005a.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/glamour5.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp//glamour7.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp//glamour9.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp//glamour8.jpg

Paul Markham 12-25-2011 02:58 AM

And who will forget Andrea Spinks?

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/andreaspinks1.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/andreaspinks2.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/andreaspinks3.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/andreaspinks4.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/andreaspinks5.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/andreaspinks6.jpg

theking 12-25-2011 03:09 AM

In my opinion non of those girls are "beautiful"...they are reasonably good looking.

teomaxxx 12-25-2011 04:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 18652037)
In my opinion non of those girls are "beautiful"...they are reasonably good looking.

coming from same country(czech republic) as Paul, i have to say i saw more nice girls at 5am this morning in our bar then in this thread.

lagcam 12-25-2011 04:25 AM

Spam has sell by dates also. Look at the base of the tin first next time please.

CurrentlySober 12-25-2011 04:34 AM

YAY ! Pixie! I shot her myself a few time, and I was there when she shot the music video for 'Add N To X - Plug Me In' with my X Wife :)

Heres the VIDEO !

Matyko 12-25-2011 04:39 AM

Sorry Sir, this is far from hot. Some mediocre girls along with one who has disturbingly-youngish face.

ottopottomouse 12-25-2011 04:51 AM

Where's the beautiful ones?

Paul Markham 12-25-2011 04:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cystomatic (Post 18652020)
Very nice girl, although she should trim her bush sometimes...

Some of these are from the late 80s, you had to eat bush or you didn't get fucked in those days.

Jack Sparrow 12-25-2011 05:52 AM

In before the dramas.

Oracle Porn 12-25-2011 06:09 AM

this is the worst content I have ever seen, I wouldn't even give it away for free to my surfers, they don't like garbage.

seeandsee 12-25-2011 06:12 AM

oldy but goody :)

Paul Markham 12-25-2011 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cystomatic (Post 18652020)
Very nice girl, although she should trim her bush sometimes...

What niche is that?

Paul Markham 12-25-2011 06:38 AM

http://paulmarkham.com/temp//glamour.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp//glamour2.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp//glamour11.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp//glamour12.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp//glamour10.jpg

Sorry about some of the scans. These are from decades ago.

lagcam 12-25-2011 06:49 AM

Would love to what some of these grannys look like NOW :winkwink:

Paul Markham 12-25-2011 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teomaxxx (Post 18652069)
coming from same country(czech republic) as Paul, i have to say i saw more nice girls at 5am this morning in our bar then in this thread.

Well these girls are English so you have to excuse them being ugly.

Luckily I was such a bad shooter, the girls were so ugly. But no one wanted to shoot for magazines in the 80 and 90, so the mags had to buy from me.

Eternally grateful all the great online shooters with such great girls that everyone here loves. Were happier shooting custom for cheap prices. Otherwise they would of taken our business away from us. :thumbsup

DamianJ 12-25-2011 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18652442)
Well these girls are English so you have to excuse them being ugly.

Luckily I was such a bad shooter, the girls were so ugly. But no one wanted to shoot for magazines in the 80 and 90, so the mags had to buy from me.

Eternally grateful all the great online shooters with such great girls that everyone here loves. Were happier shooting custom for cheap prices. Otherwise they would of taken our business away from us. :thumbsup

Not everyone wants to break the law and end up in court like you Paul. You flew the flag, we're proud of you for being a criminal and fighting The Man. Happy Chrsitmas

Paul Markham 12-25-2011 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lagcam (Post 18652072)
Spam has sell by dates also. Look at the base of the tin first next time please.

So retro and vintage doesn't sell. Noted.

anexsia 12-25-2011 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oracle Porn (Post 18652136)
this is the worst content I have ever seen, I wouldn't even give it away for free to my surfers, they don't like garbage.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
I have seen better pictures taken by students in "Introduction To Photography" in college.

Lace 12-25-2011 06:05 PM

I feel like I'm looking at my grandfather's porno collection.

This is SHIT.

ladida 12-25-2011 07:34 PM

You have a weird taste in faces. They all have some similar line in them, and i don't find them that attractive :)

DVTimes 12-25-2011 07:44 PM

I think one problem is they are scans from slides or/and negatives that were not scaned correctly.

i bet if they were scaned now correctly they would look much better.

i remeber scanning slides ages ago. some scaned great, while others scaned yuck. it depends on the film/negatives and if the scanner can scan they correctly.

The Porn Nerd 12-25-2011 09:15 PM

So the only good shit you shot was for Astral-Blue.com? Wow. Okay, well....

And Paul: how OLD is that blond? She looks like she's, well, way under the legal minimum (tho I'm sure she's 18, right?).

And it's 'pooped in and gave it a SHIT".
You should pay me for editing you Mr. Markham.

PS: Merry fucking Christmas! :D

JFK 12-26-2011 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lagcam (Post 18652167)
Would love to what some of these grannys look like NOW :winkwink:

That would be kind of interesting, where are they now, kind of thing:winkwink: ?

raymor 12-26-2011 09:11 AM

Those are some of my favorite Markham shoots.

2intense 12-26-2011 10:42 AM

oh shit,no

L-Pink 12-26-2011 11:49 AM

Seriously, It's a miracle anyone bought anything from you ever.

.

Biggie Smalls Web Writing 12-26-2011 02:24 PM

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

PornoStar69 12-26-2011 06:45 PM

naughty naughty very naughty :)

$5 submissions 12-26-2011 06:53 PM

Were these videos shot around the time this video came out?

























Just messing with you, Paul :P

lagcam 12-27-2011 03:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK (Post 18653233)
That would be kind of interesting, where are they now, kind of thing:winkwink: ?

I actually feel a bit sorry for them.

They agreed to be shot naked for a magazine. I bet they had never heard of the internet.

Little did they know, 30 years later when they are long retired with families, somebody would be plastering them all over the internet.

That is one hell of a forward thinking release you got them to sign Paul.

Paul Markham 12-27-2011 03:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anexsia (Post 18652634)
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
I have seen better pictures taken by students in "Introduction To Photography" in college.

So have I. Your post is pointless, as I make no claims to be a photographer.

Paul Markham 12-27-2011 03:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 18652813)
I think one problem is they are scans from slides or/and negatives that were not scaned correctly.

i bet if they were scaned now correctly they would look much better.

i remeber scanning slides ages ago. some scanned great, while others scanned yuck. it depends on the film/negatives and if the scanner can scan they correctly.

No the problem is stupid people responding to the name of the poster more than the content.

If I'm so bad, every single shooter not selling to magazines who they claim is better. Is stupid. Because these sets earned far more than a custom shooter ever got paid for a set and would of made a sponsor's website content budget $0.

It has nothing to do with anything like that, they are my pictures, therefore crap girls and very bad shots.

Even Damian come's up with a stupid excuse about it being illegal. Shooting for magazines was never illegal in the UK.

Paul Markham 12-27-2011 03:55 AM

More ugly girls.

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/a.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/b.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/c.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/d.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/e.jpg

Of course still crap girls, crap shots, wrong looks and bloody awful. shame they made so much money. could of been shooting for ATK for $300 a scene or Manwin for $700 a scene exclusive. Like all the great shooters here.

Which is why the bullshit never has any effect on me. It's all about $$$ earned.

theking 12-27-2011 04:23 AM

You posted that these are some of the most beautiful girls you shot. None of them are beautiful...in my opinion...they are reasonably good looking at best. The shots themselves are not any better than thousands of shots by other shooters...and worse than some...average at best.

That is your problem...you think that you have some outstanding skills...and you don't. It is good that you apparently managed to eke out a living for so many years selling to magazines...but you certainly are not the know all and end all that you think you are.

AdultEUhost-Sebas 12-27-2011 05:26 AM

Old school............

DamianJ 12-27-2011 05:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18654333)
Even Damian come's up with a stupid excuse about it being illegal. Shooting for magazines was never illegal in the UK.

I was bigging you up for sticking it to The Man Paul! You went to COURT! Hardballing right there. Most of the people criticising you wouldn't have the nerve to produce porn if it was illegal, would have pissed their panties on a raid and would have given up if they were taken to court. Not you. Props to you!

You're like a freedom fighter.

Great pics!

Lykos 12-27-2011 06:33 AM

Some nice,old bitches here :thumbsup

Paul Markham 12-27-2011 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK (Post 18653233)
That would be kind of interesting, where are they now, kind of thing:winkwink: ?

I've "met" a few on FB and contacted a few other ways. One is now a Grandma, most are married with kids. A few are still modeling. None seemed upset that I contacted them. Some were very supportive of my fight with cancer. All expresses joy that I was settled and happy.

Even got one who will come and see me soon, she had a Czech au pair and will visit her soon. hopig to meet one of the old time shooters as well soon.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamainJ
I was bigging you up for sticking it to The Man Paul! You went to COURT! Hardballing right there. Most of the people criticising you wouldn't have the nerve to produce porn if it was illegal, would have pissed their panties on a raid and would have given up if they were taken to court. Not you. Props to you!

You're like a freedom fighter.

Great pics!

Then please accept my apologies.

The raids were a bloody nuisance, as it went with the territory of doing what I was doing. I accepted it. All they could ever pin on me, because it's all there was. Was selling on un-certificated videos in the UK. Stood in the dock, pleaded guilty, because I was, and got a fine. When the prosecution tried to blacken me with the content I was shooting. My barrister steamed in with the only charge was un-cerificated videos, no obscenity charges and all the content was documented with IDs.

Got a fine, 2 years to pay. And moved out of mail order videos. Had made my money, put some aside and went into magazine shooting. was churning stuff out with new girls. Some as good as these and some not. It was a quantity game for me. Wasn't going to take on the Colby's and Harrison's of the magazine content game.

Paul Markham 12-27-2011 08:14 AM

Is this one good enough for you guys?

Bit later and better scan.

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/glamour13.jpg

http://paulmarkham.com/temp/glamour14.jpg

Paul Markham 12-27-2011 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultEUhost-Sebas (Post 18654388)
Old school............

True, nothing wrong with that. 40+ year old's still buy porn, when they can get their zimmer frame to the keyboard. :1orglaugh

Paul Markham 12-27-2011 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lykos (Post 18654452)
Some nice,old bitches here :thumbsup

Not when I shot them. :thumbsup

Jakez 12-27-2011 03:51 PM

Free porn is good for the business. We must give away more.

st0ned 12-27-2011 04:03 PM

To each their own. I honestly don't find any of those girls "beautiful". A few are somewhat attractive I guess.

nico-t 12-27-2011 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oracle Porn (Post 18652136)
this is the worst content I have ever seen, I wouldn't even give it away for free to my surfers, they don't like garbage.

:1orglaugh

papill0n 12-27-2011 07:24 PM

the women aren't beautiful and the photography is shit

fris 12-27-2011 10:28 PM

those are nice shots, better than the earlier stuff


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123