Sorry but these girls look really young.
 

Is it that I'm old?

http://www.girls18.com/page5.html

they do look young... but as long as they are 2257 complient then:thumbsup

They look barely 16

Pretty young girls.

Young and ugly.

indeed they do... Do the content providers listed on the 2257 page look legit? I dropped a quick note to Paul Markham because I saw him listed there.

Does not load for me and I'm told that they have our content on there. Until I see the site I'm not sure, but I think they are clients of ours.

If content girls look much younger than 18, then it makes you think what kind of people the sites are targetting. I feel uncomfortable even knowing that they are over 18.

shit, the link doesn't work for me!

Bought one set of a girl who is clearly not that young looking. But only one set.

It's a pretty big operation Paul, I don't see any of your work there, but you are listed. Just try www.girls18.com

first of all they dont look that young, second i dont see any nudity

Seen the site and these girls look under age. Best thing to do is shoot off an email to the billing company and hosting company. Get them to check the models documents.

they really looks too young.

why would you post that link here?
you should contact hosting and billing companies if you care that much

don't look too young to me, just short with small tits and flat booties

oh segpay

well that says it all doesnt it

i didnt want to be the one to say it..lol

yeah some of those girls look 15, but it says 2257 compliant and thats what is important i guess

same here.. I know a few 21 years old in real life looking younger.. my sister in-law looks younger than that at 22 :upsidedow

wtf this site is ashley lightspeed http://www.katy18.com/ i wonder if Steve knows that they are stealing his content.

That girl has done shoots with other companies before lightspeed... I've bought a few of her sets through focus adult. I'm pretty sure Paul Markham has shot her too, but not positive on that.

I have just spoken to sweetums on ICQ who advised me that she has done other shoots with other sites. My apologies.

True dat

:thumbsup

haha this is classic. You find a site that you think may have underage models, and you post a direct link on a message board asking for opinions. If you actualy gave a shit you would have reported it. You are just trying to start drama.

It´s not my cup of tea.

I said "looked really young", not underage. Secondly it has names of people I work with and are board members. Thirdly I don't plug in this board so I need no drama, just helping our community. We sometimes need to fix it if it's broken. I will not report a site until I have feed back for I may be wrong, but as you can see it is a mixed bag here.

They do look yound but if they are compliant with the legislation then nothing much you or anyone can do.

you are not old, you are matured ;)
girls look young but i think they are not. I am 27 and people give me maximum 20.

They look way too young...

Some look young some don't

These girls do look young, but I know a couple girls, one who is 21 who looks like she is 15. Short skinny, flat chested girl with a baby face. She wont do pictures or video... i asked. :(

i wouldn't push a site if the girl clearly didn't LOOK 18, thats just pedo fishing right there

:thumbsup :thumbsup

They look a tad on the young side to me..

seems like you always think about business.

same here. Too bad there are many webmasters that don't see it that way or just don't care...

I like WOMEN. Girls are for kids.

they look too young, that's true

its all that non nude stuff... that clan freaks me out.
i call them psuedofiles.

lol
duke