GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Sarah Palin to commit US troops to a war against Russia (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=854468)

directfiesta 09-11-2008 07:38 PM

Sarah Palin to commit US troops to a war against Russia
 
... nice !!!!

Quote:


Sarah Palin shows hawkish streak in first interview

Suzanne Goldenberg and Ewen MacAskill in Washington
The Guardian,
Friday September 12 2008

A hawkish and occasionally combative Sarah Palin warned last night she might commit US troops to a war against Russia in defence of Georgia and Ukraine in her first interview since John McCain chose her as his running mate.

Palin, who admitted last night she made her first trip outside North America last year, also said she was certain she was ready to step in for McCain as president, if the Republican nominee were to be incapacitated. She said repeatedly she would not hesitate to use all options in an international crisis or resort to force against Islamist extremists.

"I have the confidence in that readiness and knowing that you can't blink. You have to be wired in a way of being so committed to the mission, the mission that we're on, reform of this country and victory in the war, you can't blink," Palin told ABC television.

Palin's interview was carefully stage-managed to counter criticism that she lacks foreign policy experience and to deflect media scrutiny of her personal life. But her occasionally stilted answers and uncompromising view of the world could sit uneasily with American voters, weary of the war on Iraq and the deteriorating situation in Afghanistan.

In sometimes tense exchanges, Palin demonstrated a more bellicose posture towards Russia than the Bush administration during the conflict with Georgia. She also supported military action against Islamist extremists in Pakistan even without the support of the Islamabad government.

Asked whether Nato membership would commit the US to going to war on behalf of Ukraine and Georgia if they were attacked, Palin said: "Perhaps so. I mean, that is the agreement when you are a Nato ally. If another country is attacked, you're going to be expected to be called upon and help. What I think is that smaller democratic countries that are invaded by a large power is something for us to be vigilant against."

She advocated speeding up full Nato membership for Georgia and Ukraine despite warnings from Moscow that it views attempts to expand US influence among the former Soviet states as provocative. Russia's invasion of Georgia was "unprovoked", she said and warned that America could not allow Moscow to control vital energy supplies. "We've got to keep an eye on Russia. For Russia to have exerted such pressure in terms of invading a smaller democratic country, unprovoked, is unacceptable," she said.

Last night's broadcast was the first of four programmes based on interviews with Palin conducted in her home town of Wasilla and Fairbanks both in Alaska.

The broadcasts will include footage of Palin's soldier son, Track, who was scheduled to deploy to Iraq yesterday. The Alaska governor, who touts herself as a moose-hunting, salmon-fishing, hockey mom turned political reformer, has faced a steady drip of negative stories about her record and her family including daughter Bristol, who is pregnant at 17.

Until the interviews, she had not taken questions from reporters, and at campaign rallies stuck closely to a scripted speech that is largely a distillation of her address to the party convention.

McCain's strategists are working hard to capitalise on Palin's appeal to Republican women as well as some former supporters of Hillary Clinton. Palin's instant popularity and the success of Republican effort to present her as a feminist icon, have put the Democrats off balance.

Meanwhile Barack Obama made a belated personal appeal to Bill Clinton yesterday for advice on how to mount a fightback and reverse a slide in the polls.

Talking to journalists before they began lunch, Clinton said: "I predict that Senator Obama will win and win pretty handily."

Obama added: "You can take it from the president of the United States. He knows a little something about politics."

Obama said he saw parallels between his campaign and Clinton's in 1992: a relatively unknown politician fighting the Republicans against a backdrop of an ailing economy. After the lunch, a joint statement issued on behalf of the two by Obama's team, said: "They discussed the campaign briefly, but mostly talked about how the world has changed since September 11 2001. They also spoke about what the next president can do to help make the economy work for all Americans, as it did under president Clinton."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008...08.sarahpalin1


well, wars are on the horizon ....

NickPapageorgio 09-11-2008 07:43 PM

http://cmsof.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/fruitcake2.jpg

Manowar 09-11-2008 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NickPapageorgio (Post 14742517)

:1orglaugh love it

BlackCrayon 09-11-2008 07:46 PM

Now boys I reckon this is it...nuclear combat toe to toe with the Ruskies.

directfiesta 09-11-2008 07:49 PM

Quote:

For Russia to have exerted such pressure in terms of invading a smaller democratic country, unprovoked, is unacceptable," she said.
Does she knows that the USA did just that with Iraq ????

marketsmart 09-11-2008 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NickPapageorgio (Post 14742517)

what kind of pizza is that?

baddog 09-11-2008 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 14742535)
Does she knows that the USA did just that with Iraq ????

Iraq was a democracy?

Odin 09-11-2008 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14742564)
Iraq was a democracy?

How about Lebanon than? The US sanctioned that war, and incursion and complete destruction of civilian peoples and infastructure. Whatever you might think it is a democracy, and in fact the model the US has tried to base Iraq off.

SuckOnThis 09-11-2008 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 14742564)
Iraq was a democracy?

Was Kuwait?

WarChild 09-11-2008 08:06 PM

I bet you think Fox News is totally misleading but the title of this post is not.

I wasn't aware that candidates for Vice President were able to commit troops to any war. I guess I learned something new. Thank goodness for GFY.

SuckOnThis 09-11-2008 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild (Post 14742611)
I bet you think Fox News is totally misleading but the title of this post is not.

I wasn't aware that candidates for Vice President were able to commit troops to any war. I guess I learned something new. Thank goodness for GFY.

Do the math, McCain has a 1 in 3 chance of kicking the bucket before 4 years is up.

directfiesta 09-11-2008 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis (Post 14742591)
Was Kuwait?


And ....

Is Saudia Arabia ?

How about Pakistan with Mushareff .... Since when you do not support ( or even establish ) dictatorship ?

listen to her ... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7611625.stm

Gibson ask once , twice, three times if she believes that it is OK to send troops in Pakistan, without the governement approval ... After two long bunch of words, he asks ;

Yes or No...

More words comes out of that mouth .....

Mr Pheer 09-11-2008 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NickPapageorgio (Post 14742517)

fuck that makes me hungry

directfiesta 09-11-2008 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild (Post 14742611)
I bet you think Fox News is totally misleading but the title of this post is not.

I wasn't aware that candidates for Vice President were able to commit troops to any war. I guess I learned something new. Thank goodness for GFY.


It is of issue that she could be president .... so the question was asked ... and answered as quoted above ...

What the fuck is the problem with you ????

Oh, true,,, WARchild ... you love it, don't you ... Well, let's hope British Columbia joins the USA. Then you can enroll... :2 cents:

WarChild 09-11-2008 08:13 PM

You might be translating commited wrong from that pansy language you guys speak in the shit parts of Quebec.

directfiesta 09-11-2008 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild (Post 14742657)
You might be translating commited wrong from that pansy language you guys speak in the shit parts of Quebec.

Probably, since it is a ' cut & paste ' word for word from the English Guardian article.. from the UK... I think that is where real english language originated from....

:321GFY

d-null 09-11-2008 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 14742553)
what kind of pizza is that?

in case you weren't joking, and at the risk of stating the obvious :1orglaugh


http://kemoactive.files.wordpress.co...uit-marked.jpghttp://atkinsfarms.com/store/media/cake-8inch.jpg

dav3 09-11-2008 08:29 PM

she is a whackjob religious fanatic who so hypocritically wants to start more wars.

The US military needs to be for defense, not offense.

Young 09-11-2008 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild (Post 14742611)
I bet you think Fox News is totally misleading but the title of this post is not.

I wasn't aware that candidates for Vice President were able to commit troops to any war. I guess I learned something new. Thank goodness for GFY.

what a retarded fucking argument

WarChild 09-11-2008 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 14742683)
Probably, since it is a ' cut & paste ' word for word from the English Guardian article.. from the UK... I think that is where real english language originated from....

:321GFY

You cut and paste the title of the thread or that was of your own making?

It doesn't read "Sarah Palin would commit", or "Sarah Palin wants to commit" .. instead you wrote "Saradn Palin to commit ..." As if it was inevitable.

Quote:

Asked whether Nato membership would commit the US to going to war on behalf of Ukraine and Georgia if they were attacked, Palin said: "Perhaps so. I mean, that is the agreement when you are a Nato ally.
Again you don't see the irony at all when Fox News spins something, but if it makes your point ... Game on?

_Richard_ 09-11-2008 08:50 PM

russia attacked unprovoked? seriously?

Brujah 09-11-2008 08:52 PM

What happened to her foreign relations experience with Russia?

Phil 09-11-2008 08:54 PM

dumb redneck bitch

tony286 09-11-2008 09:20 PM

Well they get in office plan on the draft coming back.

SoloGirlsContent 09-11-2008 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NickPapageorgio (Post 14742517)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

SoloGirlsContent 09-11-2008 09:52 PM

this bitch is really scaring me

http://huffingtonpost.com
http://www.thenutfactory.com/photos/...-deluxe-rs.jpg

Nicky 09-11-2008 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 14742553)
what kind of pizza is that?

Fruit Cake :upsidedow

WarChild 09-11-2008 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 14742996)
Well they get in office plan on the draft coming back.

Yes of course, right. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

borys 09-11-2008 10:31 PM

Quote:

For Russia to have exerted such pressure in terms of invading a smaller democratic country, unprovoked, is unacceptable," she said.
Well, "unprovoked" is total bullshit of course. I still think this 'Palin will go to war with Russia'-issue is being played up. She said she wants Georgia join the Nato, which would mean all Nato allies would have to come to help if Russia invaded Georgia again. That's a stupid, but not an uncommon view. All Republicans say that.

There are much better embarrassments in that interview. For example, she didn't know what the Bush Doctrine is. Which proves she hasn't read a newspaper for at least 7 years. :1orglaugh

SoloGirlsContent 09-11-2008 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by borys (Post 14743220)
Well, "unprovoked" is total bullshit of course. I still think this 'Palin will go to war with Russia'-issue is being played up. She said she wants Georgia join the Nato, which would mean all Nato allies would have to come to help if Russia invaded Georgia again. That's a stupid, but not an uncommon view. All Republicans say that.

There are much better embarrassments in that interview. For example, she didn't know what the Bush Doctrine is. Which proves she hasn't read a newspaper for at least 7 years. :1orglaugh

I said it once I'll say it 100 times That bitch is NUTS...
http://www.nuthealth.org/images/nut_splash.jpg

spunkmaster 09-11-2008 10:53 PM

The question was "If Georgia was a member of NATO" !

I bet Obama's answer would be the exact same answer because any NATO
member attacked is an attack on all the members of NATO.

Matt 26z 09-11-2008 10:54 PM

She has also stated that she would "choose life" in the cases of rape pregnancies.

You got that Republican parents?

If your little white daughter is raped, she WILL be keeping the black baby under Plain.

WarChild 09-11-2008 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 14743267)
She has also stated that she would "choose life" in the cases of rape pregnancies.

You got that Republican parents?

If your little white daughter is raped, she WILL be keeping the black baby under Plain.

Just, fucking, awesome.

I didn't know the Vice President did things like, you know, over rule the Supreme Court.

Another lesson for me. You Americans sure know your political system well!

Gouge 09-11-2008 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 14742996)
Well they get in office plan on the draft coming back.

You do realise that Charlie Rangel (Democrat) from New York has entered a draft reinstatement bill onto the Congress floor 13 times since 03 dont you? Do a search if you want to educate yourself on the issue, by the way its been blocked by Republican members of Congress everytime.

TDF 09-11-2008 11:33 PM

http://i35.tinypic.com/nxpav9.jpg

dav3 09-12-2008 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TDF (Post 14743323)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

TheDoc 09-12-2008 12:52 AM

Just more proof that we will have 4 more years of the same bullshit.

IllTestYourGirls 09-12-2008 02:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spunkmaster (Post 14743261)
The question was "If Georgia was a member of NATO" !

I bet Obama's answer would be the exact same answer because any NATO
member attacked is an attack on all the members of NATO.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 14743424)
Just more proof that we will have 4 more years of the same bullshit.

exactly. we are screwed either way.

seeandsee 09-12-2008 03:31 AM

that is stupid, who wants nuclear war?

~Ray 09-12-2008 04:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TDF (Post 14743323)

worthy of a new avatar


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123