GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Juicy gossip about Juicy Ads (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1040716)

Intrinsic 10-05-2011 10:55 PM

Juicy gossip about Juicy Ads
 
Who got the juicy news?

http://www.threadbombing.com/data/me...jo_popcorn.gif

porno jew 10-05-2011 10:58 PM

rip juicy ads ...?

Intrinsic 10-05-2011 11:00 PM

Here's the alle-gay-tions

http://i.imgur.com/4JJSF.png

http://i.imgur.com/4JJSF.png

bean-aid 10-05-2011 11:12 PM

Hmmm, always 2 sides. I noticed traffic was much, much better about 6 months ago when you could select "all" for sites that could send you traffic. Then I got an email that said I couldn't receive traffic from "general" or "non-adult" or whatever. Stats plummeted after so I stopped buying.

porno jew 10-05-2011 11:12 PM

ads pulled.

Barefootsies 10-05-2011 11:13 PM

Those are pretty serious claims.

:2 cents:

SNRProductions 10-05-2011 11:44 PM

I'm not buying it. Don't think Jay would jeopardize a good thing like that.

LeRoy 10-05-2011 11:51 PM

bullshit :2 cents:

icymelon 10-06-2011 12:04 AM

could be a technical malfunction

porno jew 10-06-2011 12:06 AM

sounds like some rogue code.

Jakez 10-06-2011 12:18 AM

LOL, this is all some shit started by some pissed off publisher (whadda you know, the OP LOL) that is probably just confused and hot headed. He (xprofile) emailed me multiple times already telling me JuicyAds is scamming him (and me, according to him), quote "I gonna fuck them big time", very professional and informative. The image/message posted here has plenty of grammatical errors and hardly makes sense at all, "2/3 of ads code at my sites are completely different from the ones JuicyAds.com are selling to Advertisers"? English please. All it would take is like 10 refreshes of a page displaying ads to prove this incorrect. And the statement doesn't even make sense to begin with. I have no idea wtf this guy is going on about.

What a joke. The guy is making all this fuss over some small publisher account pushing like less than 100 clicks a day. I smell a ban.

topsiteking 10-06-2011 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by icymelon (Post 18472454)
could be a technical malfunction

Kinda what I was thinking.

BIGTYMER 10-06-2011 12:34 AM

Sure was nice out today.

Intrinsic 10-06-2011 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakez (Post 18472467)
LOL, this is all some shit started by some pissed off publisher (whadda you know, the OP LOL) that is probably just confused and hot headed. He (xprofile) emailed me multiple times already telling me JuicyAds is scamming him (and me, according to him), quote "I gonna fuck them big time", very professional and informative. The image/message posted here has plenty of grammatical errors and hardly makes sense at all, "2/3 of ads code at my sites are completely different from the ones JuicyAds.com are selling to Advertisers"? English please. All it would take is like 10 refreshes of a page displaying ads to prove this incorrect. And the statement doesn't even make sense to begin with. I have no idea wtf this guy is going on about.

What a joke. The guy is making all this fuss over some small publisher account pushing like less than 100 clicks a day. I smell a ban.

lmao 1. i speak english 2. i go straight to gfy with my probs i dont email random wms for weeks? 3. you sound really defensive for someone thats not a juicy rep.. but thanks for trying

Jakez 10-06-2011 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Intrinsic (Post 18472485)
lmao 1. i speak english 2. i go straight to gfy with my probs i dont email random wms for weeks? 3. you sound really defensive for someone thats not a juicy rep.. but thanks for trying

1. Hardly.
2. LOL
3. I'm defensive because I came home after a great night to another email from you telling me they're scamming me and then I see this thread and almost thought something was actually going on before I realized the OP is just the same confused retard (that's you) that's been emailing me.
4. Profit!!! (me, not you).

Enjoy your ban.

Intrinsic 10-06-2011 12:43 AM

i got 99 problems but a ban aint one

Jakez 10-06-2011 01:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Intrinsic (Post 18472493)
i got 99 problems but a ban aint one

LOL, you're attempting to destroy an industry award winning business with your "alle-GAY-tions". Going to take a bit more proof than your shitty english in some hardly legible image/message to avoid a ban idiot. Good luck.

PS: read the forum rules.

jscott 10-06-2011 03:12 AM

Bullshit, were you trying to scam advert buyers? scam juicyads?

Juicy pays me, on time, and Jay is a good business man, to jeopardize his company for 1 publisher, no way, I don't buy 1 second of your scam claim

pornguy 10-06-2011 06:21 AM

It was a CSS thing. Nothing to see here.

Rochard 10-06-2011 07:20 AM

I think Jay is a stand up guy. I also think he's pretty honest, and he's been in the industry a long, long time!

DarkJedi 10-06-2011 07:32 AM

Proof or ban.

ajrocks 10-06-2011 07:35 AM

The the immortal words of guerillatraffic.com, it was a rogue designer

CaptainHowdy 10-06-2011 07:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18472958)
I think Jay is a stand up guy. I also think he's pretty honest, and he's been in the industry a long, long time!

That kind of mentality paved the road to hell around here ...

EddyTheDog 10-06-2011 07:40 AM

I don't know or care about JL, but using the guys poor English as a way to discredit him is bad form.

In case you did not know WWW stands for World Wide Web.

CyberHustler 10-06-2011 07:49 AM

What's so hard to believe about this story? Sounds exactly like some shit that WOULD happen in this industry. Needs more proof though.

nation-x 10-06-2011 07:58 AM

I want to have sex with Jay's wife... there I said it.

porno jew 10-06-2011 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18472958)
I think Jay is a stand up guy. I also think he's pretty honest, and he's been in the industry a long, long time!

unintentionally self-parodic.

L-Pink 10-06-2011 09:36 AM

So where's this thread going?

.

BareBacked 10-06-2011 09:50 AM

You would think if that was the case they would convert better

ShowMe69 10-06-2011 10:36 AM

Might be true, might not
but like everybody said where is the proof

Have to admit though I don't like their traffic

Eric 10-06-2011 11:02 AM

No Proof = Ban.

tigermtb 10-06-2011 11:19 AM

We properly credit all of our Publishers, and all Advertisers clearly see the sources of the traffic they buy with us. I'm sorry, but there's nothing true about these claims.

This client refunded some spots last week so I contacted them asking what problem they were having. They replied with an email telling me we were a scam, and they threatened to slander us if we did not come up with a "solution" to their problem ... they demanded I "come clean" about the "scam" and refused to tell me what the actual problem was.

So, instead of actually telling me what was going on, or showing me ANY data about whatever he was talking about ... they've come here to complain and slander us on GFY.

Its difficult to read what they've written due to their english .. but they are clearly upset that their website is not earning as much as it used to.

It actually sounds like user error. There's no way the "wrong code" ends up on someone's site, unless they put it there themselves.

Furthermore, this client says we refused to pay him?? What?
They were paid on October 3, 2011 AND April 2, 2011 ... on time, every time.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123