| Redrob |
09-26-2011 10:06 PM |
The Adult Performers Association and .XXX sTLD, related twins?
The blog is titled "The .XXX Debate, as delivered by a woman named January Seraph"
Quote:
Yet, support of Stuart Lawley?s moneymaking .XXX sTLD?s and anti sentiment towards FSC does not at all seem like a positive start. It seems a very obvious split in alliance to work from inside the adult industry, yet cozy up next to non-industry people who do not care for the industry overall.
A very overt emphasis of negativity towards FSC was on display when Seraph?s only reference to Diane Duke in her tweets was a dig at Duke?s not being ?classy? in something Duke said, without actually stating what Duke said that was not-so-classy. Seraph also didn?t reference FSC?s twitter ID at all, while .XXX and Stuart Lawley?s twitter ID?s were used consistently. I don?t understand the blatant snubbing of FSC when it is trying very hard to fill the gaps with a responsible and ethical system to replace AIM during a time when the industry is being attacked on all sides and needs a solid testing system in place. As witnessed recently through FSC?s Adult Production Health and Safety Services (APHSS) and AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF)/Talent Testing Services? (TTS) exchange with Patient Alpha and the press, APHSS was able to halt production and run several tests that now document Patient Alpha as negative for HIV, while AHF took rumors and ran with headline stories without actual proof that there was absolutely an HIV positive performer. In fact, they ran with an ?outbreak? story. Why would any industry person support companies that gouge the business and run hysterically with any information given them?
|
A very interesting read for sure.:2 cents:
Link to Article
No Fear, Just Knowledge.:pimp |
