![]() |
Riots starting in Oakland
The riots in Oakland have begun....
is that going to set the stage for the massive change coming to this country? |
nah, it will stay local
|
Please don't let this air in LA, we don't need another riot.
|
Quote:
Haha better park your car in underground parking or else it will get torched |
"The core group of protesters was about 40 people, several of whom were with Revolution Books, a Berkeley bookstore. A man distributing "The Revolution" newspaper shouted "This whole damn system is guilty!""
|
Fucking stupid idiots.
|
Quote:
|
Let me guess, black guy got shot by police?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It's a terrible situation, since it appears on the surface that the BART cop over-reacted.
That still is no excuse, or a license, for idiots to start smashing in windows of stores and cars of people in their own neighborhood whom had nothing to do with the situation. News is coming out that Oscar Grant (the 22 year old guy killed) was no angel either, even though some people are already trying to paint him as some kind of martyr: Quote:
ADG |
Mandingo Hayes....sounds like a porn star.
|
Quote:
It's horrible that anyone got shot by the police, accidental or motivated by hatred of race or what not. But that does not give groups of people the right to smash windows of local business that had nothing to do with any of this. I'm still pretty pissed about Prop 8, but you don't see me trying to set cars on fire. |
Quote:
I hope it was an accident. Not only for the reputation of police officers but for the sake of the good cops who are out there. Unfortunately, the situation was handled poorly. The cops proceeded to go around and illegally confiscate cell phones from bystanders to try and destroy evidence. No excuse for violent protests though. However, I understand their frustration. These cops should all have been terminated. Cops routinely get off with slaps on the wrists for their deadly actions. |
their "protest" really made them look worse then the actual incident itself
|
bunch of morons
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
all of those cops that confiscated cell phones should be brought to task for it, including the department itself |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local...-Shooting.html http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28521292/ Most of the news reports mention it. |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo Just from the news reports. They had some witnesses on TV too. http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local...-Shooting.html .the vid from 5 hours ago is labeled "protest turns violent..." the then one 4 hours ago is labeled "protest turns into riot" then the one from 4 minutes ago is labeled "near riot breaks out at protest" :error |
what? black ppl rioting??? this can't be true!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That is exactly why calmer heads should prevail. The TV station that first claimed to show proof on video that Grant's hands were cuffed, has since retracted that claim. As for the cops "illegally" confiscating cameras, they are simply collecting evidence. Now if they actually do destroy what is captured on the cameras, that would be illegal. I am not naive, since I recognize that there are some bad cops out there, however, I also feel that the system has to be allowed to run it's course. The community has every right to mourn and protest, however they do not have the right to become a lawless mob, and do property damage to people totally unassociated with the situation. I should also note, that the individuals whom seemed to be doing the most vandalism appeared to be hoodlums without a cause, or the wannabe revolutionaries from the same outside agitator groups that regularly sprout up to exploit any protest situation in the Bay Area, in order to recruit and further agitate the crowd into more violent action. ADG |
People that riot are fucking idiots just looking for any excuse to be a fucking prick. I'm sure most of those people have no fucking idea who the person even is. Oh look, it's whitey out to get the black people, grow the fuck up already !! The thing is, apparently the guy did something wrong and wasn't co-operating in order to get detained like that in the first place.
Sure, in this case, looking at the tape, it was a senseless death, but let the court system deal with it. If someone down the street from me got killed by a black police officer, what business is it of mine to go out and hurt others and destroy things ???? It's none of my fucking business, leave that up to the family of the deceased to take care of. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
are they lucky the victim who got shot was black, if he was white they wouldnt have an argument to smash stuff
what a bunch of fucking retards |
are police really allowed to seize people's cell phones as "evidence" without a warrant?
|
Ahhh... quick riot. I'm sure it will do alot of good.
Pissed at the man... so shit on your friends |
Q1:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The DOJ and courts apparently provide a good deal of latitude to law enforcement when it comes to search and seizure of electronic data (cell phones, computers, e-mail, etc). Check out this eye-opening DOJ document: Searching and Seizing Computers and Obtaining Electronic Evidence in Criminal Investigations D-a-y-u-m!!! On top of this, cameras on many street corners...say cheese, Big Brother is watching you... http://www.digitaljournal.com/img/1/...cecameras.jpeg ADG |
Quote:
|
The calm before the storm. Wait till the pigs are found not guilty.
|
Quote:
ADG |
Gross negligence and involuntary manslaughter sounds right to me. Very sad :(
"I thought it was my taser", pretty much covers it. And if someone thinks it's just a lie, then it's a stupid ass lie since it's admitting gross negligence. That officer surely knows it's all over for them one way or the other. |
This isn`t riot, this is some vannila bullshit.
|
Quote:
I believe that the stun guns that most police agencies are using have a grip almost exactly like the ones on the fire arms. So you can bet that it could have been a mistake. BUT You have to ask yourself what police agency would allow an officer to have on his belt from front to back a Fire arm, and then a stun gun. The stun gun gets in the way of drawing the fire arm, and in the event of extreme pressure, the officer could easily draw the stun gun instead.. I know that the Holster that most police agencies use is a Safari3 or model 3 or something like that. It has three safeties that have to be defeated to get the gun out. 1. Top snap. 2 thumb snap, and 3, the rear strap. So unless the Stun gun is carried the same way, the guy is a total idiot. |
"I thought it was my taser":1orglaugh
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123