UK Riots Again?..
 

They just ruled that the killing of Duggan - The guy that sparked the last riots was legal - Lets hope it's too cold for all the fucking idiots to go out on a rampage again...

Darks shitting in foreign country again?

The cunt had a gun. Police took him down before he took someone else down.

Fuck him! And fuck anyone that tries to use it as an excuse to go on the rampage again...

police make shit up all the time. http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2...h-london-riots would be funny as hell if someone came forward with footage of police doing wrong :2 cents:

I have zero respect for people who protest. People who riot are basically saying "I want instant response to my cause or problem or issue without putting in the time and effort to go through the proper channels".

You have the right to be heard; You do not have the right to destroy someone else's property and or tie up dozens if not hundreds of police officers.

OWS - what did that accomplish other than burning through our tax dollars and leaving behind a trail of lawsuits?

Funny they should call anyone murderers. I wonder what exactly Mark Duggan intended to do with the gun he collected minutes before.

The full family just come across as being scumbags...




http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/...04_306x475.jpg

Bang bang!

These comments sum it up:

.
.

and the usual crap from his family "he was an angel and a credit to the community!" Right! what sort of community has drug dealing scum with a gun as a "credit" to the community?

I would just love a news reporter to ask them that exact question when they are giving an interview. Which they no doubt will be over the next days, weeks, months... :disgust

brown? :2 cents:

Protest /= riot.

But
 

Seems like a waste of Police resources going after a small time crook.

The Cops fucked up over-reacted and shot an unarmed man in haste than tried to cover it up.


See the LEGAL INQUEST Info / Evidence below BEFORE you RUSH to Judgement.

Two officers testified he had a weapon. The forensic evidence did not support that, and other expert evidence suggested key parts of the police account were incorrect.

The jury decided Duggan threw the gun before police confronted him, and did not have it in his hand when shot.

Despite the verdict of lawful killing, a series of decisions by the Metropolitan police and the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), which investigates police shootings, damaged public confidence.

One informed Met source said: "It was death by a thousand fuckups."

The operation that culminated in Duggan being shot, Operation Dibri, was run by the Met's Trident unit, which investigates gun crime in London's black community. It relied on intelligence from the now-defunct Serious and Organised Crime Agency (Soca) about his alleged activities. Part of it was based on the bugging of Duggan's phone.

Aged 29, Duggan had just two relatively minor criminal convictions, one for possession of cannabis and one for handling stolen goods.

Source...the Legal Inquest as reported by the Guardian.

but guns are highly unusual in British society, anyone with a gun in public is no-longer a small time crook and instantly becomes a number one target to take off the streets - and rightly so. He was stupid enough to have a gun and I have no pity for him whatsoever.

i am looking to get a plasma tv.

Cops play with guns and they also do their best to intimidate the public here in the states now.

They are all dressed for combat. Fuck all cops!

I'm so surprised! Fuck *evidence*, especially if he was brown, eh?

"The jury said they were sure, by the same eight-to-two
majority, that Duggan did not have a weapon in his hands when police
surrounded him. By a majority, the jury concluded he "threw" the gun
from a cab he was travelling in when armed officers forced it to stop."

If only he was white, eh?

oh, the troll is awake. look at little Daimo trying to boost his little pecker by bringing race into it.

Hi, race and country traitor :upsidedow

Race was one part of my post. the fact, unarguable fact, he didn't have a gun and wasn't posing an immediate threat is the important part.

but I totally get why you ignored that part of my post.

it's hard to argue against fact, isn't it kiddo?

so do explain, why do you think it's cool to kill an unarmed man, aside from the fact he wasn't white?

Yeah, I am such a cunt for suggesting it's wrong to shoot an unarmed man.

DAMN ME AND MY LEFTY WAYS!

SHOOT ALL THE WOGS!

The Police shot an unarmed man.

If this had happened in Russia or China how would the Daily Mail and the other gutter press have reported it?

Terror State? KGB murder? Communist oppression?

It is sad that the fans of the Daily Mail here seem to have no capacity for independent thought just regurgitate the lightly disguised racism printed every day in that semi fascist rag.

As our un elected government cuts support for the poorest, concentrates wealth into fewer and fewer hands there is more and more reason to riot.

Fixed your very important typo. The people complaining about people being annoyed that an unarmed man was shot dead have to be racists/cunts. I can't think of a SINGLE logical reason why a rational human being would rejoice at an unarmed man being shot dead except for that.

But I wait with interest for the people in this thread applauding the po-po for killing an unarmed mad to justify it.

so is food that is not 90% grease. funny how the racist pour into these threads

http://www.ncc-1776.org/tle2010/tle558-20100221-07.html

not that you're going to read this.. or.. anything

Which is it:

But you are arguing against facts - he did have a gun, little Daimo. And stop trying to bring race into it, this has nothing to do with the fact that Duggen was a small-time drug dealer with a gun out on the streets. The only reason why you've brought race into the argument is to try and shout people down by using the very overused "racist" card, sorry but its been heard and used so many times before by you Dianne Abbot worshipers that it doesn't work anymore when the facts are staring you in the face. He did have a gun. Just because he was black doesn't change that fact - nothing racist about that.

Dianne Abbot is my MP - Vile woman and one of the worst racists I have had the misfortune of meeting...

As far as the Duggan shooting goes I wasn't there and I didn't hear the evidence that the jurors heard - However, I do know he was a drug dealer, he did have a gun and if you live by the sword etc.....

I've met a few people who have had the misfortune of working with her and they all say that too. They all said that she was very open with her racism. - she is one of the (many) reasons why I'll never again in my lifetime vote Labour, why they haven't thrown her out is totally beyond me, the Labour bigwigs MUST know about her views.

She is totally open about it - She left me speechless on more than occasion with some of the stuff she came out with - That doesn't happen often - lol...

I don't believe they shot him because of his colour.

A white guy in that same situation would surely have been shot as well.

But...he didn't. The jury voted 8:2 that he was unarmed?

Pick any source you prefer

https://www.google.co.uk/search?clie...f9OMGWhQf804Bg

The "being unarmed" situation?

..........

Indeed.

By the way how come all those "innocent child" (Saint Skittles) or "unarmed man" (this person) turns out to be criminal elements/thugs/gangsters.
Somehow it does not happen to regular folk that often, yet apologists still sing their "unarmed", "innocent" prays.

okay, how about the BBC? (lets see you try and claim that it's too right wing to have any "facts" that you and only you deem permissible, little Daimo)

Just ignore the stupid cunt

Duggan was a cunt, the old bill were bigger cunts. just because the old bill shot an unarmed man, doesn't mean duggan wasn't a cunt. And just because duggan was a cunt, he didn't deserve to be shot. Yep, Duggan was a scummy dealer, but is anyone really so blinkered as to believe the UK armed police aren't pumped up gung-ho macho men who think they are above the law? duggan wasn't above it, and did deserve to be dealt with - but lethal force by a load of testosterone fuelled Billy Big Bollocks' wasn't right, and wasn't lawful, no matter what a bunch of dumb fuck jurors may have said.

Cunt <--- didn't use that at all after the first sentence, so just throwing it in for good measure

Exactly.

So, he was unarmed for all of 5 seconds. Whoop dee doo !!

Give the guy a nobel peace prize...