![]() |
Pres. Bush, a bigger terrorist than Osama bin Laden....
Just realized as I was driving home tonight that Bush started a war that had nothing to do with what happened on 9/11. (Iraq may have had an asshole for a leader, but he had nothing to do with that day, and harbored no terrorists. That's a fact. They also had no WMD's and were no direct threat to the U.S.) And now, the Iraq war has killed more americans than Osama bin Laden did on September the 11th, 2001.
As of last week, the U.S. death toll in Iraq was 3500. That makes him more deadly to U.S citizens than any terrorist organization. No matter what anyone thinks or says, those are the facts, and that is pretty fucking sad. |
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Bush / Cheney '08
|
Quote:
|
Lets do some politics here ... :)
|
Only in America
|
Quote:
Your comparison of President Bush with Bin Laden is inflamatory, inaccurate, ignorant, and despicable. :mad: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
You are wrong on so many levels its funny. Who said Iraq had anything to do with 9/11? Bush did not kill those troops, terrorists did. The same terrorists that would be trying to get into the USA if our troops were not in the front lines drawing them to a battle were we are losing very few people and they are losing a lot.
|
Quote:
And the weapons he did have, the chemical weapons. USA sold him that shit. |
You guys think your country is so great, but the truth is it is run by psychotic mobsters who doesnt give a shit about you. Wake the fuck up.
|
Quote:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=iovdIiSE8T8 And to break the cycle of lies that this administration would have you believe: you said: "Bush did not kill those troops, terrorists did. The same terrorists that would be trying to get into the USA if our troops were not in the front lines drawing them to a battle were we are losing very few people and they are losing a lot" And this is the cycle of lies that Bush people tell themselves. THERE WERE NO AL QAEDA TERRORISTS IN IRAQ BEFORE BUSH INVADED. His advisors that have since quit his cabinet, warned him that he, Bush, would turn Iraq into a terrorist haven if he invaded and that's exactly what happened. Those U.S. soldiers would not have been killed had we never invaded Iraq, try and get that thru your head. |
man, you can really tell when summer break from school arrives
|
Quote:
:( |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You're like a broken record of retardation. Quote:
Just in case you're too dumb to realise it, Iraq was in a war with a Iran, a war where the US supported Iraq. Yes, they supported that evil dictator Saddam. Yes, gas was used against Iran, in a wartime situation and yes, gas was used against the kurds in the same wartime situation because many of them had conspired with the Iranians against the Iraqi state and that qualifies as treason. Many countries, yours included, consider the penalty for treason to be death. So learn your history sonny. Because you keep dribbling shit and I find your ignorant jingoism irritating. |
Quote:
The USA feeds on wars, whatever they are .... |
Iraq was invaded for one reason and one reason only.
After the first Iraq war Bush Senior left Saddam in power. Of course it was out of self interest that he did so but that's neither here nor there. He left Saddam in power. A few years later Saddam showed his gratitude by trying to assassinate Bush Senior. Bad move. Heads of state are not supposed to do that sort of shit. It's that simple. Where Bush Junior fucked up was by not learning the Vietnam lesson and electing to fight a guerilla war with no exit plan. That too was just plain dumb. If Bush Junior has a clue, he would, upon capturing Baghdad, have put one of Saddam's generals in charge and got the fuck out of there. Trust me, that's the way it will be written in the history books. |
Quote:
how old are you ... |
Quote:
Since the 1970's, the U.S. has justified similar actions by stating that it's _INTERNAL_ policy on assassination is not trumped by its need for self defense... basically meaning the original "no assassination" policy _OF THE UNITED STATES_ (I'm not sure why you think another country would be restricted by U.S. policies in that area) is null and void since it can easily be justified away as "in defense" of the country at any given time. ===== If there's one thing that the Bush presidency has shown, imho, it's how gullible and uninformed and sheep-like the American populace - as a whole - really is. |
This thread just reminded me of Fahrenheit 911...hmm...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
guantanamo is the biggest joke of all. |
Quote:
|
This reminds me.
It's the last few days to sign the ACLU's petition for their "Day of Action" on June 26. It addresses the suspension of Habeas Corpus and a couple other issues central to Liberties that have been trampled on as of late. If you've yet to, you may sign the petition here: https://secure.aclu.org/site/SPageSe...abeas_petition |
Quote:
That will show them! :thumbsup |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
To begin with we might wanna actually charge the people with crimes BEFORE we stick them in prison.. Only a moron thinks there could ever be a fair system of imprisoning people based on no charges.. DAYUUM |
Quote:
Five years without trials, kidnapped from foreign soil ...., numerous US courts ( including military ) confirming the illegality of the process .... torture, and so on ... " Heck of a job....:thumbsup " |
Quote:
The US did not start the war with Japan. Have you heard of Pearl Harbor? Instead of ending the war with the bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, would you have preferred a more drawn out ending, with the Japanese fighting to the last gasp and *millions* of Japanese *and* American casualties? Glad you weren't making that decision. Thank goodness for Harry Truman. To fill you in, the Japanese were fanatical and prepared to fight to the bitter end. |
took you 4 years to figure that out ? grats. I dont like Bush but im for a better iraq at this point and against a pull out. Last thing the Iraqis need is your pessimism and pitty. Half of you just feel like dissing the US, you dont give a shit about those iraqis :]
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
in the example you posted above you stated saddam used wmd's against kurds.. you did realise the kurds attacked saddam first . so what your saying here is that its ok to use wmd's if you were attacked first. p.s. you forgot to mention why they used wmd's on vietnam who certainly didnt attack us first mr history buff :winkwink: .. |
i think the real history lesson here is that the MAJORITY of americans are almost never wrong.. When leaders ignore the "majority" of the people , they fuck up..
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123