GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Kid admits to telling lies about Michael Jackson (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=441613)

Fletch XXX 03-08-2005 03:46 PM

Kid admits to telling lies about Michael Jackson
 
he is gonna get off because these kids are fucking telling LIES ON THE STAND and UNDER OATH

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory?id=562134

Fletch XXX 03-08-2005 03:46 PM

SANTA MARIA, Calif. Mar 8, 2005 ? A 14-year-old boy who testified that Michael Jackson molested his brother acknowledged under cross-examination Tuesday that the pop star didn't show him a sex magazine that the prosecution had introduced into evidence. The witness also said he lied under oath in a separate civil lawsuit.

flashfire 03-08-2005 03:46 PM

he already got off and thats why hes on trial

sexyclicks 03-08-2005 03:47 PM

of course he will walk

James White 03-08-2005 03:47 PM

Oh god. Hes gonna get off.

Manowar 03-08-2005 03:47 PM

If he promises to make another album as Thriller they should lower the sentence

StuartD 03-08-2005 03:48 PM

sig spot :glugglug

Corleone 03-08-2005 03:50 PM

"Did someone tell you to lie in the J.C. Penney case?" Mesereau asked.

"I don't remember," the boy said.

When Mesereau asked him to tell the jury why he lied under oath, the boy said: "I don't remember. It was five years ago. I don't remember nothing."

no money this time oooh :(

Tala 03-08-2005 03:52 PM

Bwahahahahahahahahaha!

Apparently Mom didn't brief the boy on what to say. She's not getting $$ this time.

Barefootsies 03-08-2005 03:55 PM

No bling bling d'is time kiddies.

:321GFY

Holly Lez! 03-08-2005 03:58 PM

This part is really shady "Jackson's attorney also referred to a civil suit the boys' mother filed against a department store company over an encounter with security guards. The mother claimed she was sexually assaulted and the family was beaten by the store guards. The defense contends the suit shows the family has a history of filing false claims to get money"

The mother has sued other people in the past... She seems like a money hungry bitch to me...

TheLegacy 03-08-2005 04:00 PM

wow.. so mj can get off

baddog 03-08-2005 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX
he is gonna get off because these kids are fucking telling LIES ON THE STAND and UNDER OATH

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory?id=562134


How about he is going to get off because he didn't do it?

Fletch XXX 03-08-2005 04:21 PM

ah true, but thats not exactly why this case would go this way.

if he gets off due to THIS and not due to evidence, i would be correct, however, if he got off due to lengthy court trial, and was found innocent that would be different.

winning a pool game because the other guy scratches on the eightball has never been considered a "win" to me.

win by default doesnt equate innocence, i do however see your point ;)

Za Ha 03-08-2005 04:24 PM

If he is guilty he will get off cause of all his millions!
In the US everyone but Martha wins cause of their money.

Or he may actually be a really nice guy, and not have molested any of those kids.

Furious_Male 03-08-2005 04:26 PM

I honestly don't know what the hell to believe.

sweetME 03-08-2005 04:29 PM

I think, he's just an easy target. Look at him, he already looks like a weirdo, the rest is easy.

baddog 03-08-2005 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX
ah true, but thats not exactly why this case would go this way.

if he gets off due to THIS and not due to evidence, i would be correct, however, if he got off due to lengthy court trial, and was found innocent that would be different.

Isn't the evidence the testimony of those that were supposedly molested?

Sorry, but the more I watch this, the more it reminds me of the McMartin Preschool Trial.

Everyone had them convicted too . . . .until the testimony started.

TheLegacy 03-08-2005 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX
ah true, but thats not exactly why this case would go this way.

if he gets off due to THIS and not due to evidence, i would be correct, however, if he got off due to lengthy court trial, and was found innocent that would be different.

winning a pool game because the other guy scratches on the eightball has never been considered a "win" to me.

win by default doesnt equate innocence, i do however see your point ;)


i have been trying to put my feelings about this case into words and couldnt until you clearly illustrated it. It is like the pool game - not a 'win'.

After Shock Media 03-08-2005 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
Sorry, but the more I watch this, the more it reminds me of the McMartin Preschool Trial.

Shh who said intellegence was allowed here.

Fletch XXX 03-08-2005 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
Isn't the evidence the testimony of those that were supposedly molested?

Sorry, but the more I watch this, the more it reminds me of the McMartin Preschool Trial.

Everyone had them convicted too . . . .until the testimony started.

you are taking my posts incorrectly man.

i have SINCE DAY ONE!!! said let the court decide.

i wont dig up posts but i was on this board saying let the courts decide when this shit came out man.

the court IS deciding, and i already agreed with you i have no idea why you think i disagree...

Fletch XXX 03-08-2005 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLegacy
i have been trying to put my feelings about this case into words and couldnt until you clearly illustrated it. It is like the pool game - not a 'win'.

i have played in tournaments and have won mkany games this way.

i have never considered it a win.

the other guy lost, but i didnt win.

you either BEAT someone at pool, or you dont.

Fletch XXX 03-08-2005 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX
he is gonna get off because these kids are fucking telling LIES ON THE STAND and UNDER OATH

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory?id=562134

you take this for me claiming guilt.

no.

regardless of anything, if he gets off due to lies under oath, that does NOT mean he is innocent.

i went NO DEEPER

AdultMovies.bz 03-08-2005 04:38 PM

It doesn't matter if he is innocent, the media already made sure he will never be seen as anything but guilty anyway...

baddog 03-08-2005 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX
you are taking my posts incorrectly man.

I don't know, I guess it had something to do with "if he gets off due to THIS and not due to evidence, i would be correct, however, if he got off due to lengthy court trial, and was found innocent that would be different."

But as long as you agree with me, it is all good :)

mistress69 03-08-2005 04:39 PM

he still seems guilty to me

mahoney 03-08-2005 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
How about he is going to get off because he didn't do it?


LOL ummm love ya baddog but how about... MJ is a Text Book child Molestor and "Never Land" is nothing but kiddie bait. A first year psych student could tell you that michael jackson fits the profile of a text book Child Molestor. During the first interview with Martin B. he admits to saying to the cancer victim "if you love me you will sleep in my bed" That is some serious child molestation manipulation :Oh crap :2 cents:

baddog 03-08-2005 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mistress69
he still seems guilty to me

based on what?

baddog 03-08-2005 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mahoney
LOL ummm love ya baddog but how about... MJ is a Text Book child Molestor and "Never Land" is nothing but kiddie bait. A first year psych student could tell you that michael jackson fits the profile of a text book Child Molestor. During the first interview with Martin B. he admits to saying to the cancer victim "if you love me you will sleep in my bed" That is some serious child molestation manipulation :Oh crap :2 cents:


I am not denying that the guy is one of the weirdest guys on the planet

Fletch XXX 03-08-2005 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
I don't know, I guess it had something to do with "if he gets off due to THIS and not due to evidence, i would be correct, however, if he got off due to lengthy court trial, and was found innocent that would be different."

But as long as you agree with me, it is all good :)

man you know as well as i do, message boards, exact thoughts, do not mix.

i cant word my thoughts correctly all the time.

i said nowhere on this board EVER, that he was guilty.

my point still stands in that regard:

if he gets off due to a kid telling lies under oath, why would one assume that means his innocence?

that is the exact same as because you scratched on the eightball, my pool skills are better than yours.

not the case.

technicalities do not mean innocence.

now, on the other hand. Say the kid was not caught in a lie, and despite his testimony Michael was found INNOCENT, dont you think that would carry more weight than getting off on a technicality?

that was my simply point.... sorry i cant word this shit right.

i havent drank or smoked pot in so long sobreity fucks me up more than intoxicants

:1orglaugh

robfantasy 03-08-2005 04:50 PM

i hope it shows that the kids were lying.

AdultMovies.bz 03-08-2005 04:52 PM

I`m just waiting for that guy "The King" to see this thread, as soon as that happens its all on haha, hes like that police officer dude on that "Jeffersons" ep of South Park :)

tungsten 03-08-2005 04:53 PM

damn kids these days

Fletch XXX 03-08-2005 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdultMovies.bz
I`m just waiting for that guy "The King" to see this thread, as soon as that happens its all on haha, hes like that police officer dude on that "Jeffersons" ep of South Park :)

"ill never put an innocent man behind bars again unless i KNOW HE'S BLACK!"

thats a great episode

NichePay_Manny 03-08-2005 04:56 PM

What a mess !!!!!

Drake 03-08-2005 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tala
Bwahahahahahahahahaha!

Apparently Mom didn't brief the boy on what to say. She's not getting $$ this time.


Exactly. While Jackson is a freak, I don't think he molested this kid (it wouldn't surprise me if he did, but I doubt it).

Kevsh 03-08-2005 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashfire
he already got off and thats why hes on trial

quick one :1orglaugh

Deepai 03-08-2005 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James White
Oh god. Hes gonna get off.

Yea, it would be horrible for him to get off even if he's innocent.





thats sarcasm btw.

Theo 03-08-2005 05:04 PM

the first 100 times he is innocent.....

the guy is fucked up in mind. Do you remember when he was holding his son with one hand outside a balcony? Great father.

AdultMovies.bz 03-08-2005 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soul_Rebel
the first 100 times he is innocent.....

the guy is fucked up in mind. Do you remember when he was holding his son with one hand outside a balcony? Great father.

LOL, thats nothing, the "Crocodile Hunter" from here in Aus took his baby into the Crocodile enclosure and held it next to the croc's mouth for a publicity stunt hahaha puts things in perspective...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123