GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Interesting move by ICM (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1035623)

baddog 08-25-2011 03:46 PM

Interesting move by ICM
 
They have a list of hundreds, possibly thousands of celebrities that have had their names permanently banned from the new .xxx adults-only internet domain at no cost to them.

Quote:

El Reg can reveal that everyone from Justin Bieber to Piers Morgan has had their .xxx address placed into a permanent "reserved" status by the registry manager, ICM Registry.
I wonder ow this is going to work out for them.

Source

looky_lou 08-25-2011 03:58 PM

Nice that they are able to pick the winners and the losers in this. Just like the fucking government.

Klen 08-25-2011 04:02 PM

Lol they blocked osamabinladen.xxx

Domain Diva 08-25-2011 04:05 PM

I think this is a smart move that they planned well in advance.

The celeb domains would have given them a headace so instead thier PR dept say they will hold them...but think about it more and you will realise that these names are popular and will produce traffic, so they will put paid links or some type of parking system into place to make sure they actually make $$$$ even if its only promoting ICM.

Socks 08-25-2011 04:18 PM

"reserved"

They mean they're putting them into the cellar to age like fine wine.

Barry-xlovecam 08-25-2011 04:34 PM

They were afraid of the litigation expense perhaps ...

baddog 08-25-2011 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Domain Diva (Post 18380529)
I think this is a smart move that they planned well in advance.

The celeb domains would have given them a headace so instead thier PR dept say they will hold them...but think about it more and you will realise that these names are popular and will produce traffic, so they will put paid links or some type of parking system into place to make sure they actually make $$$$ even if its only promoting ICM.

That could probably be said about any domain that was protected. I wonder if an attorney could argue that a precedent has been set and that copyright holders should expect the same courtesy.

LeRoy 08-25-2011 04:42 PM

So no baddog.xxx ???

porno jew 08-25-2011 04:45 PM

great move. thanks for the free icm promo.

baddog 08-25-2011 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeRoy (Post 18380591)
So no baddog.xxx ???

That is what I am wondering. Will my name be protected?

baddog 08-25-2011 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18380596)
great move. thanks for the free icm promo.

How exactly was that a promotion?

Redrob 08-25-2011 04:58 PM

Quote:

Hundreds, possibly thousands of celebrities have had their names permanently banned from the new .xxx adults-only internet domain.

El Reg can reveal that everyone from Justin Bieber to Piers Morgan has had their .xxx address placed into a permanent "reserved" status by the registry manager, ICM Registry.

This means that cybersquatters or crafty porn webmasters will not be able to register domains such as Beyonce.xxx or BritneySpears.xxx to drive traffic to their sites.

It also means that many celebrities will not have to pay to protect their personal brands in the forthcoming .xxx "sunrise period" or take cybersquatters to court in future.
Link to Article

If ICM doesn't offer the same service to adult stars, the action shows they don't respect adult stars the same as regular celebrities.


Again, it show how little they have in common with our industry.

Personally, looks to me like the adult stars are about to be :boid.......

Just my opinion....

baddog 08-25-2011 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redrob (Post 18380609)
Link to Article

If ICM doesn't offer the same service to adult stars, the action shows they don't respect adult stars the same as regular celebrities.


Again, it show how little they have in common with our industry.

Personally, looks to me like the adult stars are about to be :boid.......

Just my opinion....

Even more so, what about pepsi.xxx or toyrus.xxx or anyone/thing else that has a trademark. Sorry, realize I said copyright above, meant trademark.

spazlabz 08-25-2011 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18380575)
That could probably be said about any domain that was protected. I wonder if an attorney could argue that a precedent has been set and that copyright holders should expect the same courtesy.

I too am curious about this... damn why did I drop out of law school! :mad:

Domain Diva 08-25-2011 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18380575)
That could probably be said about any domain that was protected. I wonder if an attorney could argue that a precedent has been set and that copyright holders should expect the same courtesy.

Well its still a win-win for ICM in my view.

First they ask everyone to pay to protect thier domains and those bigger trademark holders or corps with good lawyers who object get the " ok we will protect it from registration deal" making it look like they are doing something to address the issue. Following this expect some type of page saying protected from registration with links or ICM promotion.

Using this method would make for a great excuse to have thier logo or links on pages such as pepsi and coke for example.

Dont be surprised if you see them offer all types of sweet deals , I think they have this all planned out from every angle.

PornMD 08-25-2011 07:02 PM

From a legal standpoint, it should be all or nothing. Either they grant every trademark holder the right to block their name from registration for free, or they don't grant any trademark holder that courtesy. They're going to attract a bigger shitstorm than they had been.

BlackCrayon 08-25-2011 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornMD (Post 18380824)
From a legal standpoint, it should be all or nothing. Either they grant every trademark holder the right to block their name from registration for free, or they don't grant any trademark holder that courtesy. They're going to attract a bigger shitstorm than they had been.

yep, i don't see how they can pick and choose what to protect and what not to.

baddog 08-25-2011 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornMD (Post 18380824)
From a legal standpoint, it should be all or nothing. Either they grant every trademark holder the right to block their name from registration for free, or they don't grant any trademark holder that courtesy. They're going to attract a bigger shitstorm than they had been.

My point exactly.

PiracyPitbull 08-25-2011 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornMD (Post 18380824)
From a legal standpoint, it should be all or nothing. Either they grant every trademark holder the right to block their name from registration for free, or they don't grant any trademark holder that courtesy. They're going to attract a bigger shitstorm than they had been.


one can hope :disgust

though, that whole deal smells of the foulest shit.

V_RocKs 08-25-2011 08:55 PM

From a legal standpoint they don't have to do shit... Domain names are not real estate...

will76 08-25-2011 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18380501)
They have a list of hundreds, possibly thousands of celebrities that have had their names permanently banned from the new .xxx adults-only internet domain at no cost to them.



I wonder ow this is going to work out for them.

Source

sets a precedent for others, how can they do that for free for celebrities but black male others, including companies ?

will76 08-25-2011 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Domain Diva (Post 18380733)
Well its still a win-win for ICM in my view.

First they ask everyone to pay to protect thier domains and those bigger trademark holders or corps with good lawyers who object get the " ok we will protect it from registration deal" making it look like they are doing something to address the issue. Following this expect some type of page saying protected from registration with links or ICM promotion.

Using this method would make for a great excuse to have thier logo or links on pages such as pepsi and coke for example.

Dont be surprised if you see them offer all types of sweet deals , I think they have this all planned out from every angle.

from my view, they are so stupid and ill planned they couldn't punch themselves out of a wet paper bag. It really looks like they are making up shit as they go along.

Rochard 08-25-2011 09:40 PM

So celebrities don't have to pay, but everyone else does.

baddog 08-25-2011 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18380988)
So celebrities don't have to pay, but everyone else does.

Some celebs, not all.

Redrob 08-26-2011 06:18 AM

To me, it looks like discrimination at its worse......a real putdown for adult stars and starlets telling them they don't rate an exemption.

pornguy 08-26-2011 06:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 18380575)
That could probably be said about any domain that was protected. I wonder if an attorney could argue that a precedent has been set and that copyright holders should expect the same courtesy.

I agree with you on that thought and hope it happens.. it would be a slap in the face to them.

Barry-xlovecam 08-26-2011 06:37 AM

Money, guns and lawyers ...

Money talks and bullshit walks.

There are no principles nor ethics involved in this .xxx matter.

ottopottomouse 08-26-2011 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PornMD (Post 18380824)
From a legal standpoint, it should be all or nothing. Either they grant every trademark holder the right to block their name from registration for free, or they don't grant any trademark holder that courtesy. They're going to attract a bigger shitstorm than they had been.

+1
can't see who is going to put up the money to challenge it though compared to the size of the blocking fee.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123