GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   DRAMA: Bush haters and Bush lovers aboard! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=718126)

marketsmart 03-25-2007 07:44 PM

DRAMA: Bush haters and Bush lovers aboard!
 
Whether you like or hate President Bush, how many of you think that if Iran doesn't release the sailors seized a few days ago and Britain decides on military action; should the US get involved?

seeric 03-25-2007 07:45 PM

they shouldnt but of course they will.

stickyfingerz 03-25-2007 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 12146783)
Whether you like or hate President Bush, how many of you think that if Iran doesn't release the sailors seized a few days ago and Britain decides on military action; should the US get involved?

Im thinking alot of good glasswear could come out of the area....

crockett 03-25-2007 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 12146783)
Whether you like or hate President Bush, how many of you think that if Iran doesn't release the sailors seized a few days ago and Britain decides on military action; should the US get involved?


Well I can't stand Bush, but I've always thought Iran should have been the original target. They are and always have been the real threat and supporters of terrorism.

I wouldn't want to go into another war with Bush as president he's fucked up so much already it's not ever funny. On a side note, one thing I can say about Bush. Is if those had been US sailors we likely would have lobbed a few cruise missiles at them already.

Iran is one of the few nations that's I'd agree with attacking first. North Korea is another.

dissipate 03-25-2007 08:02 PM

Splum in 5...4..3...2..1...

chupacabra 03-25-2007 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissipate (Post 12146844)
Splum in 5...4..3...2..1...

lol, true enough... and to the posted above, bush doesn't have the balls to go into n. korea (because china isn't going to share a border w/ a us colony)..

he-fox 03-25-2007 08:11 PM

no, US should not get involved.

besides this, the british sailors will be released.

LiveDose 03-25-2007 08:13 PM

If those soldiers are hurt or executed the retaliation should be massive and yes the US should help its ally if asked.

BusterBunny 03-25-2007 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiveDose (Post 12146890)
If those soldiers are hurt or executed the retaliation should be massive and yes the US should help its ally if asked.

yup, we would expect the same of them:thumbsup

marketsmart 03-25-2007 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BusterBunny (Post 12146893)
yup, we would expect the same of them:thumbsup

Thank you... although i think that Iraq has always been a losing proposition for the US, I appreciate the fact that Britain has been with us since the beginning.

agian, i think we have tried and failed with iraq, if iran fucks with britain, we have to have their back....

DaddyHalbucks 03-25-2007 10:00 PM

Bush hasn't "fucked up" anything. Our country has gone soft. We have unrealistic expectations. Critics blast Bush for taking years, but the real timetable for changing that area is several decades, if not longer.

There are so many reasons to hit Iraq it isn't even funny. The abduction of the UK sailors is just another in a long list.

chupacabra 03-25-2007 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 12147361)
There are so many reasons to hit Iraq it isn't even funny. The abduction of the UK sailors is just another in a long list.

do you even read? it was IRANIANS who took the british servicemen into custody, not iraqis..

TheSenator 03-25-2007 10:10 PM

Fuck no... I want my soliders back..... The British should be savvy enough to handle this kind of conundrum.

Negotiation is a bitch but it always happen even with the worst of them.

DaddyHalbucks 03-25-2007 10:27 PM

I meant Iran. It is late. I am tired.

mikeyddddd 03-26-2007 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 12147361)
Bush hasn't "fucked up" anything.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

frank7799 03-26-2007 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 12146783)
Whether you like or hate President Bush, how many of you think that if Iran doesn't release the sailors seized a few days ago and Britain decides on military action; should the US get involved?

Sooner or later you have to decide to convert to Islam, give up porn or get stoned versus nuke Iran.:2 cents:

Azoy? 03-26-2007 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12146786)
Im thinking alot of good glasswear could come out of the area....

the US can't nuke them for the exact same reason they went into Iraq. They don't want to pay 150 dollars for oil.
if they nuke the area you wouldn't be able to get any oil from the ground for the next 150 years or so so that's out.
the reason they took UK sailors is because they know if they did this to the US it would be considered an act of war by the US and there would be far greater sections in the UN although I don't think the US would have attacked until necessary (such as a soldier getting hurt or killed) because the arm forces are stretched out as much as they can at this time.
the US should get involved if the UK asked them because the UK was there when the US asked them for support in Iraq. if they don't it would mean that no country would trust them again when it comes to needing support in return.
and just for the record no matter what Iran says about water this or that the reason they are doing this is to find out how far they can go before retaliation is done.
think about it, they know the world needs their oil so unless we stop oil flow from Iran to the world and are willing to pay for higher prices to show them we don't need them they will continue to have not only the western world but the entire world around their little finger.
if china and other countries supported not buying oil from Iran they would wake up and say SHIT WE ARE IN TROUBLE, LETS PLAY BALL WITH THOSE GUYS CAUSE WE CAN'T PLAY GAMES WITH THEM ANYMORE. THEY FOUND OTHER PLACES TO BUY THE OIL THEY NEED AND WE ARE NO LONGER HOLDING THE BALL.

King Adam 03-26-2007 07:59 AM

Nothing will happen. Iran will release he sailers for sure. They know if they don't that they will get blasted.

Dirty Dane 03-26-2007 08:01 AM

who cares? Millions have died already because of the Bushes.................................

Brad 03-26-2007 08:08 AM

where is splum? normally he would be all over this kind of thing like a fat kid on a smartie.

And no, I don't think that the US should get involved, but like many have already pointed out they probably will.

Azoy? 03-26-2007 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Dane (Post 12149043)
who cares? Millions have died already because of the Bushes.................................

yep. they are just as dirty if not more so then the Kennedy's were.

uno 03-26-2007 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 12147483)
I meant Iran. It is late. I am tired.

Must have been a Freudian slip.

StuartD 03-26-2007 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 12147361)
Bush hasn't "fucked up" anything.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Dvae 03-26-2007 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty Dane (Post 12149043)
who cares? Millions have died already because of the Bushes.................................

Millions?
Where do you get those statistics?

Domain Distribution 03-26-2007 09:02 AM

There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an idiot.

porno jew 03-26-2007 09:03 AM

should have nuked those cunts a long time ago.

directfiesta 03-26-2007 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chupacabra (Post 12147381)
do you even read? it was IRANIANS who took the british servicemen into custody, not iraqis..

:1orglaugh

why would he need to read ? just a mouthpiece

Splum 03-26-2007 09:40 AM

http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/200...03_468x269.jpg

Phoenix 03-26-2007 09:42 AM

wag the dog...you guys should watch that movie

Splum 03-26-2007 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 12149505)
wag the dog...you guys should watch that movie

Yes because we know that movies are reality, or at least to you they are. Isnt that movie based on Bill Clintons life?

Shakula 03-26-2007 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 12146830)
Well I can't stand Bush, but I've always thought Iran should have been the original target. They are and always have been the real threat and supporters of terrorism.

I wouldn't want to go into another war with Bush as president he's fucked up so much already it's not ever funny. On a side note, one thing I can say about Bush. Is if those had been US sailors we likely would have lobbed a few cruise missiles at them already.

Iran is one of the few nations that's I'd agree with attacking first. North Korea is another.

What terrorism activity has iran been helping?

porno jew 03-26-2007 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shakula (Post 12149541)
What terrorism activity has iran been helping?

killing US soldiers in iraq, raghead.

Shakula 03-26-2007 09:55 AM

United States of Terrorism has killed more people then good ol´ CCCP
And they keep talking about freedom, L O L!

How many children died in the sanctions against Iraq?
And Bush whine´s about Saddam killing a few thousand ppl here and there.

Haha. Stupidity.

Shakula 03-26-2007 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 12149552)
killing US soldiers in iraq, raghead.

The war on Iraq is illegal, its not terrorism killing US soldiers in Iraq.
You went into Iraq illegaly. But then again, you are to stupid to see this issue.

Quote:

Iraq war was illegal -Kofi Annan

US should stop doing Israel´s dirtywork.
You have nothing to gain from this.

Sarah_Jayne 03-26-2007 10:21 AM

It will play *much* better with the British public if the British gov't are seen to be the ones that fix this.

Angelo22 03-26-2007 10:24 AM

US shouldnt have been involved in the last couple of wars.
But for money, it stuck its nose in other countries' biz.

I suppose Bush will wipe the queens wrinkly ass and 'propose to help'

Sarah_Jayne 03-26-2007 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angelo22 (Post 12149711)
US shouldnt have been involved in the last couple of wars.
But for money, it stuck its nose in other countries' biz.

I suppose Bush will wipe the queens wrinkly ass and 'propose to help'

yeah because it isn't like they are there to help the US or anything *rolls eyes*

Angelo22 03-26-2007 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarah_MaxCash (Post 12149759)
yeah because it isn't like they are there to help the US or anything *rolls eyes*

What do you mean?
whom are you referring to with that 'they'?

Matt 26z 03-26-2007 10:53 AM

Democrats introduce a bill to bring the troops home next year and suddenly this happens. Odd, don't you think?

They were ordered to sail where they did, and Iran was tipped off where they'd be. Are we really expected to believe that Iran captured British forces at sea on their own and took them back to Iran? Please. Backup would have been called and there would have been a conflict right there.

czarina 03-26-2007 10:54 AM

Bush hater here, big time!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123