Simpsons explicit cartoon pics... bad?
 

No, no pics in this thread, but you've probably seen them. I'm talking about the MAIN characters being depicted as having sex, which crosses at least a couple of taboo/legal lines. Is this a "bad" thing to have on a free site? Discuss.

(Note it's not my own site... I came across it and thought it would make an interesting topic)

i don't think its bad. their just fucking drawings. But not sure if its considered incest or something lol

dammit :disgust

it would be i would imagine

I often wondered that myself when I see galleries like that with for example "The Incredibles", there's the young boy and sister fucking. Sure, they're just drawings, BUT they're drawings of CP.

Here's some gallery samples that I dug up to help judge -
http://www.messycomic.com/rav153/worldsex.html
http://www.cartoonvalleu.com/carv16/worldsex.html

It's depicting underage sex and also incest. One of the gals that Slick posted has Maggie - a baby - hanging off Homer's penis. That's not bad...?

i just couldn't imagine :uhoh :uhoh :uhoh

lol!!!
copyright infrigement?!
but other that that yes its wrong as wrong as furrys

they are really good, i have seen a couple of them..

http://www.simpsoncrazy.com/gallery/...s/news_078.jpg

So you're saying you like cartoon CP?

I'd think those types of depictions would violate the ToS of almost every program out there, at least under incest and KP provisions (and probably copyright infringement as well).

I just canned about half a dozen of those sites from our program (at fpctraffic).

its all good, they are pretty funny

Nothing wrong with it IMHO.

Isnt that the point of ANIME/Hentai

uhm........ :uhoh

My first and only thoughts.

I came up with the idea of Bart pissing on a Ford logo.

>Isnt that the point of ANIME/Hentai

Nope. Hentai is a lot more than that or I wouldn't run hentai sites. All characters in our content have adult bodies. Most major sites are that way (not that ours is major). lol

My first website back in the time was featuring such Simpsons cartoon .. Guess what? Fox closed my websites :(

You and I must be looking at different Anime/Hentai.

Been around for quite sometime..although Maggie shouldn't be part of it..

It's a big field. Lollicon and that crap is only a part of it. I don't know what hentai you're looking at, but it's nothing I have or would have on my sites.

Yuppers, wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole. Pushing Lolicon from down here carries the same jail time as the real deal. Something i choose not to be assoicated with.

-N

bump....

i dont' see how this type of content isn't on the same level as CP even though it's drawn it's still depicting children performing sexual acts... disguisting...

Its fucked up when you see pics of Homer fucking Lisa. .. things like that are crazy... and yea, they exist. People laugh them off... but how dare they use Matt Groening's characters!!!

;)

Seriously... I am a toon artist and I draw the line at stuff... that's WAY below my line.

I hear cartoon CP like this is a tool that real child molesters use to lure young kids into doing sexual acts. For instance, they show them a drawing of maggie simpson sucking Homer's dick, and use it to convince the child that such an act is ok. Since the drawings look exactly like the tv show, it could really fuck with the kid's head I imagine. Same thing with dizney porn.

aren't these simpsons characters protected by copyright?

I dont think that the kids should be part of it, but with homer and marge, and maybe some of the neighbors, thats ok.

Yep, that's why it's illegal.

under the Amber Act, those type of toons are illegal, not counting just plan wrong

you better believe it

According to the US Supreme Court "simulated" CP is prefectly legal. Face it every mainstream "teen" movie that shows to supposed underaged kids fucking is simulated CP.

lol - why the fuck has that site got a 2257 page? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

"All models are 18 years old or older. USC title 18, #2257
Proof on the file with custodian of records" :1orglaugh

very interesting stuff

just goes to show some webmasters have no idea what 2 2 5 7 is all about.

the pictures sucks... the guy don't know how to draw well :S

need to see pics to make an honest assestment :thumbsup