GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   America treats it's prisoners like SHIT! [PROOF] (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=482916)

dropped9 06-20-2005 09:18 AM

America treats it's prisoners like SHIT! [PROOF]
 
You fucking idiots. You thought this thread was about something else eh?

Well check... We treat our prisoners so fucking bad that we give them everything they need and more....

"For a time his favorite food was Cheetos, and when those ran out, Saddam would ?get grumpy,? the story says. One day the guards substituted Doritos corn chips, and Saddam forgot about Cheetos. ?He?d eat a family size bag of Doritos in 10 minutes,? Dawson says."


from

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8288955/


Meanwhile this man is responsible for the murders of countless ppl... He should be shot.

sonofsam 06-20-2005 09:40 AM

they gave him doritos instead of cheetos?

WTF!!!!! Abu Ghraib # 2 !!!!!!

directfiesta 06-20-2005 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Headless

Meanwhile this man is responsible for the murders of countless ppl... He should be shot.


So are many more, including Bush and Blair ...

WhiteCash 06-20-2005 09:43 AM

I am sure he had a TV and comfy bed as well. fucking rag ----

Gawdy 06-20-2005 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonofsam
they gave him doritos instead of cheetos?

WTF!!!!! Abu Ghraib # 2 !!!!!!

LOL :1orglaugh

ADL Colin 06-20-2005 09:45 AM

"O?Shea said when he told him he was not married, Saddam ?started telling me what to do.? ?He was like, ?you gotta find a good woman. Not too smart, not too dumb. Not too old, not too young. One that can cook and clean.??

Then he smiled, made what O?Shea interpreted as a ?spanking? gesture, laughed and went back to washing his clothes in the sink."

.. One of our own.

DWB 06-20-2005 10:45 AM

dirka dirka dirka

Relish XXX 06-20-2005 10:53 AM

I still love it how we all sold Saddam the weapons and are now pissed off that he used them

theking 06-20-2005 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relish XXX
I still love it how we all sold Saddam the weapons and are now pissed off that he used them

Pig shit.

Relish XXX 06-20-2005 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking
Pig shit.


So where did he buy them from them brains of American war supplies?

stev0 06-20-2005 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Headless

Meanwhile this man is responsible for the murders of countless ppl... He should be shot.

So is Bush...

Sam Granger 06-20-2005 11:10 AM

Thats complete bullshit - america is a sick fucked up country when it comes to treating "terrorist criminals".

theking 06-20-2005 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relish XXX
So where did he buy them from them brains of American war supplies?

The only US weapons ever sold to Iraq were some cluster bombs during the Iraq/Iran conflict...and these were sold indirectly. The US did also sell a few rotary wing aircraft...and these were not gunships. Some US businesses did sell dual use materials...which were weaponized by Iraq. Iraq's weapons of war were bought primarily from the Soviets...but also from the French and Germans. There were no munitions...no mortars...no artillery...no tanks...no armored vehicles...no fixed wing aircraft...no transport vehicles...etc. sold to Iraq by the US. The Iraq Army was also trained by the Soviets.

Sam Granger 06-20-2005 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stev0
So is Bush...

Bush is probably worse - that fucking wanker :321GFY

directfiesta 06-20-2005 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking
The only US weapons ever sold to Iraq were some cluster bombs during the Iraq/Iran conflict...and these were sold indirectly. The US did also sell a few rotary wing aircraft...and these were not gunships. Some US businesses did sell dual use materials...which were weaponized by Iraq. Iraq's weapons of war were bought primarily from the Soviets...but also from the French and Germans. There were no munitions...no mortars...no artillery...no tanks...no armored vehicles...no fixed wing aircraft...no transport vehicles...etc. sold to Iraq by the US. The Iraq Army was also trained by the Soviets.

Sure ...

Maybe like now : supply Soviet stuff and when used blame it on soviets .. ( Bush thinks Putin is a Soviet, not a Russian ...)

Quote:

01/29/04: BAGHDAD -U.S. officials said the Coalition Provisional Authority has sought to procure main battle tanks, armored personnel carrier and other Soviet-origin platforms that could be obtained cheaply and undergo rapid deployment in the Iraqi Army. The platforms would be upgraded by outside contractors that specialize in the modernization of Soviet-origin platforms.

http://www.informationclearinghouse....rticle5599.htm
Since the US is the biggest weapons manufacturer, aside from Israel, where the hell do they sell them ????

FunForOne 06-20-2005 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking
The only US weapons ever sold to Iraq were some cluster bombs during the Iraq/Iran conflict...and these were sold indirectly. The US did also sell a few rotary wing aircraft...and these were not gunships. Some US businesses did sell dual use materials...which were weaponized by Iraq. Iraq's weapons of war were bought primarily from the Soviets...but also from the French and Germans. There were no munitions...no mortars...no artillery...no tanks...no armored vehicles...no fixed wing aircraft...no transport vehicles...etc. sold to Iraq by the US. The Iraq Army was also trained by the Soviets.


Dont tell them that.

It is more fun to here them scream the following two things.

1) The US sold WMD to Sadam
2) Sadam never had any WMD

born 06-20-2005 11:20 AM

What about the Fruit Loops LOL....

They eat better the the bum on our streets!!!

Meta Ridley 06-20-2005 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy
dirka dirka dirka


Exactly.

bringer 06-20-2005 11:50 AM

"For Sunday they're going to be having Orange Glazed Chicken, Fresh Fruit Roupee, Steamed Peas and Mushrooms, Rice Pilaf - we treat them very well," he told Fox.

Last night, Hunter said, the U.S. "torture victims" enjoyed the same kind of gourmet fare, including an entree of "Lemon-baked Fish."

On the other hand, feeding the detainees MRE's, the standard fare given to our troops on the front lines, is strictly verboten - considered an "abuse" under restrictions imposed by Congress, Hunter said.

The top House Republican also noted that the religious practices of the terrorist suspects held at the U.S. "gulag" are scrupulously accommodated, explaining:

"We give them honey and dates when they break fast at Ramadan. We give them prayer beads and prayer oil - all paid for [by the U.S. taxpayer.]

"In fact," he said, "if you did that for American GI's - if you had a call to prayer five times a day - the ACLU would sue on the basis that we violated the separation between church and state."

directfiesta 06-20-2005 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bringer
"For Sunday they're going to be having Orange Glazed Chicken, Fresh Fruit Roupee, Steamed Peas and Mushrooms, Rice Pilaf - we treat them very well," he told Fox.

Last night, Hunter said, the U.S. "torture victims" enjoyed the same kind of gourmet fare, including an entree of "Lemon-baked Fish."

On the other hand, feeding the detainees MRE's, the standard fare given to our troops on the front lines, is strictly verboten - considered an "abuse" under restrictions imposed by Congress, Hunter said.

The top House Republican also noted that the religious practices of the terrorist suspects held at the U.S. "gulag" are scrupulously accommodated, explaining:

"We give them honey and dates when they break fast at Ramadan. We give them prayer beads and prayer oil - all paid for [by the U.S. taxpayer.]

"In fact," he said, "if you did that for American GI's - if you had a call to prayer five times a day - the ACLU would sue on the basis that we violated the separation between church and state."

Wow !!! That's great ... makes you forget you are held against your will and international law for the past 3 years without even be charged ....

Bringer, when are you leaving for Club Gantanamo ??? I heard it is really cheap also.
:1orglaugh

Black Dog 06-20-2005 12:18 PM

LOL... Saddam is going to be 350 lbs. at his trial.

B

taibo 06-20-2005 12:19 PM

they mgot the fake saddam :2 cents:

MetaMan 06-20-2005 12:22 PM

i cant wait to see that new sitcom Saddam is starring in with Ellen on NBC, i think its about a lesbian living in NY with her crazy arab next door neighboor.

called "O SADAAM

cant wait . . .

bringer 06-20-2005 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta
Wow !!! That's great ... makes you forget you are held against your will and international law for the past 3 years without even be charged ....

Bringer, when are you leaving for Club Gantanamo ??? I heard it is really cheap also.
:1orglaugh

i didnt say it was right, i was just pointing out they arent being fed dog shit as many have implied. thanks for the heads up on the newest arguement btw... its not torture anymore, its being held against their will for no reason :1orglaugh international law doesnt apply to people who fight without a uniform from churches.

David! 06-20-2005 12:23 PM

On the advice of my attorney, I will not engage in fruitless political arguments. :2 cents:

bringer 06-20-2005 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PussyMan
On the advice of my attorney, I will not engage in fruitless political arguments. :2 cents:

sounds like good advice. ill follow aswell

directfiesta 06-20-2005 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bringer
1orglaugh international law doesnt apply to people who fight without a uniform from churches.

I see

Quote:

He considers that it is a misinterpretation of the Geneva Conventions to deny prisoner-of-war status to all captured combatants belonging to the armed forces of a State on the sole basis that they failed to wear a uniform.

http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0...256E9F00389619
the real thruth: Army personnel captured during combat operations NOT wearing their uniforms have no protection from Geneva convention...

So basically, if you are invaded and fight against the invader, you are a terrorist ... :1orglaugh

What about if there uniform is ... not to have one.

basschick 06-20-2005 12:36 PM

i read an article that claimed the prisoners in cuba are treated well because of what they are being fed. on the other hand, they are kept up all night, humiliated in many ways, forced to pee in their pants.

if i were a prisoner, i'd rather eat nothing but rice and NOT be abused.

warlock667 06-20-2005 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta
Wow !!! That's great ... makes you forget you are held against your will and international law for the past 3 years without even be charged ....

Bringer, when are you leaving for Club Gantanamo ??? I heard it is really cheap also.
:1orglaugh


You are the biggest dumbtwat on this board.

bringer 06-20-2005 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta
I see



the real thruth: Army personnel captured during combat operations NOT wearing their uniforms have no protection from Geneva convention...

So basically, if you are invaded and fight against the invader, you are a terrorist ... :1orglaugh

What about if there uniform is ... not to have one.

wow, you quoted an opinion of the icrc as fact.
how about this?
Quote:

Combatants must be clearly distinguishable from civilians, wearing uniforms and carrying weapons openly
http://www.legalcenter.com/lc/the-ge...nventions.html
the truth is, the icrc doesnt like the us and have been outspoken against the guantanamo detentions from the beginning.

directfiesta 06-20-2005 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warlock667
You are the biggest dumbtwat on this board.

Ouch ... coming from you, that really hurts .... :1orglaugh


I hear the bell ringing... go back to class now.

theking 06-20-2005 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta
Wow !!! That's great ... makes you forget you are held against your will and international law for the past 3 years without even be charged ....

Bringer, when are you leaving for Club Gantanamo ??? I heard it is really cheap also.
:1orglaugh

They have been deemed to be "illegal enemy combatants" as they do not fall under the protection of the Geneva Convention...because they are not combatants that represent a government or a country.

Admittedly...under the rules of the Geneva Convention...they are supposed to have a formal tribunal make this decision.

FYI...the reason there has not been a single military tribunal...to judge the status of and or sentence the detainees at Gitmo...is because the civilian courts have enjoined the military from holding military tribunals...so until the matter is settled with the civilian courts...the military cannot formally charge the detainees with anything.

No need to thank me for educating you.

sonofsam 06-20-2005 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah

http://worldfootbag.com/magazine/vol...img/record.jpg


stfu.

Luc 06-20-2005 03:12 PM

just make sure you believe EVERYTHING you read. the media has never ever lied.

sacX 06-20-2005 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Headless
You fucking idiots. You thought this thread was about something else eh?

not at all you're so predictable.

Webby 06-20-2005 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking
They have been deemed to be "illegal enemy combatants" as they do not fall under the protection of the Geneva Convention...because they are not combatants that represent a government or a country.

Admittedly...under the rules of the Geneva Convention...they are supposed to have a formal tribunal make this decision.

FYI...the reason there has not been a single military tribunal...to judge the status of and or sentence the detainees at Gitmo...is because the civilian courts have enjoined the military from holding military tribunals...so until the matter is settled with the civilian courts...the military cannot formally charge the detainees with anything.

This "deeming" tendency sounds bad. OK... So we now have "illegal enemy combatants"? Don't think that is any term under Internation law is it?? We just made it up to suit... Odd no other country has found their terrorists to have this wonderful status of being both "illegal" and "enemy combatants". But.. suppose it must be like "illegal aliens".

But then we throw in the Geneva convention and some concept that they are "supposed to have a formal tribunal make this decision." Yeah?? :-) Which is it, ya playing by the Geneva Convention or not?

Civilian courts? Ah.. you mean these places that normally decide on military justice in jurisdictions outside US terrirory and under the terms of the Geneva Convention?

Can't help but love the logic! Tho it's in keeping with everything else - it's always an "issue" and, as always, the US is 100% correct and faultless despite the foul reports from a number of international orgs re the concentration camp. Tho according to the Admin - they were all lying or biased. Yea.. dream on, - along with the WMD fantasy in Iraq.

I kinda "deem" there are a lot of idiots around.

Screaming 06-20-2005 09:23 PM

the whole prison system needs to be reconsidered

sniperwolf 06-20-2005 09:35 PM

hmmm..pampering saddam?

Webby 06-20-2005 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sniperwolf
hmmm..pampering saddam?


The problem with Saddam is that he has lawyers - kinda screws the court case and international law up if they spew out a track record of "Saddam abuse" as well :-)

pornguy 06-20-2005 09:46 PM

I sale short WMD


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123