GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Michael Jackson: Guilty or not? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=437038)

Rochard 02-25-2005 09:24 PM

Michael Jackson: Guilty or not?
 
I'm reading about the Michael Jackson trial and this is starting to get out of hand. Seems to me they can't make the 13 year old boy look bad, so they are going after the mother. They are accusing her of prior lawsuits against JC Penney's and Tower Records, and saying saying the mother used money donated by celeberties to pay for her's child's cancer treatmean for "cosmetic surgery".

Do you think he's guilty or not?

Hot Visions 02-25-2005 09:25 PM

i think he is guilty as fuck! :pimp

kmanrox 02-25-2005 09:25 PM

um i thought the answer was obvious? nobody pays tens of millions of dollars to kids unless he's guilty... hello

digi 02-25-2005 09:27 PM

I think he is a weirdo, but I dont think he raped the boy so innocent.

Love Brokers 02-25-2005 09:27 PM

Jacko's face should be printed in all Criminology and Police Science Books next to the caption, "Textbook example of a Pedofile."

JFPdude 02-25-2005 09:29 PM

Guilty !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

thaifan99 02-25-2005 09:31 PM

Guilty as sin......but gonna get off!

AdultMovies.bz 02-25-2005 09:36 PM

Innocent until proven guilty, still havent seen any actual proof, just allegations, and anyone can have those if it means money :)

Project-Shadow 02-25-2005 09:38 PM

As much as I hate to admit it I think he's guilty.

Spunky 02-25-2005 09:41 PM

http://www.renegadetgp.com/Iminnocent.jpg

2HousePlague 02-25-2005 09:42 PM

I'd say guilty, insofar as I DO believe he crossed a line.

But, I just don't think, poor, tortured, distorted, victim-in-his-own-right Michael Jackson knew were that line was.


j-

OG LennyT 02-25-2005 09:47 PM

If Jacko is innocent so was OJ



that pedo-freak is gonna know "hard" time

axelcat 02-25-2005 09:47 PM

very very guilty

mardigras 02-25-2005 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RocHard
They are accusing her of prior lawsuits against JC Penney's and Tower Records

She actually got a $150.000 settlement against JC Pennys...

Nader 02-25-2005 10:30 PM

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh
Quote:

Originally Posted by spunky

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Guilty !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

xclusive 02-25-2005 10:32 PM

so fucking guilty and so are the parents that let thier kids around him

mal 02-25-2005 10:36 PM

guilty as sin

2HousePlague 02-25-2005 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xclusive
so fucking guilty and so are the parents that let thier kids around him

Interesting spin on the question of culpability.

Since these parents were not guilty of simple inattention or neglect, but of being swept up into Michael Jackson's celebrity, what is THEIR share of the responsibility?


j-

emthree 02-25-2005 10:40 PM

Guilty - but I think the kids parents got something dirty going on.

yellowmenace 02-25-2005 10:46 PM

guilty dude.

rollinOn20s 02-25-2005 10:50 PM

Don't matter if hes black or white!

Spunky 02-25-2005 10:53 PM

Most Celebritys always get let off with basically a slap on the wrist..O.J.,Kobe ..etc etc...Jackson will be another one :2 cents:

FredIsMe 02-25-2005 10:55 PM

who are we to judge? we dont know michael personally, and the only thing we have to go by is what the media has told us. Personally, I dont trust the media.

Zebra 02-25-2005 10:58 PM

http://www.crazytees.com/thumbs/d_72.gif

dubious media 02-25-2005 11:00 PM

http://orifice.net/cave/1567.jpg

Rochard 02-25-2005 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spunky
Most Celebritys always get let off with basically a slap on the wrist..O.J.,Kobe ..etc etc...Jackson will be another one :2 cents:

Odd. I think OJ was guilty, yet not Kobe (note that I'm not a sports fan at all).

I think Wacko Jacko is guilty.

Spunky 02-25-2005 11:28 PM

My point being..if you have the money and fame you can buy freedom

pxxx 02-25-2005 11:31 PM

he is innocent, point blank.

spideriux 02-26-2005 04:40 AM

of Course Guilty !

Manowar 02-26-2005 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spunky

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

robfantasy 02-26-2005 05:13 AM

Why the fuck is michael jackson sleeping with little kids

Scott McD 02-26-2005 05:13 AM

Guilty as hell :2 cents:

mardigras 02-26-2005 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spunky
Most Celebritys always get let off with basically a slap on the wrist..O.J.,Kobe ..etc etc...Jackson will be another one :2 cents:

The investigators and the prosecution totally bungled the OJ case. The Kobe deal was a case of "he said" "she said" that she screwed up by going and having sex with someone else before going to the hospital to be examined for the supposed rape.

MJ will be found not guilty if the judge allows all of the mother's attempts to sue various people/businesses (including for sexual molestation). On the otherhand, Tom Sneddon is going to pull out all punches. He's made no secret over the past decade+ of how desperately he wants to jail MJ.

$5 submissions 02-26-2005 07:13 AM

We've heard of the evidence. But it hasn't been 'tested' yet through cross examination and assessment by rival experts. Once we get this discourse then we'd all be in a better position to determine guilt.

Remember--innocent until PROVEN guilty.

Another reminder: PROOF beyond a REASONABLE doubt is a very high threshold and is not to be taken lightly. It means stepping outside of one's preconceptions ....

Sexy-Girl 02-26-2005 07:18 AM

i really donīt know, i can not judge, but is pretty strainge situation, and everyhting seems to go against him.

mardigras 02-26-2005 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions
We've heard of the evidence. But it hasn't been 'tested' yet through cross examination and assessment by rival experts. Once we get this discourse then we'd all be in a better position to determine guilt.

Remember--innocent until PROVEN guilty.

Another reminder: PROOF beyond a REASONABLE doubt is a very high threshold and is not to be taken lightly. It means stepping outside of one's preconceptions ....

Actually we've only heard of supposed evidence. We've heard accusations that were "leaked" by whomever for whatever reason. Accusations that are going to be very hard to prove beyond reasonable doubt.

robfantasy 02-26-2005 07:20 AM

this is all fueled by dollar signs

mardigras 02-26-2005 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robfantasy
this is all fueled by dollar signs

I'm afraid you're right. The family can later sue in civil court and win even if MJ is found not guilty in criminal court.

Drake 02-26-2005 07:27 AM

I don't know enough yet to make any judgement. I also haven't followed the case at all as I don't watch tv.

Is Jackson weird? Yes

Is he irresponsible and stupid for sleeping the same bed with strangers' children? Yes

Does he molests boys? I don't know

If GFY represents the general public, the public has already sentenced him. But the law hasn't. Let's hope the legal system works and makes the right decision.

We need more than accusations, heresay, and preconceptions to make a judgement one way or the other.

Focal 02-26-2005 07:27 AM

Maybe guilty, or maybe not.

But I like his old songs!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123