GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   who already got 3DTV? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1020620)

Peace 05-01-2011 08:32 AM

who already got 3DTV?
 
If you got 3DTVV tell me where do you get content? and how happy you are with it?
Is there a content website where can get it? any porn content available to you?

Peace 05-01-2011 08:51 AM

we only offer anaglieph 3-D for now but if market needs it we will reformat for 3DTV

MrBottomTooth 05-01-2011 10:44 AM

I almost bought one a couple months ago, then I realized my receiver would have to be upgraded as well since the HDMI switching on it was not compatible with the 3D signal. So I said fuck it and saved about $500 by going with a non-3D LED TV.

There's not a lot of content out there other than 1 or 2 speciality channels on satellite, some video games, and the odd blu-ray.

Any 3D porn I have seen is just the shit you use with the red and blue glasses.

Scott McD 05-02-2011 01:56 PM

I still don't have any interest in a 3D tv. Might change my mind down the line but for now HD does me fine!

moeloubani 05-02-2011 02:06 PM

3d wont pick up until you dont need glasses

otherwise its just a bunch of people wearing these $200 glasses to watch a show they could watch anyway in perfect HD without the clunky glasses

96ukssob 05-02-2011 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moeloubani (Post 18103038)
3d wont pick up until you dont need glasses

otherwise its just a bunch of people wearing these $200 glasses to watch a show they could watch anyway in perfect HD without the clunky glasses

:2 cents: :thumbsup

a friend of mine bought one and said he never uses it because he keeps misplacing the glasses.

i wont buy one because my receiver, which I just bought not to long ago, does not support HDMI 1.4 (1.4 = 3D). I could bypass the receiver and run fiberoptic to the receiver and the HDMI straight to the TV, but not worth it until they become glass-less

HardlinkSells 05-02-2011 02:16 PM

I had to pay 85 dollars for the glasses :( I bought one, used it for a month, and returned. Not enough content for me and it ultimately started hurting my eyes.

prezzz 05-02-2011 02:29 PM

I wonder how to use glasses if you already wear 'regular' ones...

Jack Sparrow 05-03-2011 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by prezzz (Post 18103103)
I wonder how to use glasses if you already wear 'regular' ones...

The 3d ones fit over your glasses.:thumbsup

mikesinner 05-03-2011 01:41 AM

Tons of blu rays are available if you want to pay the price.

Seth Manson 05-03-2011 01:42 AM

I have a 3D tv but it not in the bedroom. I'm not going to sit in the living room and jerk off.

Peace 05-11-2011 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seth Manson (Post 18104112)
I have a 3D tv but it not in the bedroom. I'm not going to sit in the living room and jerk off.

You can do when you are along )

Wizzo 05-11-2011 10:38 AM

I have a new Samsung, which from what I understand will display 3d if I wear the glasses, but who wants to do that?

CurrentlySober 05-11-2011 10:38 AM

I cant even afford a normal TV...

Ross 05-11-2011 10:40 AM

I was buying a full new surround sound, receiver and TV for my basement so was very close to getting one. In the end I couldn't justify the cost, so picked up a Bose surround sound with Yamaha receiver and 60inch Plasma. Looks pretty sick. Really glad I didn't spring the extra 1500 bucks for the 3D TV, not to mention it would only have been 55inch.

Failed 05-11-2011 10:41 AM

I specifically bought a tv that wasn't 3D, even though the prices were similar. I just don't care for 3D. I posted in another thread about this too, at about the 20 minute mark of the last 3D movie I saw (Avatar) I took the glasses off to watch the regular version. I find it unappealing and boring.

2MuchMark 05-11-2011 10:57 AM

I gave up shopping for 3D TV's. All the ones I was shown sucked with a blurry image, low refresh rate, too dim, or all of the above, and I'm talking on the best most expensive setups too.

When I watch a movie, I want to be "lost" in the movie - I don't want to be reminded that I'm watching a shitty image with headache inducing flicker.

In my opinion the technology is too new. I'd wait at least another 2 years before picking up a 3D setup.

Seth Manson 05-11-2011 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Failed (Post 18126535)
I specifically bought a tv that wasn't 3D, even though the prices were similar. I just don't care for 3D. I posted in another thread about this too, at about the 20 minute mark of the last 3D movie I saw (Avatar) I took the glasses off to watch the regular version. I find it unappealing and boring.

If you have the 3D version of Avatar and dont like it, I'll buy it from you.

Internet User 05-11-2011 11:48 AM

i got a sony LCD with 3D but it's not being used as there is virtually no 3D content

Cyber Fucker 05-11-2011 04:14 PM

Not yet, but some of my friends already have it. :) I think more will buy it when prices will go a bit lower. That is like with everything new when it hits a market, first only rich can afford it when prices go lower more and more people buy it.

Peace 05-11-2011 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Internet User (Post 18126746)
i got a sony LCD with 3D but it's not being used as there is virtually no 3D content


Interesting to know IT MUST be some sites offering content. May be i should use www.3DContentBroker.com for that idea and collect content producers who offer content?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123