Is the SEC Covering Up Wall Street Crimes?
 

Imagine a world in which a man who is repeatedly investigated for a string of serious crimes, but never prosecuted, has his slate wiped clean every time the cops fail to make a case. No more Lifetime channel specials where the murderer is unveiled after police stumble upon past intrigues in some old file ? "Hey, chief, didja know this guy had two wives die falling down the stairs?" No more burglary sprees cracked when some sharp cop sees the same name pop up in one too many witness statements. This is a different world, one far friendlier to lawbreakers, where even the suspicion of wrongdoing gets wiped from the record.

That, it now appears, is exactly how the Securities and Exchange Commission has been treating the Wall Street criminals who cratered the global economy a few years back.

Story continues here...

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...k=mostpopular3

yes they do...if you do some digging you can also find evidence that in WTC 7 there was a secret service investigation held there into the SEC and other organizations.

if you are a conspiracy theorist, you could say that is one reason wtc 7 had to come down.
if you are close minded fool, you will jump up and down and scream lunatic to anyone wondering aloud and asking questions to the "official" story

if the sec simply deletes the data, as the article claims, why the need to create a hugely complex elaborate scheme to *destroy* the data in a wtc7 building demolition?

I like watching Weeds on Showtime!

I thought this was about college football.

:1orglaugh

+1 sir. :thumbsup

sec tries to protect themselves sure

doesn't stop someone else from trying to collect evidence on them, in anyway they can

and im not saying the SEC destroyed the world trade center..lol
just the fact is, secret service was housing an on going investigation into almost every senior person at the SEC and some other organizations and families.
I often ask myself, why wasn't there back up of all the investigations?
maybe there was...on a whole other floor.
fact is we will never have an educated estimate of what actually happened, as the rubble was never allowed to be studied by anyone other then a few government shills. And that was only very briefly.
anyway....im not going to get drawn into a discussion about this.
you are free to use your inet to seek what you can to refute my claims here.
i wont be back to support them or dispute you.

i was just curious, i wouldn't try and refute any of that, i wouldn't know. i just try to stick with what i do know and try and see better the sort of thing you are suggesting.

lol this was what I was thinking too

"Is the SEC Covering Up Wall Street Crimes?"

Yes.

This is all a huge fucking scam. I don't think it was this article, but Rolling Stone did another one a few months ago that talked about two women who got tens of millions of "investment money" from the government - risk free, meaning they didn't really need to pay it back. They bought some "school loans" with this money but mostly juw blew the money. What a fucking joke.

Historically the SEC has never effectively policed the street. The first SEC chairman in 1933 was a crook named joe kennedy. Its hard to police people who can buy you a ferrari with their pocket change.