GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Ann Coulter says 9/11 widows are enjoying their husbands death (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=618987)

ThunderBalls 06-07-2006 04:53 PM

Ann Coulter says 9/11 widows are enjoying their husbands death
 
Would someone just put a sock in this bitches mouth?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13186261/

WASHINGTON - New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton lashed out at Ann Coulter for a ?vicious, mean-spirited attack? on a group of outspoken 9/11 widows, whom the right-wing television pundit described as ?self-obsessed? and enjoying their husbands? deaths.

Coulter writes in a new book, ?Godless: The Church of Liberalism,? that a group of New Jersey widows whose husbands perished in the World Trade Center act ?as if the terrorist attacks happened only to them.?

She also wrote, ?I?ve never seen people enjoying their husbands? deaths so much.?

hershie 06-07-2006 04:59 PM

I have to change the channel right away if she is on. I loathe her.

Well Dunn 06-07-2006 05:06 PM

I dont much care for her but she makes a decent point. It's just like cindy sheehan, she used her sons death for attention and political propaganda. I feel bad for anyone who loses a loved one, but I start to lose my sympathy once I see them using that loss for their own gain.

ronbotx 06-07-2006 05:09 PM

The "Jersey Girls", like Cindy Sheehan, have used their personal losses to become political activists.

Simply put, they are not immune criticism, since they have no problem using the media and other public forums to "blame and flame" others..... :disgust

uno 06-07-2006 05:16 PM

fucking-around-and-business-discussion/618986-wow-coulter-calls-9-11-widows-witches.html

I was first. :)

Loryn 06-07-2006 05:59 PM

Mrs.Clinton spoke out against Coulter's comment's, which are totally being misunderstood you know the drive by media anything to support one way of thinking, but not my point, and this is what Coulter said to Mrs. Clinton:

ANN COULTER RESPONDS TO SEN. CLINTON: 'BEFORE CRITICIZING OTHERS FOR BEING 'MEAN' TO WOMEN, PERHAPS HILLARY SHOULD TALK TO HER HUSBAND WHO WAS ACCUSED OF RAPE BY JUANITA BROADDRICK AND WAS GROPING KATHLEEN WILLEY AT THE VERY MOMENT WILLEY'S HUSBAND WAS COMMITTING SUICIDE.'

CAT FIGHT MEOW.... :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

After Shock Media 06-07-2006 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loryn-Adult.com
AND WAS GROPING KATHLEEN WILLEY AT THE VERY MOMENT WILLEY'S HUSBAND WAS COMMITTING SUICIDE.'

That sounds like some serious inside info.
Thats it Ann Coulter killed Kathleen Willey's husband in order to try to take down Clinton. She only knew about the groping because she also had him under live surveillance.

tenderobject 06-07-2006 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Well Dunn
but I start to lose my sympathy once I see them using that loss for their own gain.

same here..

xxxdesign-net 06-07-2006 06:07 PM

Isnt Loryn a big fan of crazy Ann Coulter? lol

GatorB 06-07-2006 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Well Dunn
I dont much care for her but she makes a decent point. It's just like cindy sheehan, she used her sons death for attention and political propaganda. I feel bad for anyone who loses a loved one, but I start to lose my sympathy once I see them using that loss for their own gain.

You are a retard. Even Fox News thinks she went too far.

I mean is this called for

"And by the way, how do we know their husbands weren't planning to divorce these harpies? Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they'd better hurry up and appear in Playboy..."

Grrr! Ann Coulter Goes Too Far

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,198597,00.html

hershie 06-07-2006 06:09 PM

I think I heard Tucker Carlson on MSNBC yesterday call her "the most despised person in the western hemisphere" or something similar.

GatorB 06-07-2006 06:09 PM

Sorry if this offends the ladies but Coulter needs to be ganged raped in the ass by 20 guy infected with AIDS. It is what she deserves.

xxxdesign-net 06-07-2006 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Well Dunn
I dont much care for her but she makes a decent point. It's just like cindy sheehan, she used her sons death for attention and political propaganda. I feel bad for anyone who loses a loved one, but I start to lose my sympathy once I see them using that loss for their own gain.

lmao... you make no sense... the media gave her the attention.. she lost a son and that drives her to denounce what she's against of.. Political propaganda...? yeah.. you couldnt spot political propaganda even if it was flashing at the top of the TV screen... You like the republicans much?

FunForOne 06-07-2006 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB
Sorry if this offends the ladies but Coulter needs to be ganged raped in the ass by 20 guy infected with AIDS. It is what she deserves.



If you had someone sitting next to you that was 3 times smarter than you, Ann Coulter would still be smarter than the two of you put together.

xxxdesign-net 06-07-2006 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FunForOne
If you had someone sitting next to you that was 3 times smarter than you, Ann Coulter would still be smarter than the two of you put together.

You dont seem to have a clue what inteligence is... but ofcourse, she'll always impress people dumber than her... :thumbsup

GatorB 06-07-2006 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FunForOne
If you had someone sitting next to you that was 3 times smarter than you, Ann Coulter would still be smarter than the two of you put together.

Yeah what ever dipshit. Let me know when the next Mensa meeting in your town is and we'll talk. You CAN get into Mensa can you?

uno 06-07-2006 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FunForOne
If you had someone sitting next to you that was 3 times smarter than you, Ann Coulter would still be smarter than the two of you put together.

I'm not sure whether you are implying that ann coulter is incredibly smart or he is incredibly stupid.

FunForOne 06-07-2006 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno
I'm not sure whether you are implying that ann coulter is incredibly smart or he is incredibly stupid.


Actually both.

But it is not hard to compare intelligence with a guy that spams porn boards with his UFO sightings.

GatorB 06-07-2006 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno
I'm not sure whether you are implying that ann coulter is incredibly smart or he is incredibly stupid.

he thinks that it's ok to say that the dead husbands of 9-11 were going to divorce thier "witchy" wives anways because they were getting too old.

FunForOne 06-07-2006 06:22 PM

actually, I think I have him confused with someone else.

GatorB 06-07-2006 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FunForOne
Actually both.

But it is not hard to compare intelligence with a guy that spams porn boards with his UFO sightings.

When when have I ever said anything about seeing a UFO? Link please.

FunForOne 06-07-2006 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB
he thinks that it's ok to say that the dead husbands of 9-11 were going to divorce thier "witchy" wives anways because they were getting too old.


Of course not. But she actually made a great point. I think someone already compared it to the cindy sheehan deal. This news is not new. Its been all over the talk shows and internet all day and no one can argue against her point.

Her point is that these ladies are being used by the left wing because they knowthe media and everyone else will attack anyone who proves them wrong. A very good example of this is your response is immediatly attacking me based on the wives of dead husbands, not the fact that these women have made millions making political statements that are inaccurate and misleading at best.

uno 06-07-2006 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FunForOne
actually, I think I have him confused with someone else.

I think that's GregB

GatorB 06-07-2006 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FunForOne
Of course not. But she actually made a great point. I think someone already compared it to the cindy sheehan deal. This news is not new. Its been all over the talk shows and internet all day and no one can argue against her point.

Her point is that these ladies are being used by the left wing because they knowthe media and everyone else will attack anyone who proves them wrong. A very good example of this is your response is immediatly attacking me based on the wives of dead husbands, not the fact that these women have made millions making political statements that are inaccurate and misleading at best.

More retardation by you. Bush uses 9-11 victims all the time to wipe his ass with the Constitution.

DaddyHalbucks 06-07-2006 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Well Dunn
I dont much care for her but she makes a decent point. It's just like cindy sheehan, she used her sons death for attention and political propaganda. I feel bad for anyone who loses a loved one, but I start to lose my sympathy once I see them using that loss for their own gain.

Sheehan is the pits. What a bitch!

Why is her son any more important than the other hundreds of thousands of American soldiers who have died for our country?

She comforts the enemy and brings dishonor upon herself.

chase 06-07-2006 06:28 PM

Of course they will use whatever was the catalyst for their activism as a tool. That's how to turn a negative event into something positive..like the parents of kids who get hurt on unsafe baby equipment using that event as a platform to further their cause-making safe baby equipment. I know it's an apples and oranges comparison, but to expect them to sit home and do nothing when they feel so strongly about something is really unrealistic. If my son was killed in the war, and it made my voice louder than the other anti-war cryers, damn right I'd be using that to get my message across.

FunForOne 06-07-2006 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno
I think that's GregB


I think you are correct.

DaddyHalbucks 06-07-2006 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks
What a bitch!


Oops.

I said bitch, but I meant CUNT.

DaddyHalbucks 06-07-2006 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThunderBalls
Would someone just put a sock in this bitches mouth?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13186261/

WASHINGTON - New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton lashed out at Ann Coulter for a ?vicious, mean-spirited attack? on a group of outspoken 9/11 widows, whom the right-wing television pundit described as ?self-obsessed? and enjoying their husbands? deaths.

Coulter writes in a new book, ?Godless: The Church of Liberalism,? that a group of New Jersey widows whose husbands perished in the World Trade Center act ?as if the terrorist attacks happened only to them.?

She also wrote, ?I?ve never seen people enjoying their husbands? deaths so much.?

Ann Coulter is sexy as hell !

If I were single, I would bend her over the nearest piece of furniture in a heart beat.

She is brilliant and right on point 99% of the time.

Those NJ widows do have awfully high profiles for widows.

FunForOne 06-07-2006 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chase
Of course they will use whatever was the catalyst for their activism as a tool. That's how to turn a negative event into something positive..like the parents of kids who get hurt on unsafe baby equipment using that event as a platform to further their cause-making safe baby equipment. I know it's an apples and oranges comparison, but to expect them to sit home and do nothing when they feel so strongly about something is really unrealistic. If my son was killed in the war, and it made my voice louder than the other anti-war cryers, damn right I'd be using that to get my message across.


Perfect point. But, her arguement is that if you are going to get your message our there, you should open yourself up.

Using your example, lets say it is your opinion that you kid got hurt on the unsafe baby equipment and you cant prove it. Shouldn't the company that manufactures the baby equipment in question be able to prove their case?

pocketkangaroo 06-07-2006 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB
You are a retard. Even Fox News thinks she went too far.

I mean is this called for

"And by the way, how do we know their husbands weren't planning to divorce these harpies? Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they'd better hurry up and appear in Playboy..."

Grrr! Ann Coulter Goes Too Far

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,198597,00.html

Ehhhh, Fox will still have her on every night till eternity. When they take her off the air, I'll believe that they think she went too far.

FunForOne 06-07-2006 06:35 PM

Just think about the Cindy Shehan deal. Was she really doing all that on her own, or were organizations taking advantage of her situation to gain favorable media attention for their cause?

I think we know the answer.

Mr. Soul 06-07-2006 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Well Dunn
I dont much care for her but she makes a decent point. It's just like cindy sheehan, she used her sons death for attention and political propaganda. I feel bad for anyone who loses a loved one, but I start to lose my sympathy once I see them using that loss for their own gain.


So people who loose loved ones aren't allowed to make statements against war? Brilliant logic. Let me guess, you're some sort of NASA rocket scientist?

pocketkangaroo 06-07-2006 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FunForOne
Perfect point. But, her arguement is that if you are going to get your message our there, you should open yourself up.

Using your example, lets say it is your opinion that you kid got hurt on the unsafe baby equipment and you cant prove it. Shouldn't the company that manufactures the baby equipment in question be able to prove their case?

Then why didn't she tear into the families that are fighting for the 9/11 memorial? Aren't they doing the same thing essentially? By same thing I mean having an opinion.

Ann Coulter is a sideshow guys. She is smart, she knows how to push buttons. She'll sell millions of copies and make tons of money in speaking gigs because of this. It doesn't mean she isn't a total hypocrit and classless bitch.

ronbotx 06-07-2006 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxdesign-net
You dont seem to have a clue what inteligence is... but ofcourse, she'll always impress people dumber than her... :thumbsup

So by that theory, I guess the only one you will impress is directfiesta...

Mr. Soul 06-07-2006 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FunForOne
Just think about the Cindy Shehan deal. Was she really doing all that on her own, or were organizations taking advantage of her situation to gain favorable media attention for their cause?


http://www.america911.com/president-bush-bob-beck.jpg

FunForOne 06-07-2006 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Soul
So people who loose loved ones aren't allowed to make statements against war? Brilliant logic. Let me guess, you're some sort of NASA rocket scientist?



not the point rocket scientist.

People who loose loved ones are allowed to make statements against anything they want. But if those people make millions of dollars for years and years after the loss, they shouldn't be sheltered against debate.

These women are paid millions and marched around the country repeating a politcal agenda because they assume their loss keeps them from having to debate.

FunForOne 06-07-2006 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Soul



Whats your point? He was doing his job that day. The job you and I elected him and pay him to day. He was working for us when he took that pic. Not being paid by political hacks to further a long lost politcal agenda such as the democrat platform of the 70s that they still march up every four years to make people remember Jimmy Carter, lock boxes, and cigar molestation of interns.

pocketkangaroo 06-07-2006 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FunForOne
not the point rocket scientist.

People who loose loved ones are allowed to make statements against anything they want. But if those people make millions of dollars for years and years after the loss, they shouldn't be sheltered against debate.

These women are paid millions and marched around the country repeating a politcal agenda because they assume their loss keeps them from having to debate.

It is just hard to take the stance of a woman bitching about the widows of 9/11 victims making money when she herself makes most of her income on speeches about the victims of 9/11.

Mr. Soul 06-07-2006 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FunForOne
not the point rocket scientist.

People who loose loved ones are allowed to make statements against anything they want. But if those people make millions of dollars for years and years after the loss, they shouldn't be sheltered against debate.

These women are paid millions and marched around the country repeating a politcal agenda because they assume their loss keeps them from having to debate.


These women have made millions of dollars doing this? Bull fucking shit, but it's not shocking that a jackass who defends a hate monger like Ann Coulter makes shit up on the spot.

Insulting these women and their families the way Coulter did is nothing even close to a "debate", you useless waste of life. No one would complain if she countered their arguments with a counter argument. However because she's totally ignorant and her ideology has no base in reality she's not able to do that, so she's forced to resort to the most insulting comments she can come up with, to keep her fan base of grunting half wits happy.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123