![]() |
Is Google TOO BIG to fail?
While there are many blogs belly aching about the recent Panda/Farmer/Scraper algo update, an interesting issue is being raised: Is Google Too big to fail?
Source: http://www.stayonsearch.com/google-a...claims-victims Quote:
|
nice article :)
|
It would be hard for them to fail, Start with Building Negative Perceptions.
|
Nothing is ever too big to fail.
|
It would be difficult to imagine the internet as we know it without Google that's for sure!
|
internet was made to be resilient and redundant and decentralized, so no.
|
What's so important about google? It's not like the world economy would collapse if they would go under for some reason...
they have a lot of influence over the internet, but lets be real here, in grand scheme of things they hardly matter at this point... |
The government should take them over.
|
I'm not sure I like the premise of that concept. Too big to fail is when you employ tons of americans or control too large a piece of the economy with your banks financial transactions. Would the internet crumble if google went down? doubtful
|
links pulled.
|
very nice article.,
but i dont understand a shit. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I would welcome an internet without the borg ..I mean Google.
|
Microsoft can't take a chip out of them, not even after they got together with Yahoo.
With 65% of its income spent on its staff and re-invested in development... that is a big wall to knock down. |
was the roman empire too big to fail? nothing lasts forever.
|
Quote:
|
Google is not to big to fail neither to not fail (but this has less chances) and it's already owned by US gov.
Websites are too much dependent on Google traffic and that's the problem. __________________ :warning This is sig area! :warning         &# 160;http://www.zeldauniverse.net/forums/...kiemonster.gif |
Quote:
|
Things can change quickly online, in ways to are currently hard to imagine
|
There are incredibly powerful people who hate Google
Starting with Rupert Murdoch |
the fundamental flaw in the article is that it compares an entire industry to a single company to justify the too big to fail arguement
the problem is that when an entire industry fails (banking) there is no alternative to go to. the difference is if googles search results suddenly don't give you the best results (what your looking for) people will try another search engine. there is no negative cascade effect between search engines. |
Answer=NO |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123