GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Jail For Embedding YouTube Videos? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1025104)

wehateporn 06-02-2011 03:55 PM

Jail For Embedding YouTube Videos?
 
Hopefully not

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201...e-videos.shtml

CamTraffic 06-02-2011 03:56 PM

why don't they put the people that uploaded the content in jail or people at youtube?

L-Pink 06-02-2011 04:39 PM

Jail them all, let God sort em out.

FlowerKid 06-02-2011 05:03 PM

Youtube was made by evil i think.

V_RocKs 06-02-2011 05:20 PM

I fell asleep

d-null 06-02-2011 05:27 PM

in adult, I believe many webmasters are taking a big chance in embedding videos from some of the big tube sites, if something can be proven to be illegal and you have been embedding the video on your site, it might be easier to prosecute a webmaster living in a western country that is embedding that video rather than bother to go after some corporation running a tube site out of a third world country :2 cents:

Barry-xlovecam 06-02-2011 06:36 PM

Probably die in committee.

Should it pass somehow ? with regard to youtube there is little basis of mens ria

As for the embedding of infringing adult tube site videos ? that is another story; "knowingly" v. some spotty compliance with DMCA ? something to argue with before a Court.

HerPimp 06-02-2011 07:11 PM

damn shame

d-null 06-02-2011 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 18190374)


As for the embedding of infringing adult tube site videos ? that is another story; "knowingly" v. some spotty compliance with DMCA ? something to argue with before a Court.

I was thinking along the lines of someone running their autofed tube script that might embed a video from a big tube called something like "Teen webcam to her boyfriend" and it turns out she is underage and there is no 2257, shouldn't every webmaster that irresponsibly sets up a tube script to blindly embed videos possibly face legal action in that kind of situation?

ignorance is not a defence when it comes to that kind of thing I don't believe

Barry-xlovecam 06-02-2011 10:34 PM

Regardless of §2257, rebroadcasting of underage sexually explicit image is unlawful

§ 2252. Certain activities relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minors

Quote:

(c) Affirmative Defense.? It shall be an affirmative defense to a charge of violating paragraph (4) of subsection (a) that the defendant?
(1) possessed less than three matters containing any visual depiction proscribed by that paragraph; and
(2) promptly and in good faith, and without retaining or allowing any person, other than a law enforcement agency, to access any visual depiction or copy thereof?
(A) took reasonable steps to destroy each such visual depiction; or
(B) reported the matter to a law enforcement agency and afforded that agency access to each such visual depiction.


Agent 488 06-02-2011 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d-null (Post 18190533)
I was thinking along the lines of someone running their autofed tube script that might embed a video from a big tube called something like "Teen webcam to her boyfriend" and it turns out she is underage and there is no 2257, shouldn't every webmaster that irresponsibly sets up a tube script to blindly embed videos possibly face legal action in that kind of situation?

ignorance is not a defence when it comes to that kind of thing I don't believe

already happened .......

AdultKing 06-02-2011 11:26 PM

Wont apply to the rest of the world though, so no worries from Australia.

onwebcam 06-02-2011 11:42 PM

Can someone please tell these people to go home. Their services are no longer needed.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123