![]() |
Gadhafi's son and 3 grandchildren killed ....
Gadhafi's son and 3 grandchildren killed by NATO bombing. Will he quit or are things about to get worse?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/ml_libya |
Why does it seem the bad guy always gets away these days?
|
I think bombs missed him a few years ago but got a family member.
|
So what now it's okay to kill someone's children to force them to do something? Seems kind of wrong to me, but hey, that's just me!
|
If you killed my son, and there was no law enforcement to apprehend the person(s) responsible (which is the case here), I would not stop trying to kill everyone responsible until I was dead or they were all dead. I can't imagine Gadhafi handling the situation differently. The man won't relent until he's dead.
|
Quote:
|
Unexploded ordinance inside the house...
Let me guess... French Bomb and Pilot. NATO=IDIOTS |
death to tyrants.
|
its not ok! picking on someone that doesnt have equal power.
|
The West will live to regret getting involved in this. Where are they off to next, Syria?
|
Quote:
|
Such foreign conflicts are primarily about access to important resources and strategic reasons - hence the huge involvement of the U.S. in the middle east.
There are far worse countries and leaders, especially in Africa, and yet little to no attention is paid to them - Somalia is a prime example. The U.S. ignores the country and plight of the people there; there was that infamous failed military mission back in the 1990s in Somalia, but that was, imho, intentional as a way to get the heck of out of there... A token mission of sorts, much like Grenada ... make it look like the U.S. fights foreign wars to spread democracy, which the U.S. itself isn't even one (U.S. is a Federal Republic; forefather's didn't trust the masses), when the reality is the exact opposite - the U.S. often desire leaders who are dictators, since they tend to keep tight control over their country while appeasing U.S. interests. With all that said ... it sure appears, at least from a layperson's perspective, that the recent attack was primarily an assassination attempt - if so, that's a very dangerous path to go down, since there's no way to physically protect anyone 100%; assassinations tend to lead to more assassinations. Ron |
+1 Winning NO FLY ZONE
Oh wait, this wan NOT a fly zone... |
Quote:
The US gets most of it's oil from Canada and Mexico. |
I wonder how many sons and grandchildren Gadhafi has killed through his troop's actions.
Oh, suddenly that doesnt count anymore, because it didnt make the headlines. Fucking crybabies. |
He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.
|
Quote:
|
if anyone wants a laugh, googler 'libyan current events 1973', the same number as the UN resolution..
|
Quote:
Im surprised there isnt more outrage. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Did they get Osama? Ofcourse not he's just a figment..
|
same
It is always, same, once NATO can't defeat military , it will start killing civilians and civil infrastructere. I've experienced this ,personally
|
Quote:
You can read more here Great Man-Made River |
Quote:
|
omg
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_reserves_in_Libya |
Quote:
|
Impeach the war criminal Obama!!!!! No blooooooddddddd for oooiiilllllllll!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Quote:
If they don't illegally murder him soon, all countries involved may regret this cluster fuck. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
No oil in Libya? or what? |
This will not end well, this NATO killings must end it...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
A NATO air strike in Tripoli that Libyan officials say killed a son and three grandchildren of leader Muammar Gaddafi was proof the coalition was not protecting civilians, a Russian parliament member said. "(It is) a clear confirmation of the indiscriminate use of force by the anti-Libyan coalition," Konstantin Kosachev told Interfax news agency on Sunday. Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has criticised the Western countries enforcing a no-fly zone over Libya and said they have gone beyond the limits of a U.N. Security Council resolution designed to protect civilians. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...74002M20110501 |
2012 is the end of the world. Gadhafi will somehow be involved, I know it.
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/2858/tinfoilhaty.jpg |
Its so funny how the total western and international media keeps reporting that only millitary targets will be bombed yet this is the 5th time they execute a targetted strike against Gaddafi.
How can you ever believe anything these guys say if they always lie? |
Quote:
Wich they can actualy employ thru your tv screen and the new mandatory lightbulbs. |
After the next 9/11 in the USA , France , UK or Canada :
-' We do not understand why they do that, attacking civilians ... ' .... ' Must be because they hate our FREEDOMS ... ' .... :warning |
Quote:
if some guy rapes your wife , is the solution to go rape his wife ? |
They should have taken him out years ago when Pan Am went down.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I hope the next bomb drops on Gadaffis head.
|
Quote:
The United States has never admitted responsibility, nor apologized to Iran Following the explosion of Pan Am Flight 103 six months later, the British and American governments initially blamed the PFLP-GC, a Palestinian militant group backed by Syria, with assumptions of assistance from Iran in retaliation for Iran Air Flight 655. BUT THEN >>>> The cause of the crash was later determined to be a bomb associated with the Libyan intelligence service. <<<<<<< Motive? |
It says NATO, so why are most of you saying Obama? Prove it first.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123