GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   How many webmasters prefer a good rev share program? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=580012)

RRRED 02-24-2006 03:38 PM

How many webmasters prefer a good rev share program?
 
It's always such an issue when you're talking to a webmaster about a program. Everyone has to do PPS and make the quick buck. Is this because most members areas are total garbage these days and that's the only way the webmaster can make good money?

I dunno. I'm starting to change my way of thinking these days and I notice that some others are starting to do the same.

Anyone else starting to worry more about their bottom line over the quick buck?

Peaches 02-24-2006 03:41 PM

Personally it's always depended on the sites. For one of the big huge corporate sites that basically all have the same backend, I like PPS. For smaller single girl sites, where the girls update the sites frequently and build up a good and long term fanbase, I like revshare.

modF 02-24-2006 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches
Personally it's always depended on the sites. For one of the big huge corporate sites that basically all have the same backend, I like PPS. For smaller single girl sites, where the girls update the sites frequently and build up a good and long term fanbase, I like revshare.

I dont' think I could have said it any better.

chase 02-24-2006 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches
Personally it's always depended on the sites. For one of the big huge corporate sites that basically all have the same backend, I like PPS. For smaller single girl sites, where the girls update the sites frequently and build up a good and long term fanbase, I like revshare.

What she said. :)

sonofsam 02-24-2006 03:44 PM

completely depends on the site

sites like karups or naughty america - revshare all the way

sites like errr.. i'll just leave them nameless... PPS

most sponsors should give you a pass to check out the members area, and then you can decide on that

also check your icq :)

Nookster 02-24-2006 03:46 PM

Me me me!! I love revshare programs. For example, methodcash is making me some damn good greenbacks as of late. If I were slanging the single sales I wouldn't have made dick so far this period. :2 cents:

WiredGuy 02-24-2006 03:57 PM

PPS is the only model that can be assessed for my business model. When you're doing media buys of this scale, I'm not waiting 4-5 months to realize capital gains (or losses). I need to know with 7-10 days maximum if I should continue or cut the campaign.
WG

axelcat 02-24-2006 04:01 PM

revshare has worked the best for me through the years

RRRED 02-24-2006 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonofsam
completely depends on the site

sites like karups or naughty america - revshare all the way

sites like errr.. i'll just leave them nameless... PPS

most sponsors should give you a pass to check out the members area, and then you can decide on that

also check your icq :)


Hahaha you posted that before we talked?

sonofsam 02-24-2006 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RRRED
Hahaha you posted that before we talked?

yah, way before we talked :thumbsup

adultchica 02-24-2006 04:08 PM

Only a few programs have revshare that is worth the wait over pps

Theo 02-24-2006 04:27 PM

I don't have any ratio, but I can tell you we don't have problem without offering a PPS to get affiliates that do know their traffic and can put numbers down and remain on our program.

Up to 2003 by offering a PPS program you could pretty much guarantee your survival. We arrived at the current status after the massive exodus of failed webmasters from the industry and the radical increase of affiliate programs from those that manage to save ten bucks.

Suprise surpise all these bright minds come up with deceiving PPS programs. Have a look at the traffic they receive and you'll start questioning yourself if they have a 2nd job for living. Request access to their paysites and you'll see a cemetery of blowout dvd offers purchased for 90 bucks each.

TheSaint 02-24-2006 06:44 PM

I'll take 3rd party revshare everytime.

PR_Dave 02-24-2006 06:46 PM

See sig.

Good PPS programs, good revshare programs too.

:pimp

jayeff 02-24-2006 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RRRED
Anyone else starting to worry more about their bottom line over the quick buck?

You are implying that revshare automatically means a better bottom line, when in fact many new site owners protect themselves with revshare without having a clue whether their sites will retain. I have also suspected a few programs over the last couple of years of effectively reducing their payouts by offering revshare payouts on sites designed to work according to PPS principles: in other words sites the owners know will not retain because they are not intended to.

I approach both payout methods with equal caution, but always hoping I can find good revshare programs. The first reason is that contrary to what most of us appear to think, surfers are a mix of ordinary people, no more stupid than the population (of which we are part) at large. Which means that a good revshare program will inevitably be more honest with its members and come a lot closer to providing what they are looking for.

That gives me a lot more confidence and helps me feel better about selling the sites concerned. It gives me at least the possibility that having satisfied someone once, he just might come back to me when he wants something new. More importantly I have generally found the operators of good revshare programs to be a lot, lot better and easier to work with and I suspect (or at least hope) that since they are honest with their customers, a higher proportion are also honest with their affiliates.

Last but of course not least, any recurring site which retains for 3+ months on average is likely to produce more income for me than the majority of PPS programs. Unfortunately, there just aren't enough of them...

DamageX 02-24-2006 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayeff
You are implying that revshare automatically means a better bottom line, when in fact many new site owners protect themselves with revshare without having a clue whether their sites will retain. I have also suspected a few programs over the last couple of years of effectively reducing their payouts by offering revshare payouts on sites designed to work according to PPS principles: in other words sites the owners know will not retain because they are not intended to.

I approach both payout methods with equal caution, but always hoping I can find good revshare programs. The first reason is that contrary to what most of us appear to think, surfers are a mix of ordinary people, no more stupid than the population (of which we are part) at large. Which means that a good revshare program will inevitably be more honest with its members and come a lot closer to providing what they are looking for.

That gives me a lot more confidence and helps me feel better about selling the sites concerned. It gives me at least the possibility that having satisfied someone once, he just might come back to me when he wants something new. More importantly I have generally found the operators of good revshare programs to be a lot, lot better and easier to work with and I suspect (or at least hope) that since they are honest with their customers, a higher proportion are also honest with their affiliates.

And then there are the Perfection Jeffs of the business...

jayeff 02-24-2006 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamageX
And then there are the Perfection Jeffs of the business...

:Graucho

Paparazzi 02-24-2006 08:19 PM

why accept $35/signup when you can make $55-60 average with revshare :)

Wiggles 02-24-2006 08:22 PM

depends if the site can actually retain, fetish tends to retain well, also solo girls when you find the obsessed freaks.

woj 02-24-2006 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paparazzi
why accept $35/signup when you can make $55-60 average with revshare :)

you wish... I dare you to post some stats showing you average that much per member....

Juilan 02-24-2006 10:21 PM

For me it depends on the traffic source. Some traffic rebills liek mad while other sources will signup for 1 month only and then ditch. So if you have a known traffic source and send 1/2 to pps and 1/2 to pct for a qtr. and then compare... at least thats what i do when i'm sober....

Thomas N 02-24-2006 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paparazzi
why accept $35/signup when you can make $55-60 average with revshare :)

I'm not greedy, I'll take the $35 per signup and you can keep all that extra cash for yourself.

Blizzard 02-24-2006 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WiredGuy
PPS is the only model that can be assessed for my business model. When you're doing media buys of this scale, I'm not waiting 4-5 months to realize capital gains (or losses). I need to know with 7-10 days maximum if I should continue or cut the campaign.
WG

What he said. Also if you're a mailer/dirty spammer you'll always prefer PPS.

EOF.

xclusive 02-24-2006 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches
Personally it's always depended on the sites. For one of the big huge corporate sites that basically all have the same backend, I like PPS. For smaller single girl sites, where the girls update the sites frequently and build up a good and long term fanbase, I like revshare.

Damn, I agree with Peaches, Shoot me now:) j/k:)

Cash 02-25-2006 12:02 AM

It's so frustrating to see all those cancels and think of actual losses, that it's hard to wait for months to see if rebills, esp. those of people who rebil even after 1 year, turn into better profit than the initial PPS earnings ... So PPS for me.

SomeCreep 02-25-2006 12:32 AM

All the professional webmasters I know, promote a mix of both PPS and revshare programs.

studiocritic 02-25-2006 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WiredGuy
PPS is the only model that can be assessed for my business model. When you're doing media buys of this scale, I'm not waiting 4-5 months to realize capital gains (or losses). I need to know with 7-10 days maximum if I should continue or cut the campaign.
WG

WG spoke for all of us that do PPC. :thumbsup

WiredGuy 02-25-2006 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by studiocritic
WG spoke for all of us that do PPC. :thumbsup

I can tell who are the media buyers in this thread, hehe.
WG

bdld 02-25-2006 01:20 AM

At this point the only revshare program I promote is hahaha, everything else is PPS.

StatsJunky 02-25-2006 02:18 AM

PPS pretty much all the way for me. I won't turn down a good site that has revshare but would prefer PPS over that anyday.

Pretty much the only program that has performed well with revhsare only was BlacksOnBlondes. I promoted them heavily back in 2000 up to late 2001. And I still get decent size checks every week to this day. No idea how the perform now... but they in my experience, where an extreme case of revshare performing better.

Morgan 02-25-2006 02:21 AM

Ive made most of my money with revshare.

NickB. 02-25-2006 02:26 AM

owwww yeah Rev Share is baaaaaaaaaaaack!
Thanks for the kind words bdld, You ROCK !!!!!

bigdog 04-02-2006 07:36 AM

i am greedy want my money upfront even if it's $20 a join

Pornopat 04-02-2006 09:29 AM

If you think pps pays more money then revshare you will have to follow that line of thinking and make other conclusions about the program as well...
:2 cents:

Quick Buck 04-02-2006 09:52 AM

I prefer sending to PPS programs. It's not so much a question of whether over the course of 18 months whether you'll make more with revshare than PPS... you might make a *bit* more with revshare if the site is very niched and has an amazing amount of content and frequent updates (such as single girl sites)....

My bottom line for choosng PPS is that I remember companies like "busty amateurs"... who shut down owing millions to their partners. If you choose revshare, you're not just betting on the members area and billing options, but the viability of the company too.

Not to be a nay sayer, but what happens if they lose a merchant account or get sued or if their biller goes under etc..etc..etc... i prefer to just get my money now.. as Rrred said...

I prefer the quick buck :)

SomeCreep 04-02-2006 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RRRED
It's always such an issue when you're talking to a webmaster about a program. Everyone has to do PPS and make the quick buck. Is this because most members areas are total garbage these days and that's the only way the webmaster can make good money?

I dunno. I'm starting to change my way of thinking these days and I notice that some others are starting to do the same.

Anyone else starting to worry more about their bottom line over the quick buck?

I prefer promoting a mix of pps and revshare sponsors. The problem with some revshare sponsors is that they dont update new content, rather they rotate the content they already have.

PPS is always the safe bet though for affiliates, which is probably why most affiliates prefer PPS.

I have some revshare sponsors where I average $8/sale, others where I average $45+/sale. Experience is golden.

Designed Perfection 04-02-2006 10:36 AM

i do lol

andrej_NDC 04-02-2006 02:29 PM

I prefer revshare since that makes me twice as many sales on the same traffic(same sponsor). I wonder why.

MichaelP 04-02-2006 02:33 PM

I do think it depends on one particular traffic and the site type where he send these surfers....

I think the best is to try both with the same traffic, when you can, and see which one is better for you :2 cents:

Theo 04-02-2006 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigdog
i am greedy want my money upfront even if it's $20 a join


greedy is not leaving anything on table, not taking less lol


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123