British man recovers from HIV
 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4432564.stm

seems like bs to me

Get a copy of the documentary
HIV fact or fiction.

It will change your world about what you think of this disease.

thanks,ill check it out today

definately bs

seems like real good news for the guy anyway

Bush should liberate him and dice him up and find a cure

"we offered him further tests to help us investigate and find an explanation for the different results.

"So far Mr Stimpson has declined this offer." "


hmmmm BS

It sounds unbelievable would be nice if its true though

the he drink tea?

bs just got low levels

Thats the lamest excuse for reporting I have ever seen, absolutely no facts are given, theres nothing about which tests were used etc. The statement that he required no medication is BS as soon as a western blot confirms you are positive you are put on medication...

Thats just BS at this point

That whole country looks like its got HIV

I would think that one of the tests was incorrect. And if I had been told that I beat the disease, I wouldn't want another test either. What if the next test told me that I had HIV? Talk about a mind fuck.

Okay..here is part of the reason I question him - If you were the first person in the world to be cured of HIV for real "The News Of The World" would not be the paper breaking the story.

please explain?

There is a part of Africa where the prostitutes seem to be imune to HIV. They have sex bareback many times a day.

It has been written up many times, including the Toronto Globe and Mail.

There is a lot about HIV that we do not know. But the money is in the treatments, not the cure or the vaccine to prevent it.

My guess is that this fucker mixed up the blood samples or something like that

If there can be false-negatives for the test, why not false postives?

uhhh...that's why they use words like "anecdotal", "claims", "unable to confirm"

They're simply reporting the story of what that guy "claims" to be true, they didn't report that it was true.

It could be true. I have read some of the theories that say that the releife coctail of drugs is what is killing these people.

I personally know 3 guys that died from it, but I dont know any of the background how after they contracted it.

Great news... if that's true...

How will it do that?

Stick to subjects you have a clue about.........

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Prostitutes lose HIV immunity


The prostitutes come from Kenya

A group of prostitutes thought to be immune to HIV have now become infected, causing dismay to scientists hoping to develop an Aids vaccine.
It was thought that exposure to HIV on a regular basis created immunity, but six Kenyan women previously thought to be resistant are now HIV-positive.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/619316.stm

And on that note... I'm off to Africa without a rubber in my pocket. :thumbsup

see above about too posts. reconsider.

As fast as I could reply, you spoiled my trip. :321GFY

I wonder how they were about to hold it off for so long before becoming HIV+?

According to the article. The girls have to maintain constant exposure to the virus in order to maintain immunity. As soon as they stopped exposing themselves to the virus....it moved in and took over.

that's bullshit

So to avoid infection, stay in contact with virus. To contract infection, stay away from virus.

Am I the only one really confused?

I watched and all I can say WOW, even did further research on the web where experienced professors claim the exact same thing with documented studies that......

HIV is not the cause of AIDS, even yet it may not even exists.

Guys, get a copy from that documentary from edonkey and it will shock your world. I'm sure you may find things to question on it, but it will become so clear we haven't been told the truth since the start.

Holy fucking shit!!! Someone on GFY actually took my advice!

But having watched it you see exactly what I'm seeing. The fact that there is even a controversy about this disease points to there is more going on than meets the eye.

The simple fact that stands out in my mind is the basic stats of it. If HIV was a "new" disease. We would have a greater number of people contracting the disease than currently is.

All standard and accepted evidence points to that HIV has been around for centuries.

noways, it cant be true!

exactly metroporntour and you won't believe how many thousand researchers support the same and nobdy gives them a stand to talk. No wonder we barely hear anying about all these billions for studies.

good reading

http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/index/epapadopoulos.htm

this one is even better

http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/data/cjinterviewep.htm

"If there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents which either singly or collectively demonstrate that fact, at least with a high probability. There is no such document."

Dr. Kary Mullis, Biochemist, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry.

"Up to today there is actually no single scientifically really convincing evidence for the existence of HIV. Not even once such a retrovirus has been isolated and purified by the methods of classical virology."

Dr. Heinz Ludwig Sänger, Emeritus Professor of Molecular Biology and Virology, Max-Planck-Institutes for Biochemy, München.

if you are quick, you can do it

thats my country your talking about mr


fuck you, you puta

your momma cleans horse cock & balls

That would be a good news to all fellas who have STD.