I understand the .xxx issue this way, am I wrong?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • biskoppen
    Confirmed User
    • Mar 2003
    • 5809

    #1

    I understand the .xxx issue this way, am I wrong?

    Ok, I havent spent much time trying to understand this whole .xxx thingy..

    But.. here is how I see it :

    Some company "invented" .xxx and are now trying to get all the governments to censor all porn that is not placed on this extension .. and with this very threat they are charging everyone $99 a pop for the domains.

    Is this correct? And if so, isnt this a big case of black mailing?

    Btw.. I just, for funzies, tried quite a few, not so popular, two word adult .xxx domains and they were all taken = these guys are already making millions with this scam?
    Last edited by biskoppen; 11-30-2011, 02:28 PM.
    Submit my videos to make bank, tons of 5 minute videos offered right here
  • alias
    aliasx
    • Apr 2001
    • 19010

    #2
    Surely the world's governments will unite on this issue and make Lawley billions.

    More likely the governments will just ban it and retain control instead of handing it over to a third party.
    https://porncorporation.com

    Comment

    • porno jew
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Nov 2006
      • 10166

      #3
      it was created to protect children.

      Comment

      • biskoppen
        Confirmed User
        • Mar 2003
        • 5809

        #4
        Originally posted by porno jew
        it was created to protect children.
        Why is it $99 then?
        Submit my videos to make bank, tons of 5 minute videos offered right here

        Comment

        • FlexxAeon
          Confirmed User
          • May 2003
          • 3765

          #5
          Originally posted by biskoppen
          Why is it $99 then?
          kids are expensive?
          flexx [dot] aeon [at] gmail

          Comment

          • porno jew
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Nov 2006
            • 10166

            #6
            Originally posted by biskoppen
            Why is it $99 then?
            i think most of it goes to children's charities.

            Comment

            Working...