The Most Controversial Documentary About 9/11 Airs On Australian Tv Network
 

THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL DOCUMENTARY ABOUT 9/11 AIRS ON AUSTRALIAN TV NETWORK

January 5, 2006
Contact: Dave vonKleist 573-378-6049

?911 - In Plane Site,? the most controversial video documentary ever produced about 9/11, aired on Australia?s ?TEN? television network Wednesday evening. For one and a half hours, hundreds of thousands of Australians were mesmerized and shocked by images of the 9/11 attacks that to this day had never been seen by the public. It is reported that the network has received more response from the airing of ?911 In Plane Site? than in recent history.? www.911inplanesite.com

Network executives are scrambling to meet the demands of callers that jammed the phone lines and requested a re-airing of the documentary. According to a network programming spokesperson, the overwhelming majority of calls were positive and viewers thanked the network for airing the program.

E-mails poured into the producers of ?911 In Plane Site? on Wednesday expressing support and thanks for the production as well as sadness, fear and anger as a result of the cover-up of the information contained in the video.

Despite efforts to suppress the information and questions raised in ?911 ? In Plane Site,? an increasing number of military experts and commercial airline pilots are coming forward to support and validate the information contained in the documentary. Many are now calling for a re-opening of the investigation into the September 11th attacks.

Dave vonKleist, producer and co-host of ?The Power Hour? radio program (www.thepowerhour.com) stated: ?The American people and the people of the world deserve the truth. Every country has been dramatically affected by 9/11 and the evidence indicates that we all have been lied to by government and media officials. Justice must be served and the real terrorists must be exposed and prosecuted.?

The Power Hour
www.thepowerhour.com
Joyce Riley & Dave vonKleist

dont they have the internet there ?

Most third world countries don't have the interweb. Australia is no exception.

oly one problem...they say that many are calling for the reopening of the investigation...


ummm yeah....I DONT THINK SO! they will never allow this

I'll bet the Aussie stores can't keep the tinfoil hats in stock.

Can the conspiracy theorists account for the people who died on flight 77 and the remains found and identified at the pentagon site?

When they do - could they please forward the information to the families of the people that died.

Thank you.

I got that video on my harddrive....very interesting indeed

Heard all this before, well before this show was made. And I live in Oz :winkwink:

Do you honestly believe that anything from Flight 77 have been found here in this rabbit hole?

http://www.wilsonsalmanac.com/images...agon_hole2.jpg

The video is on TorrentSpy for those interested. I'm going to download it later and see what they have to say.

People honestly think this was a missle, or a rocket or.. what?

watch the video for some answers... or actually for more questions...

Heavy Sigh

there are mos def some convinceing arguements in the video,but i dont think this case will ever re open..

Maybe it was a planeload of midgets. :1orglaugh

Where the can I get the video??

Where to get the video?
http://www.mininova.org/tor/34449
There are more torrents of the movie at mininova.org
You need bittorrent to download it.

August 13, 2004

From: NewsWithViews.com

A new 9-11 video was screened last night in Sacramento, California, leaving the audience stunned. '911 in Plane Site' is basically presented in two parts. The first segment is 52 minutes and designed for showing on television with the balance of a one hour time slot reserved for commercials. Part II continues with more film and analysis. This video is digitally mastered making details sharp and clear.

'911 in Plane Site' presents actual film from that fateful day and careful analysis focusing on the Pentagon and the two World Trade Center buildings. By slowing down the actual news feeds that day from networks like CNN, FOX, the BBC and others, what you see is quite different from what most people saw in "real time" that day. Live footage from the Pentagon and what was missed by most because of the smoke and confusion was captured up close by the media. Following the showing, a retired vet remarked, "How did we miss this all this time? I've seen media clips of the front of that building [the Pentagon] many times, but I wasn't really seeing what was there. I feel sick."

One particular interview that brought gasps from the audience and many looking around with shock etched on their faces was an interview conducted - live at the time - by FOX News. This intense interview with Mark Burnback, an employee of FOX News, contains the following narrative, paraphrased: Burnback was close to the path of the second plane and had a good long look at what he describes was not a commercial airliner. The plane that hit the second tower had no windows, Burnback was very clear about that. The plane had some kind of blue logo on the front near the nose and looked like a cargo plane. This point was driven to the viewer several times along with the comment from this FOX employee that "this plane wasn't from around here or anything you'd see take off from the airport."

Other footage includes several women who had a very clear view watching the second plane hit were yelling, "That wasn't American Airlines....It wasn't American Airlines going into the building." These interviews were played that morning once on FOX News, never to be replayed again, despite the massive saturation and repetition by the media for many days to come.

Other extremely disturbing segments of this video are the clear, slow motion shots of the second plane going into the towers which show a flash right before the nose of the plane hits the building and a pod attached to the bottom of the plane. This strange flash is clearly recorded from four different angles from four different cameras. While there is only one known piece of film showing the first plane hitting the first tower, in slow motion one can clearly see - as with the second plane - a flash from the nose section right before impact. What caused this?

This video raises extremely disturbing questions about the planes that hit the Pentagon and the World Trade Centers, but no conclusions or accusations are made by the commentator. To date, only one piece of film has been released by DoD of the front of the Pentagon. The question raised in the video is where is all the other film footage from the Pentagon? The heart beat of America's military and security, with a building and perimeter loaded with cameras, but no film for the public to view of events as they unfolded except from one camera?

According to the producers, the purpose of '911 in Plane Site' is to demonstrate that Americans saw one thing that morning that was so shocking, so horrific and so massive, the finer details weren't really being picked up. The producer reinforces to the viewer that after one broadcast of many very controversial interviews live on the spot, these particular interviews were never broadcast again, i.e. firefighters on the spot talking about the explosions and bombs inside the towers. Since 9-11, it has been reported that "Building Seven" collapsed because of the two World Trade Center towers collapsing. However, the footage on this video tells a different story and raises more questions.

'911 in Plane Site,' distributed by Power Hour Productions (866-773-9469), leaves one with many questions as demonstrated by a very upset senior citizen who requested her last name be withheld. Mary asked, "If these weren't commercial airliners, where are those flights? Where are the passengers? My, God what really happened that day?" Indeed, this seemed to be the biggest question expressed by viewers after the lights came back on, but for which there were no answers. Some viewers were visibly upset, angry and "want damn answers" from the Bush Administration. Others just walked out the door in silence. One upset man commented on the way out of the viewing, "It's time to get this on PBS and every investigative news program on TV. We need answers."

More drivel from Mr. bullsht..... :Oh crap

If you want to want something with some semblance of fact, and be entertained at the same time, try this new movie from A&E , "Flight 93"

A true story of some real heroes..... :thumbsup

http://www.aetv.com/flight_93/

downloading it

Scientists have modeled the plane hitting such a hard object like that would flow like a liquid into the building.


This accounts for why the damage was severe inside, and relatively little on the outside. The speed and path of the plane literally sucked itself inside of the Pentagon.


Who would you trust more, some theorists, or some scientists who modeled the crash based on physics?

Hello Mr. Brainwashed... now that you mentioned A&E be sure to watch Criss Angel's Mindfreak show... one of the greatest americans on TV... but you wouldn't understand him anyway...

I'd like to see it

The same scientists that wrote the biggest joke - 9-11 Commission report or some other "scientists" paid by the Bush gang?

Never even knew it was on or saw any ads for it. Channel ten too.. weird, thats strictly SBS stuff.

Irony:

You are quick to point out a finanicially motivated cover up in the arguement for a movie promoting a wild conspiracy that is making a ton of money.

Michael Moore already stole many kids money, these guys just want their share.

I'm surprised you even have electricity - how are the Amish coming along in Penn anyways? heheh :)

Hmm.. yeah, I thought that when a plane crashes into a building, it's supposed to leave a plane-shaped hole in the wall. I mean that's the way it works in the cartoons... shouldn't that happen in real life too? I'm sure there are people out there who have seen their fair share of planes crashing into walls who can back me up on this.

hey, i've had dialup for at least 6 months now!

When does Australia get the video of how we fake the moon landing? Oh and the cool alien autopsy thing?

Yeah right... The whole world deserves to know the truth behind the 9-11 attack. The good Mr. President and his company have mistakenly used that 9-11 attack to justify his so-called "war on terrorism".

Reminds me of Fahrenheit 9/11 documentary.

I believe several University Physicists produced similar results in computer modelling of the accident. The airplane flowed like a liquid into the building and spread out within the building.

Australia isn't a 3rd world country you fucking retard


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...Firstworld.png
It's a first world country, just like the country you live in...

Id like to put your sorry ass in a locked room with the families of the people who died on that plane.

Yeah, how'd the bodies get in there if it wasn't a plane?


If SOMEONE moved the bodies there, let's assume that for ONE moment.


Don't you think SOMEONE would've come forward with some evidence?


Someone who killed the passengers via a gas

Someone who transported them in vehicles, with luggage

Someone who planted the bodies

Someone who chopped them up

etc, etc, etc, etc, etc

Were there any remains recovered at the Pentagon of passangers?

If not... I don't doubt that people came up missing, but the possibility exists that something else happened to the actual plane than crashing into the Pentagon.

Look you ignorant child.... who is CONSISTENTLY WRONG about everything. You don't know jack shit and your record on this board proves it. Pay attention to your own country of Bulgaria and stop your moronic commentary about a country you have never even visited.

And by the way retard, I saw the second plane fly into 2nd tower on LIVE television.. unless the Networks are helping Bush with his "conspiracy"

Questioning the truth doesn't hurt the families one bit, it's actually a sign of intelligence.