Do you believe stephen hawking ?
 

Just watched 2 of his shows.
The 1 about timetravelling and the 1 about alien life.

Brilliant.

He is interesting, to be sure/

At least the one show was not about AlienQ
;-)

Stephen Hawking does not believe in creation, so no I can't take anything he says seriously

he changed his theory make him popular about black holes time traveling so i dont know what he talks now...

I dont believe in him. I think he is a cleverly designed automatron, disguised as a human. He voice gives it away...

Creation is a joke. We were cavemen and aliens came down and tinkered with us. Aliens are the missing link.

The shows are awesome, very interesting. We may be able to grasp the concept of what the man is talking about. But, the fully thought out ideas in his head are probably beyond us all.

So how do you explain our imperfection and the evil in the world without the Adam and Eve / Apple scenario?

Hawking Rawks. He's our generation's Einstein, and he contributes so much to the world of science despite an incredibly awful disease.

No this is not correct. His change of mind has nothing to do with time travel. Hawking had believed that anything swallowed by a black hole was forever hidden from the outside universe. John Preskill, a theoretical physicist at the California Institute of Technology, bet that the information carried by an object was not destroyed when it entered a black hole and could actually be recovered. 30 years after the initial bet, Preskill proved him wrong, and won the bet.

Yea in YOUR FACE MOTHER FUCKER!!!!!!!!

:mad: :pimp

yeah he's brilliant


you are not

well I never.... maybe you have been tinkered with but not ME!!! :1orglaugh

it was this guy:

http://www.amazon.com/Black-Hole-War.../dp/0316016403

and the argument was about conservation of matter. now the theory is that reality is a 2 dimensional hologram on the edge of a black hole, with black holes at the center of every Galaxy, and there are 11 dimensions. we experience only 5... think suskind was one of the thinkers behine string theroy as well, but now hawkings is putting out M theroy

As far as I know he's composing music too - classic sonettes or something like that.
He also has some interests in other areas like: architecture and economics....

Stephen Hawking is over-rated

correction. steve hawkings DOES beleive in creation. Just not the one found in a book written by a bunch of wack-jobs... you know... the book where the guy was suppose to have lived inside a whale for a few days... yea that book where the guy killed 140K people with a donkey jaw-bone.... that same book that has caused more death than oh I dont know.... every disease ever known to mankind....

Yes B hawkings believes in creation... just not the way you might. he takes a little more... well, provable approach?

well then if man was NOT created from dirt, how come there is still dirt?

actually some real logic flaws in that statement

sometimes he makes sense, most of the time he don't

LOLZ :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

proof right there man is still a caveman! :upsidedow

And a retarded one too.

I feel sorry for you if trust fake science more than the truth of the bible.

Why do we have monkeys still in the forest if we are monkeys?

How come women have ribs if the rib that was taken from Adam to make Eve is not the truth?

He also sings with Pink Floyd. True.

Please tell me that you're joking around. You can't possibly believe the whole Adam and Eve shit, can you? I hope to hell that you're just fucking around. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Have you ever pondered why one of the world's greatest minds rests in a near useless body while some of the world's greatest athletes can barely carry a thought.

:upsidedow no worries, just getting my daily troll fix

ok, I was hoping that was the case. haha

Is donny long still up? Hi donny, hows the gun practicing going.

I believe he has a much better grasp on physics than I.

there are probably only 20 people on earth that understand modern physics, if that many

The aliens created religion to keep us in line.

What do you think of each of their explanations of what happens to the information? It seems to me Hawking couldn't handle that Preskill was right in the bet, so he came up with his alternate and very far-fetched theory of what happens to the information.

I just posted this thread into the universe

Well there's some new physics theories out that will blow your minds.

Not at all farfetched. He adjusted it, nothing wrong with that as more knowledge comes out by experiments and newer technologies to investigate.

Leonard Susskind came up with the hologram theory, not Hawking's and Hawking's theory, 'M theory' isn't really that far fetched. simply put the theory is that we see what our experience allow us to see and understand, i.e. modal theory.

there are many things happening around us however we can only experience realty through a frame work of 'our' understanding... as our understanding changes the very nature of the universe and reality change as well.

a simple way to relate to modal theory is understanding light, or photons. if an experiment test to see if a photon is a particle, photons are particles. an experiment to test if photons are a wave... photons are a wave.

I don't know what to think of it, the concept is beyond me. My interest in science includes astrophysics, quantum mechanics etc but I am having trouble wrapping my head around their disagreement.

The disagreement is based on Hawkings Belief that once something passes an Event Horizon of a Blackhole it can not be recovered.

The author of the book says it's not true because physics does not account for anything lost. The author of the book also say's that once things go into the Event Horizon it has reached zero time but is not lost and there can be recovered.


Somethings:
Light has mass which is why it bends near Black Holes. It is responsive to gravity.

I am inclined to believe that once mass passes the Event Horizon of a Black hole mass simply behaves differently but still constrained to the rules of Time. Author of the book believes that mass reaches zero time.

Which does not make sense unless of course Black Holes are what makes the universe stable from the outset and a large part of what draws the universe back into a singular point in time. If thats the case then Hawking Theory of a Big Bang is true.

If all the mass in our dimension all comes together eventually at a single point and time which is zero then thats where string theory comes from. Where essentially String Theory says our Dimension/Universe is a pocket of something larger where other dimensions like ours break into existence and out of existence. Which means our existence is repetitive and not unique. Thats right we all been here before.

In short string theory also says that basically our current place in time within our Universe is the perfect time for us to exist because at most all other points in time of this dimension it inhospitable since most other points in time of our dimension are subject to different laws of atomic behavior.

I disagree
 

To discover the truth one must venture inside and you will then see that black holes aren't really black... they're all pink on the inside!

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-O31dPNhASU...a-dentata2.jpg

And this is why GFY is such a special place.

Didn't read the rest of the replies, but link(s) to those vids plz?

In all seriousness. Someone, might have been jacksparrow linked to a 2 hr youtube video about cern and fermilab. It went into black holes and the newer theory about holographic principle/string theory (i forgot what exactly it was called). It was a very good vid.

http://roflrazzi.files.wordpress.com...g-kick-ass.jpg

http://www.gtfo.ro/wp-content/upload...en-hawking.jpg

http://www.blueprintpodcast.com/blog...en-hawking.jpg

Chair jockey gets all the bitches too:

http://www.jaunted.com/files/8223/lido.jpg

http://www.unionversity.com/wp-conte...kingbikini.jpg

http://courseweb.lis.illinois.edu/~w...wkingspins.gif

ADG

I'd do him in the butt.

Hawking's theoretical solution to the information paradox is not 'M theory' and to the best of my very limited understanding on the topic, most physicists currently consider Hawking's information paradox solution theory to be a real stretch.

with that logic all athletes are morons and all people in wheel chairs are geniuses... which would be false...

You dedicate 10 000+ hours to anything and you will be proficient in it.