GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Is This Attractive? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=858890)

DeanCapture 10-01-2008 03:52 PM

Is This Attractive?
 
Just saw this Genesis Magazine cover and wondered if anyone thinks it's attractive?

Does Briana look like shes about to throw up? Does she look like she's enjoying herself?

http://deancapture.com/pics/genesis_cover.jpg

DarkJedi 10-01-2008 03:57 PM

her tits are fucked

A-n-D-r-E-S 10-01-2008 03:59 PM

She is fine...

dennisthemenace 10-01-2008 04:14 PM

Wow, what happened to her? looks like an impersonator or something

SilentKnight 10-01-2008 04:14 PM

Rather poor choice for a cover shot.

Boobs look askew...belly button looks chopped.

Brutal crop job with her hair.

Deej 10-01-2008 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Davey Jones (Post 14842200)
her tits are fucked

either that or the airbrusher really fucked up the lines...

and no- her face isnt attractive

Supz 10-01-2008 04:15 PM

she does look pretty miserable

TRe$yNFuL 10-01-2008 04:17 PM

Talk about crash and burn...

:disgust

DeanCapture 10-01-2008 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight (Post 14842266)
Rather poor choice for a cover shot.

My thoughts exactly. Not every model looks good in every pose. But for a cover shot, you would think the editor would look for a pose and an expression that actually flatters the model! Sometimes I wonder what editors use for brains :Oh crap

NY Jester 10-01-2008 04:22 PM

The colors are way off. They seem to clash a bit...and Brianna looks as if she's got some leakage going on there.

LexiLexxx 10-01-2008 04:25 PM

Frankly, If I owned the magazine.....that cover would have never made it!

lol

Useless Warrior 10-01-2008 04:28 PM

She appears to have no pelvis.

tony286 10-01-2008 04:40 PM

not a flattering pose.

Bojangles 10-01-2008 04:43 PM

Looks weird.

notoldschool 10-01-2008 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture (Post 14842181)
Just saw this Genesis Magazine cover and wondered if anyone thinks it's attractive?

Does Briana look like shes about to throw up? Does she look like she's enjoying herself?

http://deancapture.com/pics/genesis_cover.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2010/...c61a62.jpg?v=0

aico 10-01-2008 04:47 PM

pure crap, obviously whoever did that doesn't know the first thing about photoshop, much less color correction and printing.

Praguer 10-01-2008 05:37 PM

The worst part of all is the look in her eyes. Maybe the photographer told her to give a sexy look to the camera.

It came up more like she is impatient and angry.

Spunky 10-01-2008 05:45 PM

Not one of her better shots

bluemoney 10-01-2008 05:46 PM

Yeeeeeeeesh!

Mutt 10-01-2008 05:49 PM

Mens magazines are horrible these days - my photog John shoots for most of them - one of them literally has computers running Windows 3.1 - they are all playing out the string,
kinda the way this business will be in a few years for most people.

Check out Gallery magazine this month - the Girl Next Door of the Month is John's - he sent them a DVD with 500 color corrected edited shots and the raw originals - they printed the raw unedited images - bags under the model's eyes, blemishes - he informed them and they really didn't notice or care.

MandyBlake 10-01-2008 05:49 PM

it looks like she's sneering me to.

Iron Fist 10-01-2008 06:01 PM

"Just try it fucker and i'll rip yer balls off... trust me..."

Might not buy the magazine if that's what shes saying in my head.

SEXTANT 10-01-2008 06:08 PM

interesting,but nothing new

Mutt 10-01-2008 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture (Post 14842181)
Just saw this Genesis Magazine cover and wondered if anyone thinks it's attractive?

Does Briana look like shes about to throw up? Does she look like she's enjoying herself?

http://deancapture.com/pics/genesis_cover.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by notoldschool (Post 14842378)


:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

missed that one the first time around

ZeroHero 10-01-2008 06:19 PM

i want see the nipples :(

DeanCapture 10-01-2008 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 14842600)
Mens magazines are horrible these days - my photog John shoots for most of them - one of them literally has computers running Windows 3.1 - they are all playing out the string,
kinda the way this business will be in a few years for most people.

Check out Gallery magazine this month - the Girl Next Door of the Month is John's - he sent them a DVD with 500 color corrected edited shots and the raw originals - they printed the raw unedited images - bags under the model's eyes, blemishes - he informed them and they really didn't notice or care.

That's interesting....

When I saw the cover layout for my first Penthouse Magazine cover, I emailed the powers to be a small note with a couple of very minor adjustments within photoshop that would have really made a difference in the shot and would have made the model more flattering. In my opinion - there were much better shots but since they wanted this one, I thought it would be fine with a couple of minor adjustments.

They agreed that my "corrections" would have made the shot look better and thanked me for the suggestions...giving me the impression that it would be taken care of. When I got my copies, none of the corrections were made and the cover was not as good as it could have been.

In my opinion, you can't expect an editor of a magazine to color correct your images or pick out the best shots. I've spent years learning to color correct for beautiful skin tone and learning to work with models to bring out their beauty by focusing on their good features and not drawing attention to their bad features. An editor (unless he or she has a passion for what they are doing) will never do a good job at any of this. Magazines would do much better if they'd hire a seasoned photographer (with skills) to do the photo editing instead of giving that job to someone who has no idea what the hell they are doing. :2 cents:

Triple10Terry 10-01-2008 07:11 PM

Definitely not her best pic. Pretty disturbing actually

Mr Pheer 10-02-2008 12:50 AM

who gives a fuck... lets see that Jesse Jane pictorial

LeRoy 10-02-2008 01:03 AM

waaahappen :(

gimo33 10-02-2008 01:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico (Post 14842381)
pure crap, obviously whoever did that doesn't know the first thing about photoshop, much less color correction and printing.

:2 cents:

WiredGuy 10-02-2008 01:44 AM

If that's been airbrushed, I'm afraid to ask to see the original photo.
WG

OG LennyT 10-02-2008 01:48 AM

garbage... yep

Shap 10-02-2008 01:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture (Post 14842181)
Just saw this Genesis Magazine cover and wondered if anyone thinks it's attractive?

Does Briana look like shes about to throw up? Does she look like she's enjoying herself?

http://deancapture.com/pics/genesis_cover.jpg

Horrible. Really nasty pic.

bobby666 10-02-2008 02:23 AM

the cover looks so cheap

Nikki-webcams 10-02-2008 03:02 AM

Shit
 
She's not the best model really is she - UGLY and bad shot her legs/tits/face look funny !!

jonesonyou 10-02-2008 03:13 AM

She looks like she'd be hot but the camera angle is bad

DBS.US 10-02-2008 04:58 PM

Ya, not your best work:winkwink:

DWB 10-02-2008 05:01 PM

That's not a flattering shot.

brassmonkey 10-02-2008 05:02 PM

tits are off id do her doggystyle

CaptainHowdy 10-02-2008 07:05 PM

That gives hope to A LOT of porn photographers I guess...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123