GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Two and a Half Men didnt impress me... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1038726)

beks001 09-19-2011 06:50 PM

Two and a Half Men didnt impress me...
 
I wasn't to happy about the season opener...kinda slow IMO. Will it be better or tank? What do ya think?

Spunky 09-19-2011 06:52 PM

I think it will slowly tank with a opener like that

ING82 09-19-2011 07:00 PM

Charlie WAS the show. They should just cancel it.

sandman! 09-19-2011 07:00 PM

the episode was lame...........

DBS.US 09-19-2011 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ING82 (Post 18438366)
Charlie WAS the show. They should just cancel it.

Yes:thumbsup

MrBottomTooth 09-19-2011 07:06 PM

Anyone watching the roast... looks like mike Tyson is wasted.

bronco67 09-19-2011 07:14 PM

This sums up Two and Half Men

http://www.collegehumor.com/video/59...en-groan-track

The Porn Nerd 09-19-2011 07:18 PM

So they thought showing us Ashton Cocker naked fifty times would make us want to watch the show without Charlie? Are they going for the 'Sex In The City' gay audience?

Bring back that Candy chick, the one who was married to Alan, and have her naked I'd watch every fucking episode.

sperbonzo 09-19-2011 07:18 PM

Yeah. Not great. The roast is much better so far

Rochard 09-19-2011 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody (Post 18438395)
So they thought showing us Ashton Cocker naked fifty times would make us want to watch the show without Charlie? Are they going for the 'Sex In The City' gay audience?

Bring back that Candy chick, the one who was married to Alan, and have her naked I'd watch every fucking episode.

Yes please!

http://www.goozex.com/community/cfs-...2D00_550x0.jpg

L-Pink 09-19-2011 07:45 PM

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh Tyson WTF? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

.

BlackCrayon 09-19-2011 08:36 PM

the roast as pretty good.

gideongallery 09-19-2011 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18438418)

she is in a show called drop dead diva

series co-star

GAMEFINEST 09-19-2011 09:24 PM

roast was sicc

garce 09-19-2011 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ING82 (Post 18438366)
Charlie WAS the show. They should just cancel it.

As odd as this may sound to many of you, Two and a Half Men is Jon Cryer's show. Pretty well every story line since the show hit the air has centered around Alan. Charlie was there for comedic relief - and to stir up shit and publicity.

Until the last couple of seasons, there were very, very few story lines centred around Charlie Harper.

From his divorce, to hoping for a reconciliation with his estranged wife; from trying to be a weekend father to Jake, to his financial and professional problems... the show is 100% based around Jon Cryer.

Charlie Sheen (whom I DO love) was no more than a comedic foil to Jon Cryer's straight man. Just so happens that Charlie did such a brilliant job as the comedic foil that he ended up - if not completely dominating the show - garnering all of the publicity, and most of the money. While Two and a Half Men may be Jon Cryer's show, it would not have worked without the completely concious-free train wreck that is Charle Sheen.

Moving on:

Except for Charlie's visits with Jane Lynch (as his therapist) and Charlie's relationship with Chelsea and that ridiculously contrived "marraige storyline", Charlie Sheen was never more than a stupid drunk who would crack jokes at his brother's expense. Seriously, Charlie Harper was the oblivious, drunk idiot whom the mayhem of reality unfolded around. He remained drunk and cracked jokes while the people closest to him struggled with some very serious problems. Not just Alan; but Bertha, and Jake.

Shame to say, but that inability to grasp the reality of his situation followed Charlie Sheen into real life.

The show was about a down on his luck everyman; a pussy-whipped geek (Jon Cryer). He had to move in with his superficial, unjustifiaby wealthy brother after his marraige broke down. The show was never about Charlie Sheen -but by sheer strength of personality, Charlie Sheen took it over.

It IS Jon Cryer's show. I did not have the chance to watch it tonight, but I hope Ashton can fill Charlie's shoes. I like that guy - but I've been watching Charlie Sheen for over 30 years. I may be biased.

In summation: Two and a Half Men is Jon Cryer's show. That is not a bad thing. Ducky!!!



I guess you had to grow up in the 80's...

garce 09-19-2011 09:28 PM

I'm just going to re-iterate the fact that Two and a Half Men IS Jon Cryer's show - and I have the new season premiere on PVR. So I do not care what you have to say.

porno jew 09-19-2011 09:33 PM

Jon Cryer is such an annoying faggot.

glowlite 09-19-2011 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beks001 (Post 18438353)
I wasn't to happy about the season opener...kinda slow IMO. Will it be better or tank? What do ya think?

Pathetic IMO, Jon Cryer rocks as always. kutcher added very very little (if anything). CBS failed on this one.

glowlite 09-19-2011 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18438572)
Jon Cryer is such an annoying faggot.

So are you butt munch.

Horny Dude 09-20-2011 12:19 AM

I liked it, think it has some potential.

topwebmodels_chris 09-20-2011 12:21 AM

I guess Ashton should go back to his show, "Punked"

cooldude7 09-20-2011 12:22 AM

havent seen the latest version., yet.
but surely will miss charlie.

cooldude7 09-20-2011 12:27 AM

yeah kandi is fuckin hot
http://www.dudeonthebus.com/wp-conte...dahalfmen3.jpg

georgeyw 09-20-2011 03:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by topwebmodels_chris (Post 18438782)
I guess Ashton should go back to his show, "Punked"

I feel like i'm being punked watching this shit.

Ashton is an ass clown!

seeandsee 09-20-2011 03:58 AM

i got bored after few minutes of new fucker... dont like it...

georgeyw 09-20-2011 04:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seeandsee (Post 18438983)
i got bored after few minutes of new fucker... dont like it...

You can actually see Ashton waiting for his line.

CamTraffic 09-20-2011 04:17 AM

Not winning

Phoenix 09-20-2011 04:49 AM

i didnt watch it...i did watch the roast though.

tyson was hammered for sure..lol

Slick 09-20-2011 05:32 AM

Jon Cryer is good, BUT he's not interesting enough to carry the show and although I kinda like Ashton's kinda stupid'ish character persona, which he does well in "That 70s Show" and "Dude, Where's My Car", I'm just not sure if both of them together will be able to carry the show. I do think it's kinda stupid how they have him as a billionaire because he sold a domain to Microsoft, it doesn't make sense.

Shey 09-20-2011 06:15 AM

I'm into 5 minutes of their scene in the bar and haven't even cracked a smile.

TurboAngel 09-20-2011 06:22 AM

Getting ready to watch it now.

Casanova 09-20-2011 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beks001 (Post 18438353)
I wasn't to happy about the season opener...kinda slow IMO. Will it be better or tank? What do ya think?

I agree. Without Charlie, it's a disaster

marketsmart 09-20-2011 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by garce (Post 18438561)
As odd as this may sound to many of you, Two and a Half Men is Jon Cryer's show. Pretty well every story line since the show hit the air has centered around Alan. Charlie was there for comedic relief - and to stir up shit and publicity.

Until the last couple of seasons, there were very, very few story lines centred around Charlie Harper.

From his divorce, to hoping for a reconciliation with his estranged wife; from trying to be a weekend father to Jake, to his financial and professional problems... the show is 100% based around Jon Cryer.

Charlie Sheen (whom I DO love) was no more than a comedic foil to Jon Cryer's straight man. Just so happens that Charlie did such a brilliant job as the comedic foil that he ended up - if not completely dominating the show - garnering all of the publicity, and most of the money. While Two and a Half Men may be Jon Cryer's show, it would not have worked without the completely concious-free train wreck that is Charle Sheen.

Moving on:

Except for Charlie's visits with Jane Lynch (as his therapist) and Charlie's relationship with Chelsea and that ridiculously contrived "marraige storyline", Charlie Sheen was never more than a stupid drunk who would crack jokes at his brother's expense. Seriously, Charlie Harper was the oblivious, drunk idiot whom the mayhem of reality unfolded around. He remained drunk and cracked jokes while the people closest to him struggled with some very serious problems. Not just Alan; but Bertha, and Jake.

Shame to say, but that inability to grasp the reality of his situation followed Charlie Sheen into real life.

The show was about a down on his luck everyman; a pussy-whipped geek (Jon Cryer). He had to move in with his superficial, unjustifiaby wealthy brother after his marraige broke down. The show was never about Charlie Sheen -but by sheer strength of personality, Charlie Sheen took it over.

It IS Jon Cryer's show. I did not have the chance to watch it tonight, but I hope Ashton can fill Charlie's shoes. I like that guy - but I've been watching Charlie Sheen for over 30 years. I may be biased.

In summation: Two and a Half Men is Jon Cryer's show. That is not a bad thing. Ducky!!!



I guess you had to grow up in the 80's...


do you beat off thinking about this guy?

sounds like you have a man crush on Cryer...






.

Sid70 09-20-2011 07:16 AM

Totally OK in my record. Of course I miss Charlie too...

F-U-Jimmy 09-20-2011 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody (Post 18438395)

Bring back that Candy chick, the one who was married to Alan, and have her naked I'd watch every fucking episode.

:2 cents::thumbsup

pamon 09-20-2011 07:31 AM

Charlie scored 100mm from warner bros in that lawsuit. Winning. The show will tank. Ashton can't carry a show and neither can jon cryer..

astronaut x 09-20-2011 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by topwebmodels_chris (Post 18438782)
I guess Ashton should go back to his show, "Punked"

How do you know were not getting punked right now?

John-ACWM 09-20-2011 08:23 AM

I have to see it for myself but Charlie sure was the show.

justinsain 09-20-2011 08:25 AM

I never watched the show when it was in primetime but I've been watching reruns now that its in a time slot where I sit in front of the TV. I like the show and I think its written well. I've always wondered if Charlie had a hand in casting because every hot A, B, C, D, list actress has been on the show. :)

It really sucks to lose Charlie but I think the new show did an adequate job of writing him out. I'm willing to give Ashton a chance to try and fill the void and let the show go in a slightly different direction. It probably won't be as good but still worth watching.

I'm more concerned with the kid character. Catching up with reruns its easy to see the kid was much funnier the younger he was. I don't see him adding as much to the household dynamic as he did in earlier episodes. Perhaps they could send him off to college and write in a kid from Ashton't past.

I'd say the show has already peaked but they just might get by with enough to make it salvageable.

_Richard_ 09-20-2011 09:26 AM

heard something about kutcher being naked more than once

BURN

martinsc 09-20-2011 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18438418)

yummy! :thumbsup

TurboAngel 09-20-2011 10:14 AM

Ok that was lame.

:(

CDSmith 09-20-2011 10:26 AM

I think Walden (Kutcher) and Judith are going to hook up this season.

And Alan, because of it, is going to implode into a black hole of gayness.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123