GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Mark Furhman is DUMBER THAN A hahahahahaha!!!!!! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=455561)

blackmonsters 04-13-2005 02:44 PM

Mark Furhman is DUMBER THAN A hahahahahaha!!!!!!
 
The judge in the Michael Jackson case just allowed the accusers mom to plead the 5th to any questions related to her illegal welfare payments, but she can testify about anything else she wants.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=stor...n&sid=84439559


This means that Mark Furhman could have pled the 5th to all questions about
using the word hahahahahaha and still testified against OJ.
He would never have convicted of perjury and he could still own a hand gun, still be a cop and still have his right to vote.
The prosecution told Furhman that they would go into that area. In fact F. Lee Bailey could have never asked the question(durring cross examination, that is) if the prosecution had not opened that area of questioning. So he knew it was comming.

I guess he's dumber than anybody he ever called a hahahahahaha. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

ADL_JD 04-13-2005 02:46 PM

Mark Furhman probably made out much better (at least financially) by doing what he did. He has sold books, appears on all these talk shows (still)... etc. And I am sure that Furhman was well represented. If his attorney wanted him to plead the 5th he would have.

****

blackmonsters 04-13-2005 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ADL_JD
Mark Furhman probably made out much better (at least financially) by doing what he did. He has sold books, appears on all these talk shows (still)... etc. And I am sure that Furhman was well represented. If his attorney wanted him to plead the 5th he would have.

****

He did plead the 5th!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
When the defense had it's turn to call witnesses Furhman took the 5th because the defense was going to ask him about a cassette tape where he used the n word 57 times and prove in front of the jury that he lied on the stand about using the word.

Where the hell were you?

Oh that's right, you were probably 10 yrs old then.

spunkmaster 04-13-2005 02:57 PM

Furhman wasn't charged with anything?

Infact, the black police chief of the LAPD did an investigation and he
was cleared of any abuse or wrong doing against blacks !

blackmonsters 04-13-2005 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spunkmaster
Furhman wasn't charged with anything?

Infact, the black police chief of the LAPD did an investigation and he
was cleared of any abuse or wrong doing against blacks !

:1orglaugh

Please google up the info so I don't have to post a link to show you how wrong you are. Furhman pleaded "no contest" to a felony count of perjury for his testimony in the OJ simpson trail. He was sentenced to probation.

baddog 04-13-2005 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters
:1orglaugh

Please google up the info so I don't have to post a link to show you how wrong you are. Furhman pleaded "no contest" to a felony count of perjury for his testimony in the OJ simpson trail. He was sentenced to probation.

Do you know what "no contest" means?

Rich 04-13-2005 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
Do you know what "no contest" means?

Do you think it means that he wasn't charged with anything?

blackmonsters 04-13-2005 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
Do you know what "no contest" means?

Yes I do.

It means you do not admit guilt but you accept the conviction for the crime you were charged with and you will be sentenced without going to trial.

In other words, you're fucking guilty, you fucking know it, you fucking can't get out of it, but you're too fucking lame to just face the truth.

Don't ever go into court and plead no contest unless you absolutley cannot beat the charge or you get a plea bargin deal.

If there is any chance what-so-ever that you can beat the charge and you have no plea bargin deal then the only plea to make is "not guilty".

blackmonsters 04-13-2005 05:04 PM

Man, this thread is really showing me why people need lawyers.

Nobody in this thread should ever represent themselves in court, I mean you don't even understand what your plea options are or what they even mean.

escorpio 04-13-2005 05:04 PM

O.J. is a bigger piece of shit than Mark Fuhrman is.

mahoney 04-13-2005 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by escorpio
O.J. is a bigger piece of shit than Mark Fuhrman is.


LOL How Dare You..Oj is still looking for the Real Killer :1orglaugh

blackmonsters 04-13-2005 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by escorpio
O.J. is a bigger piece of shit than Mark Fuhrman is.

How does OJ being a bigger piece of shit make Furhman's choices on the wittness stand any smarter?

That is what I'm talking about...(pleading the 5th to "avoid" a conviction)

Avoiding the conviction in the only thing the 5th is about(the right to not self-incriminate), but Furhman pleaded the 5th and still was convicted.

Musical tune: dum da dum dum dummmmmmmmmmb! :1orglaugh

blackmonsters 04-13-2005 05:41 PM

Holy SHIZZZZZZZZNITTTTTT!

Furhman resinged from the LAPD before the trial began.

One good reason to do that is, in California, an active police officer acting as a wittness can not take the 5th in a criminal trial!!!!!!!

Did he anticipate taking the 5th and still fucked up??????

wargames 04-13-2005 06:25 PM

:1orglaugh

escorpio 04-13-2005 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters
How does OJ being a bigger piece of shit make Furhman's choices on the wittness stand any smarter?

It doesn't, I just enjoy stating the obvious about O.J. :)

As for Fuhrman's choices on the witness stand perhaps he received bad legal advice. People that hire bad attorneys aren't necessarily stupid. Just like people that hire good attorneys aren't always innocent.


btw - you can't even SPELL witness. I bet Mark Fuhrman can.

blackmonsters 04-13-2005 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by escorpio
btw - you can't even SPELL witness. I bet Mark Fuhrman can.

I bet he can spell "felony conviction" too. :1orglaugh

Harmon 04-13-2005 07:51 PM

Who really cares? Mark Fuhrman is a white elitist racist cocksucker, OJ is fucking guilty, and Mike J. is a fucking pedo. What's your fucking point? You should have just titled this thread, "THE NAMES OF THREE FUCKING MORONS INSIDE [PICS]" - we would have received more from it :thumbsup

cambaby 04-13-2005 07:51 PM

Beta Test This automated perl script(compare to Cumus Thumbs)

Hey I compared your script to Comus thumbs and your script sucked, whats this CUMUS thumbs?

blackmonsters 04-13-2005 07:53 PM

[QUOTE=escorpio]perhaps he received bad legal advice.QUOTE]

Perhaps he should've been smart enough to hire one of dem niggas that OJ had. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

pxxx 04-13-2005 07:59 PM

I think that they need to leave him alone.

baddog 04-13-2005 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters
Yes I do.

It means you do not admit guilt but you accept the conviction for the crime you were charged with and you will be sentenced without going to trial.

In other words, you're fucking guilty, you fucking know it, you fucking can't get out of it, but you're too fucking lame to just face the truth.

Don't ever go into court and plead no contest unless you absolutley cannot beat the charge or you get a plea bargin deal.

If there is any chance what-so-ever that you can beat the charge and you have no plea bargin deal then the only plea to make is "not guilty".


You are black, aren't you? I thought you would have better knowledge of the law.

You obviously have no clue what "no contest" is about.

baddog 04-13-2005 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters
Man, this thread is really showing me why people need lawyers.

Nobody in this thread should ever represent themselves in court, I mean you don't even understand what your plea options are or what they even mean.


Moron, what are you talking about? You have already displayed your total misunderstanding of the law.

blackmonsters 04-13-2005 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cambaby
Beta Test This automated perl script(compare to Cumus Thumbs)

Hey I compared your script to Comus thumbs and your script sucked, whats this CUMUS thumbs?

Well, I guess I will correct that in my sig.

I never used comus thumbs so it may be true that compared to comus thumbs my script sucks....but then again my beta script is $295 less than comus.


BTW: What features did comus have that you think were better than getthumbs? I don't know if comus can retrieve and process thumbs for 1000's of hosted galleries while you sleep but getthumbs can.

Harmon 04-13-2005 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters
Well, I guess I will correct that in my sig.

I never used comus thumbs so it may be true that compared to comus thumbs my script sucks....but then again my beta script is $295 less than comus.


BTW: What features did comus have that you think were better than getthumbs? I don't know if comus can retrieve and process thumbs for 1000's of hosted galleries while you sleep but getthumbs can.

So you claim to TEST your script against a script you have never fucked with and you use this as a hook? Good tactics :1orglaugh

cambaby 04-13-2005 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters
Well, I guess I will correct that in my sig.

I never used comus thumbs so it may be true that compared to comus thumbs my script sucks....but then again my beta script is $295 less than comus.


BTW: What features did comus have that you think were better than getthumbs? I don't know if comus can retrieve and process thumbs for 1000's of hosted galleries while you sleep but getthumbs can.

Comus has extreme features you arent even touching. Like uber-cool server hacking. No seriously you need to try it before you make a claim like you got in your sig it kinda puts your script to shame.

Also last time I checked people who work for a living usually are awake while they are working? Call me crazy... :1orglaugh

blackmonsters 04-13-2005 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
You obviously have no clue what "no contest" is about.

Please educate me on the meaning of "no contest".

You say I don't know what it means but you never bother to say what it means.

Harmon 04-13-2005 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters
Please educate me on the meaning of "no contest".

You say I don't know what it means but you never bother to say what it means.

AND I QUOTE:

"no contest definition ? in a criminal lawsuit, no contest is where a defendant neither admits not denies a crime but accepts punishment as though he or she were guilty."

http://www.legal-definitions.com/no-contest.htm

blackmonsters 04-13-2005 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harmon
AND I QUOTE:

"no contest definition ? in a criminal lawsuit, no contest is where a defendant neither admits not denies a crime but accepts punishment as though he or she were guilty."

http://www.legal-definitions.com/no-contest.htm

Ahhhhhh!!! Mannnnnnn!!!!!!

Why didn't you let the dumb motherfucker post some stupid shit first!
You, you, you,.....EDUCATED ASSHOLE!!!!!! :1orglaugh

baddog 04-13-2005 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters
Please educate me on the meaning of "no contest".

You say I don't know what it means but you never bother to say what it means.


When you and your gangster friends think you are avoiding something or being somehow helping your situation are sadly mistaken.

When you plead nolo contendre in a criminal case you are not saying you are guilty or not, and you will accept your punishment. The court sees it as a guilty.

The only time no contest helps you is if there is a pending civil case, where your conviction might be used as evidence against you in that trial. Nolo contendre means they can not use your plea as evidence against you in the civil case.

For example: I beat you up, and blow up your car. I get arrested for battery and using explosives within city limits.

You are planning on suing me as soon as you get out of the hospital.

If I go to trial on the criminal case and lose, you can use that as evidence against me in your civil trial. If I plead guilty, same thing happens.

If I plead nolo contendre my criminal case does not even come into evidence.

baddog 04-13-2005 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harmon
AND I QUOTE:

"no contest definition ? in a criminal lawsuit, no contest is where a defendant neither admits not denies a crime but accepts punishment as though he or she were guilty."

http://www.legal-definitions.com/no-contest.htm


Maybe you should read my post. Knowing what it means and what it means in practice are two entirely different things.

escorpio 04-13-2005 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters
I bet he can spell "felony conviction" too.

Isn't that what Negroes call "keepin' it real"?

baddog 04-13-2005 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters
Ahhhhhh!!! Mannnnnnn!!!!!!

Why didn't you let the dumb motherfucker post some stupid shit first!
You, you, you,.....EDUCATED ASSHOLE!!!!!! :1orglaugh


yeah, he must be a Rhodes Scholar to figure out how to Google "no contest"

dumbass

cambaby 04-13-2005 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
For example: I beat you up, and blow up your car. I get arrested for battery and using explosives within city limits.

You are planning on suing me as soon as you get out of the hospital.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

baddog 04-13-2005 08:47 PM

BTW, to our legal genius: You said he should have invoked the 5th to prevent incriminating himself. I have a question, incriminate himself of what?

blackmonsters 04-13-2005 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cambaby
Comus has extreme features you arent even touching. Like uber-cool server hacking. No seriously you need to try it before you make a claim like you got in your sig it kinda puts your script to shame.

I don't make any claims...I said "compare" the two.

Most people are not going to buy two scripts just to compare them together so "compare" logically means looking at the features and seeing which one has the features you want to use.

Comus may have plenty of features that I don't care about.
Getthumbs is mostly concerned with helping webmasters who use a lot of hosted galleries get thumbnails automatically without ever having to actually visit each gallery in a browser. It's not concerned with gallery submission or reviewing galleries and things like that. Getthumbs ranks thumbs by surfer clicks and this is something that comus does.


I say the webmaster that has neither script should compare the two because the reality here is that I wanted to buy comus thumbs but when I saw the price and what it did I realized it cost too much for what I wanted to do.
I could write my own program to do only what I was seeking. It works great for me so I decided to develop it more so that others can use it.


What I really think is going on here is that you paid out the ass for comus and pay out the ass again for each new domain and then here I come with a script that just might have done what you needed to make money and I'm giving a test version away for free. I think you may be angry that it's now be hard to justify spending so much money.


Further: What part about BETA don't you understand???
Beta means I am still developing the script and I don't consider it ready to sell. Comus is already thru BETA and being sold.
BETA testers, in appreciation of free sofware, will hopefully make suggestions to improve the script. BETA testers that simply chime in with "your script sucks" are basically assholes who do not want to be testers, they just want what ever they can get for free, and they want it to work perfectly right now as if they paid out the ass like you did.

cambaby 04-13-2005 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters
What I really think is going on here is that you paid out the ass for comus and pay out the ass again for each new domain and then here I come with a script that just might have done what you needed to make money and I'm giving a test version away for free. I think you may be angry that it's now be hard to justify spending so much money.

Nope never purchased Comus, I tried the free skim version back when TGPs were all the rage. If you cant afford $300 in this business... you are in the wrong business. Hey Im glad its in PERL I can see the source code and can hack it up nicely to do what I want... that is IF I ran a TGP lol. :1orglaugh


Oh and PS FIX YOUR SIG :)

jonesy 04-13-2005 09:27 PM

http://www.criminology.fsu.edu/crimemedia/FUHRMAN2.JPG

MrJackMeHoff 04-13-2005 09:29 PM

NIGGER???

No before you ask Im not racist. I hate everyone equaly.

blackmonsters 04-13-2005 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by escorpio
Isn't that what Negroes call "keepin' it real"?

I don't know what the fuck a negroe says because first all it's spelled "negro".
(click here:http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search) Second I ain't neither one of them.
But I have noticed that when someone doesn't agree with you, you assume they must be of another race.

Hmmmmm...... interesting.

blackmonsters 04-13-2005 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
yeah, he must be a Rhodes Scholar to figure out how to Google "no contest"

dumbass

He figured it out before you did!

Look at the time of your posted explanation and his; just incase you can't get the visual effect of your post being further down the thread. :1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123