GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   CDN providers - in here (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1048920)

borked 12-07-2011 12:37 PM

CDN providers - in here
 
So, I've had it ^up to here^ trying to deal with CDN providers for my clients who want secure streaming protection. Every single time I waste many many hours with them, only in the end for them to admit they cannot do what I am asking them to do, even though their streaming media (be it adobe FMS or wowza) support what I want them to do.

You guys, you are sitting on a goldmine here if you can implement what I ask you to implement, because without it you are losing clients who go back to streaming from their own servers to protect their content. With it, I can then send you people who ask me "any CDN supports this" (atm, I say no).

Yes, ok, you all offer some forms of security, but expiring keys, header tokens and unencrypted streams DO NOT cut it. Your streaming software server supports this, I can implement this, your clients want this, so why are you all so frikken stubborn not to enforce this!!!

</rant>

Barefootsies 12-07-2011 12:41 PM

I hear you BROmance. That is why we have had to develop our own (without all of the bullshit bandwidth charges). We are still in BETA but we are testing it with ElevatedX right now. Hopefully we can roll it out as a consumer product once all of the testing and trials are completed over the next few months.

:pimp

borked 12-07-2011 03:27 PM

It's deafening in here with the lack of responses!

Footsies, while I appreciate it, I too have my own CMS dealing with this, but I need a CDN to offer to people now...

We'll see if those that have contacted me can come through... I'd love to see this an actual implementation this time....

raymor 12-07-2011 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by borked (Post 18614311)
It's deafening in here with the lack of responses.

We're all still waiting for a CDN that supports plain old ordinary HTTP correctly. From what I've seen they've all been done by people who failed compsci 101.

JimmyStephans 12-07-2011 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor (Post 18614377)
We're all still waiting for a CDN that supports plain old ordinary HTTP correctly. From what I've seen they've all been done by people who failed compsci 101.

I agree with you on that one.

I tried one host, it was such a mess, I had to give up after 5 weeks and thousands of lost dollars!

PowerCum 12-07-2011 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raymor (Post 18614377)
We're all still waiting for a CDN that supports plain old ordinary HTTP correctly. From what I've seen they've all been done by people who failed compsci 101.

Mine does, in fact it's just plain old http with streaming options for mass volumes.

ISPrime_dimi 12-07-2011 05:17 PM

Andy, emailing you now -- I'm interested to find out what we can do for you.

borked 12-09-2011 01:01 PM

so, of those that hit me up (4 in total), the answer is no.

I find it hard to believe that in this day and age where people are demanding their content to be secured, the CDNs and CDN-providers cannot do it. Especially so when the technology they are using to stream has the capacity (fwiw, Adobe FMS is worse than Wowza WMS in this regard).

I've bookmarked my own thread so I can send people here. That way I don't waste any more time with trying to explain how a CDN and secure content are non-compatible.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123