GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   North Korea admits it has nuclear weapons! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=429601)

Joe Citizen 02-10-2005 12:38 AM

North Korea admits it has nuclear weapons!
 
BREAKING NEWS

North Korea says it will not participate in six-party nuclear talks and claims for first time it has nuclear weapons. Details soon.

www.cnn.com

Wonder how Bush is going to handle this one?

:1orglaugh

AdultMovies.bz 02-10-2005 12:53 AM

I dont think he gives a shit, there's nowhere near as much oil in North Korea as there is in the middle east :)

A to the J 02-10-2005 01:21 AM

it won't get handled, he wants the oil

Jinx 02-10-2005 01:27 AM

http://photoalbum.co.za/album/data/media/2/1.jpg

Rui 02-10-2005 03:12 AM

He will forget about it and move to another oil-country, and forget yet another bitchslap from Kimmy lol...

ADL Colin 02-10-2005 03:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Citizen
Wonder how Bush is going to handle this one?

How will any of the other five nations that were commited to a nuclear-free North Korea handle it?

How will China handle it? Surrounded by nuclear powers; Russia to the North, India and Pakistan to the west and North Korea - if they can be trusted, to the east.

Joe Citizen 02-10-2005 03:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin
How will any of the other five nations that were commited to a nuclear-free North Korea handle it?

How will China handle it? Surrounded by nuclear powers; Russia to the North, India and Pakistan to the west and North Korea - if they can be trusted, to the east.

More nuclear weapons = more diplomacy.

If you outlaw weapons of mass destruction only outlaws will have weapons of mass destruction.

ahaha

ADL Colin 02-10-2005 03:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Citizen
More nuclear weapons = more diplomacy.

If you outlaw weapons of mass destruction only outlaws will have weapons of mass destruction.

ahaha

Funny. I'm asking these questions to see where you are coming from ...

So do you disagree with the United Nations, the world community and the IAEA? Do you think the United Nations/IAEA should attempt to enforce its agreements? Why do you ask what Bush will do when it is agreements with the international community that are being violated? Do you think the international community is powerless and lacks the will to enforce them? Do you think it would be better to disband those organizations as ineffective?

blazin 02-10-2005 03:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A to the J
it won't get handled, he wants the oil

I can't see it happening either. His sights are set on Iran.

Nicky 02-10-2005 03:54 AM

Oh man, what a long shot, who could have known North Korea had nukes?? :1orglaugh

Joe Citizen 02-10-2005 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin
Do you think the international community is powerless and lacks the will to enforce them?

Why can't countries withdraw from international agreements? Why is it okay for the USA to have weapons of mass destruction for the purposes of defence but not other nations?

I see these nuclear non-proliferation agreements as one sided agreements that only serve the interests of the west. I don't blame them from withdrawing. The USA has shown itself to be a bloodthirsty aggressor and I understand their defesive posturing. Nations are sovereign entities. Why shouldn't they be entitled to utilize nuclear power or develop nuclear weapons as a deterrant to being attacked?

ADL Colin 02-10-2005 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Citizen
Why can't countries withdraw from international agreements? Why is it okay for the USA to have weapons of mass destruction for the purposes of defence but not other nations?

I see these nuclear non-proliferation agreements as one sided agreements that only serve the interests of the west. I don't blame them from withdrawing. The USA has shown itself to be a bloodthirsty aggressor and I understand their defesive posturing. Nations are sovereign entities. Why shouldn't they be entitled to utilize nuclear power or develop nuclear weapons as a deterrant to being attacked?

I've never seen you use such an argument to defend the US, only to criticize it. You could very well use such a belief to defend US policy. Why in all the years of reading your posts have I not seen such a thing? If the US is a sovereign nation does it have a right to torture its political prisoners held on its own soil? Do you have any problem whatsoever with its refusal to not ratify the Kyoto protocol?

You criticize US policy on damned near everything. With a few years as evidence I don't think you've ever said "The US is a sovereign country. It can do what it wants". Let's see. Drug laws and enforcement, education, law-making, politics? When have you used this argument to defend the US?

Joe Citizen 02-10-2005 04:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin
With a few years as evidence I don't think you've ever said "The US is a sovereign country. It can do what it wants".

Where did I say that any sovereign nation can do what it wants? Please don't put words into my mouth.

I'm saying that I don't think that it's unreasonable for a country to develop nuclear power as an alternative power source or nuclear weapons as a deterrant to attack. Especially when countries like Israel and the USA are entitled to have them. And Iran and North Korea are certainly under threat from attack by the USA. I understand their position. They want some leverage and I hope they get it.

theking 02-10-2005 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin
I've never seen you use such an argument to defend the US, only to criticize it. You could very well use such a belief to defend US policy. Why in all the years of reading your posts have I not seen such a thing? If the US is a sovereign nation does it have a right to torture its political prisoners held on its own soil? Do you have any problem whatsoever with its refusal to not ratify the Kyoto protocol?

You criticize US policy on damned near everything. With a few years as evidence I don't think you've ever said "The US is a sovereign country. It can do what it wants". Let's see. Drug laws and enforcement, education, law-making, politics? When have you used this argument to defend the US?

His American wife committed suicide because of him. He has deeply rooted pychological issues.

ADL Colin 02-10-2005 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Citizen
I'm saying that I don't think that it's unreasonable for a country to develop nuclear power as an alternative power source or nuclear weapons as a deterrant to attack. Especially when countries like Israel and the USA are entitled to have them. And Iran and North Korea are certainly under threat from attack by the USA. I understand their position. They want some leverage and I hope they get it.

I think it is unreasonable, Joe. I am opposed to all nuclear weapons myself. I don't think the US should have them either. I don't see where the strategy of letting all nations have them in the supposed interest of "self-defense" is a step in the right direction. It's a MAD world. I think "mutual assured destruction" will only lead to "mutual assured destruction".

ADL Colin 02-10-2005 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking
His American wife committed suicide because of him. He has deeply rooted pychological issues.

?????????

Joe Citizen 02-10-2005 04:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Almighty Colin
I think it is unreasonable, Joe. I am opposed to all nuclear weapons myself. I don't think the US should have them either.

In theory, I agree with you. I think the world would be a better place without nuclear weapons too but I don't think it's ever going to happen.

The cat's been out of the bag a little too long now, don't you think?

evanmorgan 02-10-2005 05:06 AM

Wankstains answer this

If bush went to iraq for the massive supply of oil, why has the price of oil gone up? and why is the USA having to seriously consider using its own oil.....

doesnt make sense to me?
Evn

NoComments 02-10-2005 05:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Citizen
BREAKING NEWS

North Korea says it will not participate in six-party nuclear talks and claims for first time it has nuclear weapons. Details soon.

www.cnn.com

Wonder how Bush is going to handle this one?

:1orglaugh


I have nuclear weapons too.

http://cotac.com/serge/

Odin88 02-10-2005 05:24 AM

Glad to see Stalin's spirit is still living on hey Joe? You must be pretty proud of your communist friends in North Korea.

AdultMovies.bz 02-10-2005 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evanmorgan
Wankstains answer this

If bush went to iraq for the massive supply of oil, why has the price of oil gone up? and why is the USA having to seriously consider using its own oil.....

doesnt make sense to me?
Evn

Why in hell would he steal oil for the profit of his country if he can just jack the price up and control oil deposits for decades to come?

spacemonk 02-10-2005 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultMovies.bz
Why in hell would he steal oil for the profit of his country if he can just jack the price up and control oil deposits for decades to come?

Some people just dont get it

nojob 02-10-2005 08:55 AM

we all knew that they had them, they just wouldn't admit it . If they are going to use them, they will.. We can not stop them.

QuaWee 02-10-2005 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultMovies.bz
I dont think he gives a shit, there's nowhere near as much oil in North Korea as there is in the middle east :)

so so true

serguei 02-10-2005 09:01 AM

I think this is true... Why not....

BRISK 02-10-2005 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evanmorgan
Wankstains answer this

If bush went to iraq for the massive supply of oil, why has the price of oil gone up? and why is the USA having to seriously consider using its own oil.....

doesnt make sense to me?
Evn

You don't just go there and "get oil"

Oil doesn't just fall out of the ground

12clicks 02-10-2005 09:09 AM

N Korea can't reach the US with nukes. The US will use diplomacy to economically subjugate N Korea long before they CAN reach the US.
If the world doesn't go along with it, it really won't matter. Korea is a time bomb that will blow before they can reach the US with a warhead. If the other 5 countries can't defuse the bomb, so be it, they'll learn a good lesson.

12clicks 02-10-2005 09:12 AM

oh, and its amusing to see how the uneducated among us thing that war for oil is a bad thing.
try living without if for a month. you'll be dead, geek. :1orglaugh

ColBigBalls 02-10-2005 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Citizen
BREAKING NEWS

North Korea says it will not participate in six-party nuclear talks and claims for first time it has nuclear weapons. Details soon.

www.cnn.com

Wonder how Bush is going to handle this one?

:1orglaugh

you mean he would attack someone who can fight back..? :warning

e-god 02-10-2005 09:16 AM

http://www.pornrama.net/gfy/AtomicBlast_3.jpg

ColBigBalls 02-10-2005 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks
oh, and its amusing to see how the uneducated among us thing that war for oil is a bad thing.
try living without if for a month. you'll be dead, geek. :1orglaugh

there are many other forms of energy

Mojiteaux 02-10-2005 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColBigBalls
you mean he would attack someone who can fight back..? :warning

I think the US soldiers in Iraq have expererienced very well that even the poorly equipped resistance can fight back hard.

ColBigBalls 02-10-2005 09:41 AM

you know what i ment.

The Sultan Of Smut 02-10-2005 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evanmorgan
Wankstains answer this

If bush went to iraq for the massive supply of oil, why has the price of oil gone up? and why is the USA having to seriously consider using its own oil.....

Because Iraq's oil has been taken off the market. Attacking the country had something to do with that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks
If the other 5 countries can't defuse the bomb, so be it, they'll learn a good lesson.

Absolutely true. The only problem I have is Bush's arguement that Iraq was a "grave and growin threat" when it wasn't and that the DPRK is.

Manowar 02-10-2005 09:44 AM

Prince Charles to marry Camilla Parker Bowles ?

groark 02-10-2005 09:45 AM

I think that NC is now the first real enemy of the USA.. Bush is wetting his pants because he is scared to death

Fun is starting!

milambur 02-10-2005 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks
N Korea can't reach the US with nukes. The US will use diplomacy to economically subjugate N Korea long before they CAN reach the US.
If the world doesn't go along with it, it really won't matter. Korea is a time bomb that will blow before they can reach the US with a warhead. If the other 5 countries can't defuse the bomb, so be it, they'll learn a good lesson.

Yes they can reach the US with nukes, the missile they fired over Japan a couple of years ago could hit Alaska and Hawaii with a nuke and it's widely considered among security experts that they have developed a missile that can strike the US west coast.

Rich 02-10-2005 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milambur
Yes they can reach the US with nukes, the missile they fired over Japan a couple of years ago could hit Alaska and Hawaii with a nuke and it's widely considered among security experts that they have developed a missile that can strike the US west coast.

shh, just let 12dicks talk tough and remain ignorant. He wouldn't be funny if he knew anything.

12clicks 02-10-2005 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColBigBalls
there are many other forms of energy

sure there are kid, just nothing that can run the whole country.

12clicks 02-10-2005 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich
shh, just let 12dicks talk tough and remain ignorant. He wouldn't be funny if he knew anything.

oh look, the idiot came out to play. :1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123