Cool. The only people that have to worry are the ones with bullshit sites. Guys that actually work on their sites will prosper. Just like we always have anyway.
you would think but i got some of my original content sites taken out by the latest algo changes. the google algo isn't perfect.
I think there is more going on in the way of algorithm changes than they are disclosing. I've seen evidence that there have also been some changes to how they are counting certain back links. The changes seem to make sense but the problem is they aren't perfect and some people will get caught in the middle of them without actually doing anything questionable.
You don't like my posts? Put me on ignore or fuck right off. I'll say what I want.
I think there is more going on in the way of algorithm changes than they are disclosing. I've seen evidence that there have also been some changes to how they are counting certain back links. The changes seem to make sense but the problem is they aren't perfect and some people will get caught in the middle of them without actually doing anything questionable.
yeah some of my sites were collateral damage as nothing was shady about them. google will never give as response why either and bing/yahoo traffic is a joke. bah ...
you would think but i got some of my original content sites taken out by the latest algo changes. the google algo isn't perfect.
same here
Free traffic and backlinks from one of the fastest growing adult pinsites on the net - SAUCY PICTURES!
Easily my best performing webcam sponsor - CLICK HERE!!
One of the sites I can see why it may have been hit, it has some duplicate content issues I'm working on fixing. But the other, it's all original, hand written descriptions, I just added a load more content to it, I've also been quite careful with backlinks. Maybe I've over optimised or something.
you would think but i got some of my original content sites taken out by the latest algo changes. the google algo isn't perfect.
Fuck, this was my concern as well. I mean if we have original text content that is based upon existing images that expands to the detailed desires of today's sophisticated consumer so that he can understand the referred product, is that considered a content farm?
Fuck, this was my concern as well. I mean if we have original text content that is based upon existing images that expands to the detailed desires of today's sophisticated consumer so that he can understand the referred product, is that considered a content farm?
FTW
the only thing i found out is google webmaster forum is fucking useless.
basically if you have an affiliate link up you deserve a google ban according to the jokers that post there.
what you described could be called a "thin affiliate site" according to their guidelines.
I've got 50 or so sites on LS - 20+ of them are heavily traded there. I just ran my SERP rank checking software and the only movement in serps that I've had is UP. Lots of top 10 rankings for low to medium density KW's.
Yes but you only have to apply a little thought and common sense to see that if everyone stopped linking to anyone else for fear of being seen to be manipulating the search engines, the whole fucking web would fall apart. So you should just link to, and seek links from, sites that you think fit in with what your surfer is looking for, and LS is as good a tool for that as any other.
Comment