GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   myVirtualCard Announcement (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=473249)

jungar 05-27-2005 10:46 AM

myVirtualCard Announcement
 
To the GFY Community,

Effective IMMEDIATELY, myVirtualCard has decided to cease processing for underage modeling sites.

As stated last week, we were in the process of removing these sites. By Midnight tonight (12:00AM Eastern Standard Time, May 28th ), we will no longer process for these websites. We have asked all merchants dealing with these sorts of websites to remove our pay buttons from their webpages, and any other affiliation with myVirtualCard. As of midnight tonight, all underage modeling sites will be terminated.

myVirtualCard has always been and continues to be committed to the adult industry. We will continue to do our absolute best to service our clients. We would also like to reaffirm our commitment to be a trusted and reliable force in the adult industry.

We would like to thank the GFY community for voicing your opinion, and we welcome your comments and questions on the matter.

Regards,

The myVirtualCard Team

Theo 05-27-2005 10:47 AM

good move MVC

dready 05-27-2005 10:54 AM

Glad to hear this. :)

TMM_John 05-27-2005 10:54 AM

Great move guys. We're more than happy to see that you have reconsidered processing for these sites and are making a move in the right direction.

nnweb 05-27-2005 11:05 AM

should have done this from the get go.

Snake Doctor 05-27-2005 11:10 AM

Too little too late IMO.......oh we don't support KP "anymore" so it's ok to do business with us.

Bullshit

Damian_Maxcash 05-27-2005 11:12 AM

Good move.....

Sometimes it feels good to be a part of GFY... not often.... but sometimes

pornguy 05-27-2005 11:18 AM

I would never have started processing for something like that.

machinegunkelly 05-27-2005 11:20 AM

too little , too late .


the fact that they did at all is bad enough

SleazyDream 05-27-2005 11:20 AM

so are they back on nats now?

Dirty F 05-27-2005 11:23 AM

It was easy money as long as you stayed under the radar. After some negative attention on a big board a couple of times and people dropping you you suddenly change your policy.
How sad.

If noone has brought you heat here you still wouldve processed for sites with 8 yr old girls you sick fuckers.

Fucking hypocrite pedos.

Dirty F 05-27-2005 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by machinegunkelly
too little , too late .


the fact that they did at all is bad enough

Exactly.

NaughtyRob 05-27-2005 11:24 AM

Good move. Maybe a little too late though.
:2 cents:

jungar 05-27-2005 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franck
It was easy money as long as you stayed under the radar. After some negative attention on a big board a couple of times and people dropping you you suddenly change your policy.
How sad.

If noone has brought you heat here you still wouldve processed for sites with 8 yr old girls you sick fuckers.

Fucking hypocrite pedos.

That is incorrect. Our plan has been known for many months to get rid of these merchants.

Mike A 05-27-2005 11:27 AM

i just wanted to start an underage model site, what processor should i use now?

Dirty F 05-27-2005 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jungar
That is incorrect. Our plan has been known for many months to get rid of these merchants.

1: Why did you do it in the first place?
2: Why did it take months to stop them?

Dirty F 05-27-2005 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike A
i just wanted to start an underage model site, what processor should i use now?

A Russian one ofcourse :thumbsup

The biggest pedo processors are not processing anymore, Verotel and MVC.

born 05-27-2005 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by machinegunkelly
too little , too late .


the fact that they did at all is bad enough


I agree... WTF was MVC thinking... duh!!!! :mad:

WiredGuy 05-27-2005 11:35 AM

Better late than never.
WG

NaughtyRob 05-27-2005 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike A
i just wanted to start an underage model site, what processor should i use now?

Try Paypal idiot. :upsidedow

SmokeyTheBear 05-27-2005 11:38 AM

Well i think its good you guys are taking a stand now. I'm not sure your credibility will get any better for a few years though..

From following the links lee posted , it becomes rather obvious mvc is the main processor for these type of sites ( legal , maybe , sick yes )

So by closing those accounts you will obviously be losing a big profit maker, so that in itself says VOLUMES to me. and kudos for the move..

Many times peoples views do not follow the LAWS.
IBILL STOLE people's money ( illegal ). Yet gfy still advertises them
MVC processes sick sites ( legal? ) yet gfy pulled them. ( dont get me wrong i agree with the move )

It just shows that "legal" and "illegal" dont really mean much in the business world , its all about the money.

MVC realises they will make more money by NOT alienating the rest of the world by processing questionable sites

Libertine 05-27-2005 11:40 AM

Anyone remember the thread that started it al?

:warning I am always right :warning

WebTitan 05-27-2005 11:42 AM

about f'ing time :2 cents:

sexyclicks 05-27-2005 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franck
2: Why did it take months to stop them?

takes a few months to setup a new company with a new name

Digipimp 05-27-2005 11:46 AM

cool, now upgrade the account admin interface, it sucks

Damian_Maxcash 05-27-2005 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
Well i think its good you guys are taking a stand now. I'm not sure your credibility will get any better for a few years though..

From following the links lee posted , it becomes rather obvious mvc is the main processor for these type of sites ( legal , maybe , sick yes )

So by closing those accounts you will obviously be losing a big profit maker, so that in itself says VOLUMES to me. and kudos for the move..

Many times peoples views do not follow the LAWS.
IBILL STOLE people's money ( illegal ). Yet gfy still advertises them
MVC processes sick sites ( legal? ) yet gfy pulled them. ( dont get me wrong i agree with the move )

It just shows that "legal" and "illegal" dont really mean much in the business world , its all about the money.

MVC realises they will make more money by NOT alienating the rest of the world by processing questionable sites

Maybe it is all about the money.... but I like to think that at least some of people, some of the time have morals as well.

MVC have been rebilling upto $99 a month for this shit.... Thats a lot of cash to lose.

We asked them to stop and it seems they have...... Maybe we should give them the benefit of the doubt this time

Dopy 05-27-2005 11:51 AM

Good news - now they will all be running round like headless chickens again looking for a billing Co.

SmokeyTheBear 05-27-2005 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by damian2001
Maybe it is all about the money.... but I like to think that at least some of people, some of the time have morals as well.

If it was just about the morals , they wouldn't have authorized the sites to begin with.. So its obviouslt not about morals..

Quote:

Originally Posted by damian2001
MVC have been rebilling upto $99 a month for this shit.... Thats a lot of cash to lose.

We asked them to stop and it seems they have...... Maybe we should give them the benefit of the doubt this time

I will give them a chance , but its going to take awhile.. first we have to wait and make sure they didnt just make another company name and tell all the pedo sites to switch to the new company..

Theo 05-27-2005 11:54 AM

I can recall 3 other major processors that 3 years ago or less were processing for same sites. That's for those that weren't around or have short memories.

MacDaddyPlaya 05-27-2005 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lenny2
Too little too late IMO.......oh we don't support KP "anymore" so it's ok to do business with us.

Bullshit

The Mac agrees :pimp

teksonline 05-27-2005 12:16 PM

"That is incorrect. Our plan has been known for many months to get rid of these merchants...."
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh oh my God, are you their spokesperson :1orglaugh :1orglaugh


1: Why did you do it in the first place?
They probably needed someone to proccess their own underage sites.

2: Why did it take months to stop them?
They need the money... It's obviously a company not built for long term..
Who on the right mind would use CP to build a business name...
They sucked the funds out, thats obvious, but tarnished their name in doing so... Can you say no college degree?

See ya'll users later when GFY posts announce MVC are not responding, errr are nowhere to be found

Lensman 05-27-2005 12:37 PM

This is great news, I knew they would do the right thing.

jungar 05-27-2005 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teksonline
"That is incorrect. Our plan has been known for many months to get rid of these merchants...."
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh oh my God, are you their spokesperson :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Yes, actually I am their spokesperson

Quote:

Originally Posted by teksonline
1: Why did you do it in the first place?
They probably needed someone to proccess their own underage sites.

No, we do not run paysites.


Quote:

Originally Posted by teksonline
2: Why did it take months to stop them?
They need the money... It's obviously a company not built for long term..
Who on the right mind would use CP to build a business name...
They sucked the funds out, thats obvious, but tarnished their name in doing so... Can you say no college degree?

We have been in business for 3 years; if we were not built for the long term, we would not have gotten rid of these merchants. With regards to your comment on our education, that is patently false. If you want to talk further with us about our longevity, come drop by our booth at InterNext, or come see us at the show in San Diego.

We stand behind our name. We regret that we made some poor choices, but we are here to fix it.

DutchTeenCash 05-27-2005 12:57 PM

Its a step but like many said wrong choice from the beginning on.

chupachups 05-27-2005 12:58 PM

Very good move Josh, I am very happy to hear that:thumbsup

Anyone who is looking for a 3rd party processor should talk to MVC. We have been using them for about an year and so far their services has been nothing but great!

Thee Johnclave 05-27-2005 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jungar
Yes, actually I am their spokesperson



No, we do not run paysites.




We have been in business for 3 years; if we were not built for the long term, we would not have gotten rid of these merchants. With regards to your comment on our education, that is patently false. If you want to talk further with us about our longevity, come drop by our booth at InterNext, or come see us at the show in San Diego.

We stand behind our name. We regret that we made some poor choices, but we are here to fix it.


In the event that you missed the questions as posted by Franck...

1: Why did you do it in the first place?
2: Why did it take months to stop them?

cyber_ninja 05-27-2005 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nnweb
should have done this from the get go.

exactly what i was going to say

Wiggles 05-27-2005 01:09 PM

shouldn't of processed them in the first place, why is everyone congradulating them?

jungar 05-27-2005 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMScore
In the event that you missed the questions as posted by Franck...

1: Why did you do it in the first place?
2: Why did it take months to stop them?

1) The nature of the business we took on is not illegal. The modeling sites we were processing for are not considered illegel, though some people consider it immoral. This was in no way CP or KP , because if it had been, our banks never would have approved these sites. As I have already stated, We made a bad call.

2) As I have explained in earlier threads, we had to slowly phase out these merchants, lest we risk excessive chargebacks etc... If we would have killed their billing on the spot, the merchants could have potentially asked their clients to file a chargeback. We have been getting rid of these merchants slowly for months already.

teksonline 05-27-2005 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jungar
1) The nature of the business we took on is not illegal. The modeling sites we were processing for are not considered illegel, though some people consider it immoral. This was in no way CP or KP , because if it had been, our banks never would have approved these sites. As I have already stated, We made a bad call.

2) As I have explained in earlier threads, we had to slowly phase out these merchants, lest we risk excessive chargebacks etc... If we would have killed their billing on the spot, the merchants could have potentially asked their clients to file a chargeback. We have been getting rid of these merchants slowly for months already.

It took nats to get you to stop, you say you been wanting to do it for months, but since announcement you've done it immediately? and you been slowly getting rid of them, name some sites you have slowly removed? lol

Have you ever seen how these sites are promoted? I have run across them, its a bunch of fucking childporn keyword top lists promoting undersaged teens
then they might have some non nude content pay site... thats fucked up that you are pleading ignorance and legality. you dam well know it's tied to KP

If their promotion is illegal how can their site be? the content may be legal, but definatealy not how its marketed..


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123