nude vs non nude content
 

nude vs non nude content
what is better on my site nude or non nude

would it be better to run non nude on my site with a link to a paid sign up to get nude
or
run nude content on my site with a link to sign up to more nude content

my thinking is if i run only non nude content on site then people are more likely to sign up for nude content

NN content is too 2001

Keep telling yourself that while I stuff my pockets. :winkwink:

50/50 ............

They both equally have appeal ...

And we convert both :)

Some people are desperate to see a certain girl nude, you see these people regularly on forums begging to see nudes of a particular girl. Once they have see the nudity they quickly lose interest.

If you give some nudity away for free then less people will sign up :2 cents:

i have been always thinking nn is just one of the steps to become a pornstar ... at least in most of cases ... if you look young, why to jump to nude and hardcore, better is to feed the horny surfer with your nice body and nice sexy underwear, then you can start offering some specials like seethru or nipslips or topless, then nude then toys then lesbian then straight then gangbang then fetish and so :) just, i know models that went that directions ... :) and about your question if to offer nn and then sign to nude, it depends on your traffic. if you have nonnude seo traffic people are looking for nonnude, so of course send them to nonnude as they will not signup to nude :winkwink: :2 cents: have luck with your business! :thumbsup

great advice thank you

That's good advice from TeenCat. You can keep giving people a little bit more, every 6 months or so, slowly move things up a level. Look at what Peachez did, that worked very well. The question is, did she go too far eventually, I don't know the answer to that. It would be interesting to do a comparison between Kari Sweets and Peachez

thanks i was thin king the same run 2 sites and compare

One thing I would say is that there's a shortage of good non nude sites at the moment, there are a number of good ones, but not enough, so if you were to have a good non nude website by default almost all non nude webmasters would jump onboard.

Once you have built up a fan base, then slowly start to show a bit more, but always try to leave some mystery if you can, it keeps people coming back for more.

LOL, Kari sweets is like in her 30's now isn't she? Now Emily18 is even starting to show her age.... she used to look very young 4-5 years back when she launched.

Images isn't the push anymore - bandwidth and content has changed - use the images to push the videos. The latest smart phones can almost do what a D50 can do in broad daylight or good lighting, every niche is well covered and even microniches are covered top to bottom. Now video on the other hand.. that's different.

I still wonder how CJs still manage to survive these days - redirected traffic is useless.

either way... it all smells of wee... Really... just sniff... it stinks...

Some of the girls are getting older for sure, but it would be interesting to know which strategy worked best; was it better for Kari Sweets who kept Non Nude (just about) or was it Peachez who eventually did just about everything.

I've seen different opinions on the images Vs videos debate; some are convinced it's all about videos while others are convinced the exact opposite. For me I go 50% images and 50% videos and both seem to sell. I see what you mean that videos aren't covered in every niche, that's a good point! :thumbsup

Not everyone want's to immediately see a girl vomiting on a cock or having 2 cocks in her ass.