Please List All Non-Biased News Sources
 

Is there such a thing?

If so, please list them here.

Seriously, this challenge is open to all!

crickets..lol

What does that say?

all news is junk and if you are forming your worldview from news stories you are bound to be deluded.

There is obviously no such thing as an unbiased news source. The best way to get a complete picture is to see the spin from as many different angles as possible. Usually there are some elements of truth in each source that can be pieced together from reading multiple sources into some kind of coherent whole.

bbc is as close as you'll get, it's not government controlled and not owned by a media baron.

You cannot possibly be serious. :error

:1orglaugh

Couldn't be more wrong. RT.com is probably the only one I can think of, but even then people will see it as "anti-american" probably.

I watch BBC World news, RT and the Local station which rarely has an international bullshit and is much more local which I think is good.

Shouldn't the bias filtering be done by the reader?

I can tell the difference between a biased piece and a unbiased one, can't you?

RT is totally pro Putin, it's sometimes really funny. but internationally it's ok.

but in this case you might also look into Al Djazeera english

You go first.
It ought to be good. For you the Onion probably tops your list or maybe NPR.

very :thumbsup

pretty much. it is very instructive to check on social media and get first hand reports from people there. the gap between that what is reported in regular news sites is so large you have to be stupid to take any news source uncritically.

Nonbiased news goes against human nature.

Someone has to write the news. That person has to be motivated to write the news. What motivates someone to do this? Money. Power.

The corporate newspaper is trying to keep it to a specific demographic so that they can sell advertisements to that demographic.

The noncorporate newspaper is based around a political agenda of some sort. They are searching for power over their readers and want to increase their power by bringing in more readers.

al jazzera their regular news reporting is pretty objective as far as it goes. their arab spring coverage was pretty impressive. cbc is pretty good.

american's have been so poisoned by their toxic stew of media they find it unfathomable that some news agencies outside of the US try to live up to objective journalistic standards.

Yeah it is, but when they are reporting on international stuff they seem to try and deliver the on the ground stories.

Can't get Al Jazeera, but probably wouldn't watch that anyway.

All reporting has a bias.

i think broccoli would be offended to be in the same excitement category as CBC

BBC is one of the worst IMHO, completely biased and one-sided towards the UN, EU, Climate Change, Vaccines, Wars (even using film studios that show actors in Libya) :2 cents:

Al Jazeera is owned by the West :2 cents:

http://www.prisonplanet.com

http://www.abovetopsecret.com

http://www.godlikeproductions.com

http://www.rumormillnews.com

Lots of conspiracies about this one :upsidedow

someone please post the winning lotto #'s

Oh dear, what a pity, nevermind.

channel4 news in the uk is good.

:1orglaugh

I do enjoy a dose of RT, which of course has a different type of propaganda

proof? of course you have none.

maybe post a youtube video made by a brain damaged half-wit.

The only unbiased news in the world: http://www.aljazeera.com/

yes a putin controlled news source is free. of course. it says the opposite of mainstream media here. it must be true.

Even without me giving you proof, you only have to watch the channel for a short while to see who's agenda they are working for. Judge them by their fruits :2 cents:

Trying to scare people with Bin Laden videos...anti-Gaddafi propaganda (watch their interviews with him)

I didn't say it was true, but it's interesting

:1orglaugh

IS FUNNY BECAUSE HE IS SMALLEST ONE! :1orglaugh

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e5...ouadfamguy.png
link hotten

interesting concept, unbiased news

Fox News has to be in any mix, it reports on alot of important stories that get bypassed by the mainstream media.

:1orglaugh

all news sources are biased.

I get most of my news here. :1orglaugh

I think all news organizations are biased. It's not a big deal. They always have been since the beginning.

It's just more easy to see in this day and age because of 24 hour cable news networks that need to fill time with commentators.

In my opinion the MOST biased news organization is definitely MSNBC. They don't even try to hide it. It's a Republican Hate-Fest on that channel. lol

Sigh.

I just assumed al jazzera would be completely biased. I started watching their live feeds when some of the Middle Eastern countries fell, and much to my surprise... I discovered they were pretty good.

It actually is a big deal. Maybe you didn't know but only like 3 companies own all the news channels, radio channels, and newspapers.

The public is fed lies and propaganda through all of these venues.

You think Fox is different from CNN and MSNBC and CBS when there's really no difference at all.

Wake... the fuck.... up....

I...am...awake

And as I said...it's ALWAYS been that way in the U.S.

And I never said a word about "Fox is different from CNN and MSNBC and CBS"

You didn't understand what I was saying. I said they are ALL biased. And always have been. It's just easier for you to see it now because they don't even hide it on Cable News anymore.

They still try to pretend to be unbiased on the major networks. But of course they aren't. They just use more subtle (and better) ways of promoting their particular bias. Voice inflections, facial expressions, etc.

Obvious troll is obvious.

The fact that they all push the 2-party paradigm, whether "right" of "left" shows that they are all biased in the same way. They are all keeping the public divided and distracted. You think they're different because some are republican and some are democrat but they're all pushing the same damn agenda.

I agree.

But the worse thing is...even though the network news organizations were pretty liberal biased when I was a kid in the 1960's and 1970's...at least they still did REAL journalism. They investigated stuff. And they did the job of the free press: they QUESTIONED the govt.

When I was a kid watching coverage of the Vietnam War, you would see Dan Rather at CBS and even Geraldo Rivera for ABC reporting from places they were NOT supposed to be. With bullets flying. And they would openly show our troops doing "good" AND when they did "bad". And they questioned the validity of the war every step of the way.

Fast forward to the last couple of decades: Not only do they NOT question the govt., but they don't investigate anything. They are handed press releases by the feds and read them on the news like it's all fact.

And the wars? The freakin' journalists were "Embedded" with the troops. Thus insuring that we would only see the "good" and there was never any questioning during the wars.

Remember when we went into Iraq? And the "journalists" were riding "triumphantly" into Baghdad practically bragging about it instead of reporting.

It's a disgrace.

Yahoo front page.

www.Infowars.com
www.prisonplanet.tv
http://www.corbettreport.com/
http://www.globalresearch.ca/
http://www.naturalnews.com
http://www.rense.com/
www.rt.com
www.presstv.com
www.maxkeiser.com
www.tarpley.net

does an unbiased news source even exist? cnn claims they are...but really?