GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Visual differences between PS3 and Xbox360 (pics) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=677055)

Jay_StandAhead 11-14-2006 06:30 AM

Visual differences between PS3 and Xbox360 (pics)
 
Ridge Racer 6 (xbox360) VS Ridge Racer 7 (PS3)

http://www.whateverthefuck.com/1ps3.jpg

http://www.whateverthefuck.com/2ps3.jpg

Violetta 11-14-2006 06:31 AM

bandwith exceeded

notabook 11-14-2006 06:32 AM

What the fuck lol, how come it has so many fewer textures?

ForteCash 11-14-2006 06:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notabook (Post 11311230)
What the fuck lol, how come it has so many fewer textures?

Becuase it sux, costs twice as much almost, and they lose 400 bucks on ever console sold. what morons. Plus, i'm sure the hard drive in it will explode since it's a sony :1orglaugh

notabook 11-14-2006 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForteCash (Post 11311244)
Becuase it sux, costs twice as much almost, and they lose 400 bucks on ever console sold. what morons. Plus, i'm sure the hard drive in it will explode since it's a sony :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh Hey dude, as long as they are selling for 1200-1400 on fleabay is all I care about. It's just really strange that it's out a year later than Xbox 360 and it appears to have much fewer rendering capabilities... Jesus christ Sony, how you have fallen.

jimthefiend 11-14-2006 06:38 AM

Well that just made up my mind. Been thinking about getting a console for the kid.

Jay_StandAhead 11-14-2006 06:41 AM

http://www.whateverthefuck.com/3ps3.jpg

e-god 11-14-2006 07:03 AM

probably that problem is with particular games only. lets wait till we can try the ps3 console for real and then discuss

Nathan 11-14-2006 07:10 AM

I might be the only one here...

but I think the PS3 actually looks way more realistic.

The sailboat is also way more difficult to render than the cruiseliner.

The building looks more real, the clouds are way better, the colors in general are way nicer.

notabook 11-14-2006 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nathan (Post 11311396)
I might be the only one here...

but I think the PS3 actually looks way more realistic.

The sailboat is also way more difficult to render than the cruiseliner.

The building looks more real, the clouds are way better, the colors in general are way nicer.

lmao just look at the water. Xbox 360 has realistic looking water. PS3... what water? Looks like concrete. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Nylz 11-14-2006 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jay[neX] (Post 11311268)

Ps3 looks way better here imho

andrej_NDC 11-14-2006 07:38 AM

http://www.allnextdoor.com/ps3vsxbox.jpg

Ohface 11-14-2006 07:43 AM

From what I can see PS3 sux:BangBang:

ImLost 11-14-2006 07:43 AM

i like the 360

StuartD 11-14-2006 07:50 AM

Wow, non existant water, no cruise ship, blurry building, little to no road details...

I hope that's just a case of Ridge Racer having screwed the pooch and not completing a lot of stuff.

evildick 11-14-2006 07:54 AM

The graphics in both those games suck ass. Better to compare something like Gears of War to Resistance:Fall of Man to get a better idea of each console's capabilities. They can both put out very nice graphics. Namco always spits out a couple turds on the launch of any new system.

Better pics

360
http://img.pro-g.co.uk/images/xbox2/..._of_war_10.jpg

PS3
http://www.gamepro.com/screens/110671/46560-3-2.jpg

pornpf69 11-14-2006 08:01 AM

those seem to be some nice games!!

NinjaSteve 11-14-2006 08:01 AM

xbox 360 rulez

StuartD 11-14-2006 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evildick (Post 11311590)
Better to compare something like Gears of War to Resistance:Fall of Man to get a better idea of each console's capabilities.

How the hell is comparing two completely different games supposed to be better than comparing the exact same games at the exact same scenes?

Sosa 11-14-2006 08:11 AM

was that from a final ps3 machine, and final copy of ridge racer?

MaddCaz 11-14-2006 08:13 AM

holy shit what???

DarkJedi 11-14-2006 08:14 AM

how come 360 looks better?

MaddCaz 11-14-2006 08:17 AM

if that's the real deal, then that's amazingly disappointing

evildick 11-14-2006 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StuartD (Post 11311682)
How the hell is comparing two completely different games supposed to be better than comparing the exact same games at the exact same scenes?

Because the game everyone is comparing here is a piece of crap that was rushed to launch for the release of both machines, and has never been a graphical standout on any system, except maybe on the PS1.

Namco is notorious for churning out these Ridge Racer games to make the first day of launch of almost every major console. It's like trying to compare the power of two of the latest graphics card on a PC based on playing minesweeper.

The games I showed prove both systems are capable of similar graphical effects and quality.

Saying one system sucks and the other doesn't based on those Ridge Racer screenshots is just plain silly.

ForteCash 11-14-2006 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrej_NDC (Post 11311533)

I have a 360 and its not noisy at all. If you are saying you would spend twice as much for something a little bit quieter with less capabilities, thats really dumb :1orglaugh

reynold 11-14-2006 08:57 AM

I always go with XBOX 360. :thumbsup

paterson3713 11-14-2006 09:05 AM

PS; I'm selling my Xbox 360 Premium, with 11 games + 3 controllers if anyone is interested. It's hardly been used, so it is in great conditions.

Sosa 11-14-2006 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForteCash (Post 11311931)
I have a 360 and its not noisy at all. If you are saying you would spend twice as much for something a little bit quieter with less capabilities, thats really dumb :1orglaugh

I have had two 360's and both of them are pretty loud when running. You can hear the fans etc spinning pretty fast. I guess you wouldn't hear it if you got porn on in the background :)

Jay_StandAhead 11-14-2006 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by paterson3713 (Post 11312007)
PS; I'm selling my Xbox 360 Premium, with 11 games + 3 controllers if anyone is interested. It's hardly been used, so it is in great conditions.

ICQ me: 8763744

ForteCash 11-14-2006 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sosa (Post 11312149)
I have had two 360's and both of them are pretty loud when running. You can hear the fans etc spinning pretty fast. I guess you wouldn't hear it if you got porn on in the background :)

yeah, I guess i never noticed =) turned it on and it is kinda loud, but not loud enough to spend 600 on a PS3 :error

Jakke PNG 11-14-2006 09:40 AM

I'd have to see the picture moving to make a decision. Still frames don't do justice. Kick-ass looking but choppy is worse than slightly less impressive looking and kicking out those FPS's.

dunefield 11-14-2006 09:46 AM

Well considering development hasn't been going too long for the PS3 compared to the XBOX360 some games are going to look shoddy first off... Compare games in another year and you'll see a drastic improvement...

Sosa 11-14-2006 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForteCash (Post 11312213)
yeah, I guess i never noticed =) turned it on and it is kinda loud, but not loud enough to spend 600 on a PS3 :error

Most people spending $600 on a PS3 are die hard gamers or have $600 for a video game system so it doesn't matter. I will eventually pick one up, along with a Nintendo Wii.

I woulda talk about the price too much considering you get a Blue Ray player with the PS3 and 60 gig HD, compared to a 360 with 20 gig HD for $400, or you can purchase a $200 HD-DVD player for the 360 that brings its total to $600 also.

I will have all three systems, so I won't talk shit about any of em :)

Slick 11-14-2006 10:04 AM

I agree with the others about the game. Perhaps someone should check out a Call Of Duty 3 comparison and see.

I guess that one advantage that the Xbox360 has is that the developers have had an extra year to work with the devoping of the games to know how to develop for it whereas the PS3 is all new to them.

I myself have 2 Xbox360s in my house and with the scarcity of the PS3, I was forced to hit up Ebay a couple of weeks ago to buy a PS3, so I'll give you my review on it once it gets here :)

Nathan 11-14-2006 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notabook (Post 11311404)
lmao just look at the water. Xbox 360 has realistic looking water. PS3... what water? Looks like concrete. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

It isn't all that funny.. you base all this on the water?

What about the strange fact that in the XBOX version there is _NO_ sailboat but there is one in the ps3?

What about the fact that the trees visible under/left of the bridge are much more detailed and that there are more of them in the PS3 than in the XBOX?

Its obvious that the two are based on different versions of the same game. How can you even begin to compare those?!

Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE 11-14-2006 10:18 AM

welp, looks like i made a good decision last christmas to ditch my ps and get an xbox, will keep doing that by getting a 360 over a ps3

evildick 11-14-2006 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slick (Post 11312370)
I agree with the others about the game. Perhaps someone should check out a Call Of Duty 3 comparison and see.

This would be a good game to compare. The rumour I heard was that while the 360 version was running smooth at 60 FPS, the PS3 version was going to be released at 30 FPS. If that turns out to be the case then it could very well be that the PS3 is a lot harder to program for, at least when they are trying to do ports of these multiplatform games.

_Richard_ 11-14-2006 10:19 AM

wow.. i can't believe that. I was thinking the same thing with the game creator crapping out on the graphics for ps3, but the gears of war game looks SO much better than Resistance:Fall of Man. Like generations different. I also really looking forward to assassins creed

R

Ace_luffy 11-14-2006 10:21 AM

it seems ps3 is more better.. . . ..

pornguy 11-14-2006 10:21 AM

I have the OLD xbox, and I am happy as hell with it. I can not see wasting that kind of money on a game.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123