![]() |
Lensman I smell some FSC bullshitting
Lensman why did you edit this post?
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=483903 Originally your post said that they agree not to inspect anyone until the next hearing, then you changed it to just say FSC members. I just find it very interesting how the post was edited. Why doesn't the FSC post the actual documents. It was originally stated that there was a 2257 injunction overall, not just for plaintiffs and FSC members. No disrespect. I just don't get why your statement was changed, was it mis-stated or did I read it wrong? |
Front row....
|
i always thought it was obivous why sponsors were pushing FSC so hard, but that's just me
|
I believe the court documents have been released already!
|
Damn i was about to go to bed :Oh crap
|
some very devious actions are in the making
|
I am a member just in case and I recommend you all do it.
|
Quote:
|
Now if the FSC would hurry up and process my fax join, I'd be able to sleep.
|
Quote:
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=484947 |
|
I thought he edited it because he was spilling the beans before the judge approved it.
A big no-no. |
Quote:
|
Government agrees: (1) not to conduct any inspections, with regard to the Plaintiffs and their members, under 18 U.S.C. section 2257 and the Attorney General?s new implementing regulations; and (2) not to pursue any claim against Plaintiffs and their members under 18 U.S.C. section 2257 and the Attorney General?s new implementing regulations.
not to pursue any claim against Plaintiffs and their members under 18 U.S.C. section 2257 = MEMBERS |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:1orglaugh Actually, I did miss what the post originally said - I only saw the recent version. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
so with that being said being a part of the coalition could only make you temporarily exempt if that's granted and i haven't read up to see if it was or has been. but if the case fails you'll be in the same shit as everyone else and quite possibly get yourself exposed more, but all of that takes time. and bla bla bla bla bla like i said i don't know what i'm talking about and it's not legal advice. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Which makes me think about something else now lol. What if a sponsor gives out the proper docs to the afillates and down the road the doj finds out the sponsor shot a minor or something. Will the afillates be held responsable and asguilty as the sponsor ? real scary think about it :Oh crap |
Quote:
Six to be exact, 6 whose populations combined equals LA maybe (going by memory I think it is Wy, UT, CO, NM, KS and OK). Not too many webmasters there I don't think. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
wait wait wait.... lol So you are saying the injunction only covers people und the District 10 Court area? |
Guess I shouldn't be heading to bed
|
Quote:
Nope this should prove to be interesting. I will be on the phone tommorw. I wish the FSC would get someone over here to anwser question |
Quote:
Thats alot of trust to be puting in a sponsor.......... |
Quote:
Document 1: HEARING ON TERMS OF STIPULATION Document 2: STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER ALSO Here is Exhibit A that the DOJ is using against the FSC. You know.. the FSC attorney making statements on the site that the FSC doesn't endorse relying on Sundance for protection.. something of that nature. |
Quote:
If there was an injunction, only courts are required to honor it, although usually all will. Thing is, I don't think they went for the injunction yet, they just stipulated to the conditions you have already read. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
ah ok..... |
Quote:
so sure the govt is fucking us on this one, we all know that. i for one would be very happy to see all of the sponsors providing good quality softcore content anyway and always have wanted that. |
Quote:
This shit will make your head spin....... |
Quote:
Oh yeah, huge victory. Power to the people. </sarcasm> |
Well the docs, which I overlooked before are saying "members" only.
so that's insightful.. just wondering about districts now. |
Quote:
Well, after reading the stipulation, it says the DOJ won't hold inspections on members, it doesn't say it won't conduct inspections on members in the 10th District, so I am sure it applies to all. |
Total time in court 24 minutes.... Glad to see it was a long draged out fight....
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123