GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   .XXX is a non issue (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1014955)

slapass 03-19-2011 05:21 PM

.XXX is a non issue
 
"Porn site owners won?t have to relinquish their .com or other URLs, and .xxx domains won?t be mandatory for sites with adult content."

Says it all.

http://mashable.com/2011/03/19/xxx-tld-porn/

BFT3K 03-19-2011 09:58 PM

A group of us should petition for a .adu extension just to compete with (and further dilute) this .xxx bullshit. We can state that "the industry" prefers .adu, and go from there.

Deputy Chief Command 03-19-2011 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slapass (Post 17991315)
"Porn site owners won?t have to relinquish their .com or other URLs, and .xxx domains won?t be mandatory for sites with adult content."

Says it all.

http://mashable.com/2011/03/19/xxx-tld-porn/

and you trust the people that are saying that ? the point of concern is that somewhere down the line, they are going to change their words in something along the line of "in todays climate with blahblah, and blahblah, we find it oppurtune, and right now, the blahblah, time is right , to move ALL porn sites to .xxx"

today is today .. just got their approval .. tomorrow is a different story .. one year from now ? are they still going to be saying the same thing ? nobody knows! but those are the fears:2 cents:

just a punk 03-19-2011 10:25 PM

There is no reason to change it in future. Furthermore it's technically and legally impossible.

It's like to force all european owners of .com domains to move their sites into .eu zone. Sounds stupid, right?

Deputy Chief Command 03-19-2011 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyberxxx (Post 17991617)
There is no reason to change it in future. Furthermore it's technically and legally impossible.

It's like to force all european owners of .com domains to move their sites into .eu zone. Sounds stupid, right?

how is it "legally" impossible ? laws are there to be changed ... if right now they could not force you to do so .. who says they are not going to get some new law making it illegal to have porn on .com ? sounds stupid , right ? but who says they wont do that ? if enough people support a ban of porn on .com, who says it wont happen ?

nobody can guarantee that :2 cents:

FetishWeb 03-19-2011 10:33 PM

a non issue for the bro's that helped Lawley behind closed doors maybe but it will be a problem for everyone else.

GatorB 03-19-2011 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slapass (Post 17991315)
"Porn site owners won?t have to relinquish their .com or other URLs, and .xxx domains won?t be mandatory for sites with adult content. YET"

fixed it for you.

gleem 03-19-2011 10:37 PM

Can you imagine the nightmare of all other porn. tld's being forced to move to .xxx, of course your best domains will be taken by someone else who got in .xxx earlier or the regisrar, the only people who win in the end are the lawyers who will be handling the massive influx of lawsuits of .com owners trying to get their .xxx versions back from other people.

cess 03-19-2011 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17991604)
A group of us should petition for a .adu extension just to compete with (and further dilute) this .xxx bullshit. We can state that "the industry" prefers .adu, and go from there.

It would be funny if there was a bunch of other adult domain extensions not by ICM. Who's going to buy .xxx for $70-100 when you could buy .adu,.porn,.sex etc for the same price as .com domains.

Fetish Gimp 03-19-2011 10:43 PM

If governments and ICANN really gave a shit about kids there would be an .kids tld.

The tld would be really cheap so that non-profits could create content specifically for kids, and all content would be kid friendly. So why is nobody doing it?

Quote:

Originally Posted by http://mashable.com/2011/03/19/xxx-tld-porn/
In addition to promising consumers of Internet porn safety from online fraud (including e-mail spoofing, phishing and spam)

This made me laugh.

Redrob 03-19-2011 11:54 PM

No money in .kids in my opinion.

Ron Bennett 03-20-2011 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fetish Gimp (Post 17991629)
If governments and ICANN really gave a shit about kids there would be an .kids tld.

It's been proposed, but gone nowhere due to the complicated issues involved.

Who constitutes a "kid", and even more daunting, what content is suitable for a "kid", since standards varies widely throughout the world - who decides what's suitable, who enforces the standards, etc ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fetish Gimp (Post 17991629)
The tld would be really cheap so that non-profits could create content specifically for kids, and all content would be kid friendly. So why is nobody doing it?

At the global level, .KIDS is far more difficult to implement than .XXX (even that's not a sure thing yet despite the recent vote and could be further delayed), and hence some countries, including the United States, have instead implemented .KIDS at the country level ... for example, there's a .KIDS.US 2nd level ccTLD - http://www.cms.kids.us/forgrownups.html

Ron

just a punk 03-20-2011 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deputy Chief Command (Post 17991620)
how is it "legally" impossible ?

Easily. When you bought the domain, did you see "can't be used for adult sites" in the TOS?

Deputy Chief Command 03-20-2011 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyberxxx (Post 17991746)
Easily. When you bought the domain, you see "can't be used for adult sites" in the TOS?

lol... I hope this is not a serious reply :thumbsup

Davy 03-20-2011 02:48 AM

.XXX is for stupid people.

Kiopa_Matt 03-20-2011 02:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyberxxx (Post 17991617)
There is no reason to change it in future.

Of course there's a reason to change it. To line ICM's pockets. It's already going to be $60 fee to registrars to register a .xxx that technically costs ~$0.50. Talk about margins!

Why not try to force everyone into it?

Chosen 03-20-2011 03:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slapass (Post 17991315)
"Porn site owners won’t have to relinquish their .com or other URLs, and .xxx domains won’t be mandatory for sites with adult content."

Says it all.

http://mashable.com/2011/03/19/xxx-tld-porn/

I hope it will stay like that forever...

cooldude7 03-20-2011 07:37 AM

this is good news.

BFT3K 03-20-2011 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cess (Post 17991627)
It would be funny if there was a bunch of other adult domain extensions not by ICM. Who's going to buy .xxx for $70-100 when you could buy .adu,.porn,.sex etc for the same price as .com domains.

That is one of the BEST ways to dilute this obnoxious new extension. :thumbsup

woj 03-20-2011 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyberxxx (Post 17991617)
There is no reason to change it in future. Furthermore it's technically and legally impossible.

It's like to force all european owners of .com domains to move their sites into .eu zone. Sounds stupid, right?

when it comes to porn and right wing politicians, ANYTHING is possible...

F-U-Jimmy 03-20-2011 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17992065)
That is one of the BEST ways to dilute this obnoxious new extension. :thumbsup

If you have $50,000 to $70,000 to spare give it to me and ill start the ball rolling for you :1orglaugh

Redrob 03-20-2011 10:56 AM

IMHO, I like .redrob :winkwink:

BlackCrayon 03-20-2011 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ron Bennett (Post 17991734)
It's been proposed, but gone nowhere due to the complicated issues involved.

Who constitutes a "kid", and even more daunting, what content is suitable for a "kid", since standards varies widely throughout the world - who decides what's suitable, who enforces the standards, etc ...



At the global level, .KIDS is far more difficult to implement than .XXX (even that's not a sure thing yet despite the recent vote and could be further delayed), and hence some countries, including the United States, have instead implemented .KIDS at the country level ... for example, there's a .KIDS.US 2nd level ccTLD - http://www.cms.kids.us/forgrownups.html

Ron

sounds like you're a supporter of .xxx by some of the posts i've read..

a 'seperate' internet for kids is ideal, sites would have to be approved and it would be lucrative for those in that industry.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123