Father of the Year? Man kills neighbor who molested his 2 yr old daughter...
 

http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/08/30/ne....ap/index.html

I can't say I would have reacted much differently.

Hey Macarana

how about nailing his balls to a tree stump and cutting them off with a dull axe.....

Hey! I wonder where you got that? But ya gotta get it right:


Nail his balls to a table inside a cabin in the woods. Give him a dull knife. Set cabin on fire. He'll have to cut off his own balls with the dull knife if he wants to escape the burning cabin. Just in case he does so, I'll be waiting outside with a shotgun.

except i was talking about something my step dad use to say but yeah i do remember yours now.. men have some scary thoughts

While I can?t really advocate murder of human beings (unlike those filthy flea-ridden furry fleshbag felines)? I most likely would have did the same thing IF the guy actually molested the child, doesn?t look like there was any proof/indication that it occurred. Personally I think it would have been much ?better? for the guy to have went to prison; they treat child molesters real well from what I?m told. :thumbsup

So he killed a 58 year old sick fucker that lived with his 87 your old mother.

This dude should be made a hero not locked up!!!!

So now the kid has no dad on top of being molested.

Dad's an attorney. He'll get himself some great representation and get off with a slap on the wrist, I bet.

Ya told you my solution to this in a different thread.

Broomstick from ass all the way out his mouth. Slice him with razor blades, put him over a pit with a low to medium fire. Rotate and baste in lemon juice. Pig on a fuckin spit if he did that to my daughter. Only thing is no one would of found him. Would of just disappeared. No body no charges. :2 cents:

Ok it sounds like Ive thought that through too much... :Oh crap

Capt. Gary MacNamara said that police had not received a complaint about the child being assaulted before the killing, and "we have no indication it's true or not true."

If it can be determined that the guy who was killed actually commited an offense, the guy that killed him is may still face a manslaughter charge.

If it turns out there was no crime, and he wrongfully murdered the guy, he could be looking at some serious jail time, and then his daughter will not have a father around to raise her.

People proposed similar punishment/retribution for Mark Karr, even though it now turns out he didn't commit the crime so many people passionately believed he did.

If the wife of the man who was killed had told the Police, they could have determined if in fact a crime had been commited, and then dealt with the matter accordingly.

What if the wife told the murderer a false story in the hope that her husband would be hurt/killed?

I try not to overact to what I see in the news, since it often is distorted/wrong.

ADG Webmaster

Good for him. Hopefully the jury lets him go.

Climbing in a window sure sounds pre-meditated to me. He is fucked.

That's easy to get around. Man comes home, finds out the neighbor molested his daughter, becomes so furious he doesn't bother with a door, he just climbs into the man's bedroom through the window... sure sounds like temporary insanity to me! :)

I don't know the facts of the case but if my daughter was ever touched inappropriately by a stranger he would be seriously injured.

I know Brazilian Jiu Jitsu like I know how to ride a bike. I would get his back sink in a rear naked choke, then after he/she is knocked out proceed to an arm bar, snapping both arms, then as he is coming to, roll into a leg lock snapping his leg in half. After all that, I would piss and take a dump on him.

You think a window would be faster than a door? He is screwed, and you know it.

If they can prove the molestation, it'll be hard to get a jury to lock this guy up. He'll plead temporary insanity, which I couldn't imagine any father in this world wouldn't have after finding out that information. If you put 12 parents on that stand, there is no way they get a conviction.

For an angry dad? Hell yeah a window would be faster.

1. Wait for the 87 year old mother to answer the door, allowing her son to escape through his window.

2. Surprise the mother fucker by climbing right into his bedroom.


#2 sounds faster to me. Which is why he'll get off. There are two of us here who disagree. He only needs 1 out of 11.

For a lawyer, he didn't think this out too well...but I guess all logic goes out the door when you find soemthing like that out.

#2 is faster and premeditated. He is screwed and will go to jail for a long time. Yes, it is fucked up what happened but he is not judge, jury and executioner. That is the law and this is not the wild west anymore.

No way. I'm an angry dad. I want to get to that bastard as quickly as possible.

Only 1 out of 11 have to agree with me.

A) It was somethign someone told him. Even the cops are unsure it was even true.

B) Even if true, yep spending the rest of your life in prison away from you child is real fucking smart.

So you get a hung jury and get a new trial all the while you are in jail away from your kid. No way you get an aquital. The dude is fucked.

Nah, I bet he'll be out on bail. It'll be interesting to watch this case. And if it can be proven the man molested his daughter this case isn't even a challenge.

if the kid says he molested her, he should be found innocent.

Yes because the justice system just loves when people take the law into their own hands. If anything they'll be harder on this guy to discourage this behavior in others.

Everyone likes to talk about innoncent until proven guilty, but god forbid someone tell you a rumor that your kid was molested then it's ok to kill someone.

That's retarded. Do we live by laws or is this anarchy? extenuating circumstances yes, but scott free for murder? no way.

You haven't been watching enough Law and Order. :1orglaugh Happens all the time!

You get legal advice from Law and Order?

A lot of people still believe that John Ramsey may have murdered his own daughter to cover up that she had been molested by himself or another family member.

Who is to say, that this lawyer who murdered his neighbor didn't murder him to cover up that he (the lawyer) was molesting his own daughter?

I'm not arguing that this is the case, because I don't know. I am simply pointing out that given the lack of facts, many things could have happened that we don't know about, and perhaps people shouldn't be so quick to pound their chests and start frothing at the mouth when they don't have the facts.

I guess thinking rationally is not as much fun though for some, as manifesting unhealthy thoughts about mutilating someone who may or may not have done something wrong.

ADG Webmaster

You have a point. However, they will have to convince a jury to convict him of murder. I'm guessing they can find 1 juror who will have enough compassion to let this guy go.

Shit, All praise to him, I WOULD HAVE DONE WORSE. Matter of fact I think he gave that fuck an easy death!

Connecticut Bail Law: Defendants charged with a capital felony offense punishable by the death sentence (e.g., capital felony murder, murder, felony murder, arson murder) are not eligible for bail.

I doubt any DA will go for the death penalty here.

1 juror wanting to let him go results in a hung jury and he is retried. It does not let him go free!

taking someones live is never a good thing
but mayeb in this case i can look the other way

1 jurer can turn the opinions of the other 10. I saw it in a movie so it must be true.

Many times they won't retry after a hung jury.

And if the guy was innoncent? I mean if someone told you that I molested your kid you'd automatically kill me without finding out the truth? The of course since you kill and innoncent person one of my family members wil have to kill you in revenge, which of course and one of your family member will have to kill my family member that killed you and so on.

so if the jury is hung.... they go to court again? and if so, can it be for the same crime?..