Premium High Bandwidth Sever w/Linux RedHat ES
 

Server Specifications:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Premium Intel-based Server
Intel 3.06GHz Xeon
3 GB RAM - Memory Registered ECC Kingston
4 x 146 GB SCSI - Disk Storage (Ultra320 SCSI 15K RPM)
Raid 10 plus 1x 146 hot stand by
Bandwidth ? Tier-1 NTT/Verio Network
Dedicated 100Mbits Full Duplex Port
8 Dedicated IP Addresses
OS ? Linux Red Hat ES

Test Our Network -
Down loadable test files http://198.104.150.245/e5test.htm
Down loadable test files http://198.104.150.45/e5test.htm

We could put this server on a 50Mbps 75Mbps or 100Mbps plan

Contact me with your bandwidth requirements and I will work you a deal.

Regards,

Anthony
ad @ e5hosting.com
ICQ: 313615022

how much for 20mbs ? :)

sandman!,

Do to expensive hardware on this server the smallest bandwidth plan we could offer on this unit on is a 50Mbps solution. But I could offer you a good deal on 25Mbps server 2 x 300 HD with raid 0 or 1.

Anthony

Bump...Bump

:) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)

why dont you post your prices here? let's see


1mbps
2mbps
5mbps
10mbps
20mbps

dude does nothing but spam all fucking day long :error

indeed :disgust

then give me the 50mbs price silly :)

I'm not impressed

waasdor7@xs2:~% wget http://198.104.150.245/testfiles/10MB.txt
--20:20:39-- http://198.104.150.245/testfiles/10MB.txt
=> `10MB.txt'
Connecting to 198.104.150.245:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 10,485,760 [text/plain]


20:21:34 (186.62 KB/s) - `10MB.txt' saved [10485760/10485760]

waasdor7@xs2:~% rm -f 10MB.txt
waasdor7@xs2:~% wget http://198.104.150.45/testfiles/10MB.txt
--20:22:26-- http://198.104.150.45/testfiles/10MB.txt
=> `10MB.txt'
Connecting to 198.104.150.45:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 10,485,760 [text/plain]

10,485,760 181.55K/s ETA 00:00

20:23:23 (181.55 KB/s) - `10MB.txt' saved [10485760/10485760]

Test was done from KPN/XS4ALL network Amsterdam

come on, dickweed, let's see your best prices!

Test from Savvis DC in Dallas.

$ wget http://198.104.150.45/testfiles/10MB.txt

[..]

07:36:24 (705.48 KB/s) - `10MB.txt.1' saved [10485760/10485760]

Why does everyone jump on a new guy just trying to make money in the business? Anthony's hosting is actually very good. And the service you receive is EVEN better!

Some of you guys would do well to give them a shot.

Good any other US hosting companies that have a test file...? I'll download it
from the same machine....and post the results

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I'm not jumping on him....I agreed that he's spamming a lot.....I posted results
on the test files from a network in Amsterdam.....what's your point? Based
on the results (I actually did that test now 3x/day and for 2 days) I won't
try him out.......

$1950.00 per month

Could you post some files on your server so we could compare?

yeah sure http://www.xs4all.nl/~waasdor7/test.html

http://www.pdghosting.com/speed/C316B3CEd01


19.73 megs

Webair

Could you post some files on your server so we could compare?

:pimp

waasdor7@xs2:~/WWW% wget http://www.pdghosting.com/speed/C316B3CEd01
--21:02:48-- http://www.pdghosting.com/speed/C316B3CEd01
=> `C316B3CEd01'
Resolving www.pdghosting.com... done.
Connecting to www.pdghosting.com[65.98.84.218]:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 20,691,006 [text/plain]

20,691,006 610.31K/s ETA 00:00

21:03:22 (610.31 KB/s) - `C316B3CEd01' saved [20691006/20691006]

a LOT better :thumbsup

I wouldn't laugh if I were you.
Your customers come on gfy for support!

which is more pathetic ?

directfiesta,

To keep this fare can we use the same file?

(75MB Test File protrial.exe)

http://198.104.150.245/e5test.htm

I'm downloading that file now....will post result and add it to the test.html
in the link that I posted as soon as it has completed downloading

its pretty slow dude,
sorry about it but I'd work on it first.
I get only 400K/s from an ev1 servers, wth!
I get well over 1Mbps from other providers!

Are you testing with a shell account?

waasdor7@xs2:~/WWW% wget http://198.104.150.245/testfiles/protrial.exe
--21:10:46-- http://198.104.150.245/testfiles/protrial.exe
=> `protrial.exe'
Connecting to 198.104.150.245:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 80,266,240 [application/octet-stream]

80,266,240 173.31K/s ETA 00:00

21:18:18 (173.31 KB/s) - `protrial.exe' saved [80266240/80266240]


http://www.xs4all.nl/~waasdor7/test.html protrial.exe is added....have fun :winkwink:

Yes I do

Yes I do....does that matter to you? I test all files posted here from the same machine

no, I own the fucking server, wth!
you have speed problems, admit that and go fix it.

if it does.....I'm going to do the same test from a server owned by me...
hooked to UUNet NL

sit back and wait for the results

Connecting to 198.104.150.245:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 10,485,760 [text/plain]

100%[hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha>] 10,485,760 801.19K/s ETA 00:00

15:26:25 (801.19 KB/s) - `10MB.txt' saved [10485760/10485760]

tested from 3 different datacenters in US.
speeds from 100Kb/s to 400Kb/s
Considering this is server to server transfer its way too slow.

Sure... I am downloading it now, then will upload ( slow upload , I am home now ).

PS: your download is VERY slow ( under 100 kb/s ) :(

21:33:59 (132.29 KB/s) - `protrial.exe' saved [80266240/80266240]

This was downloaded from my own server hosted at the UUnet datacenter
in Amsterdam....server is on a STM-4/OC12 pipe.....

it seems you have poor peering agreements

waasdor7@xs2:~/WWW% traceroute 198.104.150.245
traceroute to 198.104.150.245 (198.104.150.245), 64 hops max, 44 byte packets
1 124.ae0.xr1.d12.xs4all.net (194.109.21.1) 0.425 ms 0.903 ms 0.685 ms
2 0.so-6-0-0.xr1.sara.xs4all.net (194.109.5.2) 0.524 ms 0.604 ms 0.694 ms
3 acr2-ge-3-1-0.Amsterdamamx.savvis.net (208.174.49.133) 1.549 ms 0.625 ms 0.554 ms
4 bcs2-so-1-2-0.Parisprx.savvis.net (204.70.193.150) 10.641 ms 10.627 ms 10.824 ms
5 bcs2-so-3-0-0.Washington.savvis.net (204.70.192.125) 89.927 ms 86.706 ms 86.683 ms
6 bcs1-so-7-0-0.Washington.savvis.net (204.70.192.33) 90.362 ms 90.504 ms 90.527 ms
7 bcs1-so-4-2-0.NewYork.savvis.net (204.70.192.14) 94.517 ms 94.480 ms 94.435 ms
8 dcr3-so-1-0-0.NewYork.savvis.net (204.70.192.193) 86.396 ms dcr3-so-0-0-0.NewYork.savvis.net (204.70.192.185) 94.378 ms dcr3-so-1-0-0.NewYork.savvis.net (204.70.192.193) 86.530 ms
9 p4-2-1-0.r04.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.9.77) 86.841 ms 94.497 ms p4-3-2-0.r04.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.9.49) 95.041 ms
10 p16-1-1-0.r20.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.2.36) 94.759 ms 94.675 ms 86.735 ms
11 p16-7-0-0.r02.stngva01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.2.167) 97.775 ms 96.761 ms 96.913 ms
12 mg-2.c00.stngva01.us.da.verio.net (129.250.26.202) 97.394 ms 96.291 ms 96.408 ms
13 161.58.157.117 (161.58.157.117) 106.007 ms 108.268 ms 108.998 ms
14 198.104.150.245 (198.104.150.245) 107.852 ms 109.730 ms 108.689 ms

that's the traceroute from the shell account

traceroute to 198.104.150.245 (198.104.150.245), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 HOSTED-BY.VIRTUALXS.COM (62.129.133.126) 1.087 ms 0.259 ms 0.189 ms
2 pos1-0.gsr02.virtualxs.net (62.129.128.2) 0.962 ms 0.866 ms 0.975 ms
3 t2a1-p9-0.nl-ams2.eu.bt.net (166.49.210.1) 0.996 ms 1.091 ms 0.877 ms
4 t2a4-ge7-1.nl-ams2.eu.bt.net (166.49.200.116) 1.416 ms 1.075 ms 1.122 ms
5 r01.amstnl02.nl.bb.verio.net (195.69.144.36) 1.371 ms 1.661 ms 2.027 ms
6 p16-0-3-3.r21.asbnva01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.5.87) 93.197 ms 96.560 ms 93.043 ms
7 p64-0-0-0.r20.asbnva01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.4.118) 89.503 ms 91.791 ms 89.793 ms
8 mg-1.c00.stngva01.us.da.verio.net (129.250.28.202) 89.458 ms 89.658 ms 89.687 ms
9 161.58.157.117 (161.58.157.117) 93.071 ms 97.080 ms 97.160 ms
10 198.104.150.245 (198.104.150.245) 93.002 ms 102.279 ms 96.691 ms

This is from the other server

I'm testing from a server that has a 1000mbit uplink. The best I can get on one transfer is 900KB/sec (About 7.2 Mbits). If I run 13 transfers, I get about 40-50 Mbits. Earlier today I downloaded a file from akamai's download servers at 210Mbits/sec. When I was trying to diagnose the cause of the slow speeds, I ran a few tests, which all seem to indicate that the link to your router (161.58.157.117) is a Fast-E. Traceroute seems to show the congestion at this point as well.


6 p16-1-1-0.r20.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.2.36) 1.428 ms 1.471 ms 1.196 ms
7 p16-7-0-0.r02.stngva01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.2.167) 7.722 ms 7.762 ms 7.717 ms
8 mg-2.c00.stngva01.us.da.verio.net (129.250.26.202) 7.434 ms 7.380 ms 7.315 ms
9 161.58.157.117 (161.58.157.117) 17.898 ms 19.778 ms 20.849 ms
10 198.104.150.245 (198.104.150.245) 20.301 ms 20.979 ms 21.259 ms

Note the increase in latency between hops 8 and 9, this indicates this as a point of congestion


After I stopped running the download test, I ran another traceroute:
6 p16-1-1-0.r20.nycmny01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.2.36) 53.880 ms 1.367 ms 1.712 ms
7 p16-7-0-0.r02.stngva01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.2.167) 7.817 ms 7.744 ms 7.715 ms
8 mg-2.c00.stngva01.us.da.verio.net (129.250.26.202) 7.389 ms 7.477 ms 9.352 ms
9 161.58.157.117 (161.58.157.117) 8.234 ms 9.319 ms 9.460 ms
10 198.104.150.245 (198.104.150.245) 8.810 ms 9.412 ms 8.830 ms


You have a fast-e to Verio in Sterling Virginia, you're either doing nothing with a cap of 50 Mbits, or you're doing 50 MBits with a cap of 100. What, exactly, are you trying to show off with your speeds?