![]() |
NATS + Carma or MPA3 + MAS? I'm Going With One This Month. Which CEO is hotter?
I'm 'bout to make my final decision. I'm going with one this month:
NATS and Carma or MPA3 and MAS Which one did you / would you choose and why? Also, who is hotter: John Albright from NATS or Garry Oien from Mansion. Yes, this will play a part in my decision. |
I voted already
|
I'd go with mpa3 and mas, for no specific reason I wish the public to know. :)
|
None of the above, if your looking to grow your program large go with Rob from clickmans custom solution. His stuff it top notch and he has been around longer than any of the other systems around
|
NATS and Carma
|
Quote:
|
none of the above
|
We use Nats and Carma, all works well.
|
Quote:
|
I'm wondering why "hotness" has anything to do with what system you choose?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
NATS :thumbsup
|
NATS is my choice
|
Quote:
I would love to see how you make money in this biz with a sales pitch like that. |
Both companies have thier problems. After trying to make this same decision I went with MPA3.
|
Quote:
Im not selling anyones software, since we use his software i put it into the mix as an alternative, Nothing more. |
Sinister: Just for shits and giggles you got a link?
|
Bump for the link from Sinister.
|
nats12345
|
I have been really happy with MPA3 and MAS. The products work well and the support is excellent. The MAS 2257 module has made my life much easier too...
--Glenn |
I stand behind nats... good product imo
|
As a affiliate:
NATS + Carma Easy and fast to use. You have all the functions you need. Many webmasters preffere NATS because they know and trust the script. As a Program owner: MPA3 + MAS The admin is the best in the industry. Best functions and setup. |
Quote:
We use two totally different systems now, which means we have to basically enter in everything twice so content url tracking is done on the 2257 management side too. It's an asspain...... |
You obviously didn't like the move John just did.
Let me tell you one thing about mpa3 : They had a shave feature in version 2. They got bashed and lost their business because of that. They NEVER apologized to webmasters, and always told us how they were just adapting to the market needs and this and that. What is worse : John exposing very possible shavers, or mpa allowing shaving ? you should contact pipecrew, he knows of a better solution I think |
Quote:
Either 1: make sure you've good and talked to them before you made the post and you know 100% what's going on. Or 2: If they refuse to talk put some more finality in your announcement. Have to see how things play out, I don't personally know any of the parties involved. |
MPA - pure class over there.
|
Quote:
http://www.clickman.com/index2.html |
Nats + Carma
|
Quote:
|
For some reason I convert more on Nats then MPA3, and I mean waaaaaay more. So I vote Nats + Carma.
|
Please go with MPA3, so I know how it goes, cuz I am going with one soon myself.
|
Quote:
|
NATS gets my vote
Regarding CARMA I think a custom CMS is always better than an out of the box solution. Will cost you the same |
Quote:
That said: http://www.avnonline.com/index.php?P...tent_ID=244967 And: http://www.avnonline.com/index.php?P...tent_ID=263846 :2 cents: |
Bump for MPA3
|
Quote:
I have no investement in NATS. |
It's always interesting how even these type of polls are between TMM and Mansion. And from the press photos, management in both companies are handsome.
We use NATS and Carma together and really like the software. There is a learning curve in getting the program set up and implementing all of the features, but once you have a good grasp on the process it's smooth. And overall, doing business with TMM is great and support is fast. I hear many great things about Mansion, including great software and support. No practical experience in using them though. One of the main reasons is in just about every thread for Mansion some drops the past shaving comments. Does that hurt overall business and keep affiliates from not wanting to sell the product? I can't be sure... but I wouldn't like having one more thing to worry about. Some of the bigger programs use custom solutions since NATS / MPA3 did not exist when the programs were created. It would be a HUGE undertaking to change over all of the software for possibly little to no benefit. ... and if it ain't broke, why fix it? Any program looking to change over does so on idea it will increase business, through more efficient management and increased sales/reputation and the cleanliness of a integrated solution. A few programs have such muddled custom Frankenstein backends that have been modified by multiple programmers that even they don't know what end is up. Talk about specific details on what you need the software to accomplish with your program.... that would help in advice on a decision. These threads end up being popularity contests. And most importantly you should contact your affiliates directly to see their opinions on changing to a new affiliate management platform. Are you planning on keeping the CCbill program running as well? |
Just have to say that we use MPA and their support is out of this world! Any problems that I've had or modifications I've needed, to fit my program they jump on top of the issue right away!
|
I hope you do well who ever you pic.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123