*Proof* That GFY Has millions of unwanted Surfers Viewing.
 

http://kmradult.com/owned/graph.bmp

I can't wait until this settles down.

Name them off here. I need a list.

Lol, that's fucked up...

yeah, but i'm crying about a few. that looks like more than a few.

wow

:eek2 :eek2 :eek2

Holy shit! Who do we have to thanks for all this unwanted attention. Thats fucked up.

So fucking what...
For the 10th time they cant register!!!

And if Lensman cant handle it then he would redirect gfy.com to something else...

The next person who opens a thread about surfers will get their keyboard rammed up their ass by me personally. Fucking stop it already!

holy fuck.

true.... :S

wow, alot of growth in january.

the paris hilton & the nypost.com

amazing.

get their emails and spam them with tranny midget sites!





j/k

Oh no, not a liberal wielding a keyboard! Oh the terror.

I just logged out and a login screen appeared. Underneath the login screen, was a link that said: Register here to post or something.

Not that it fucking matters but still..

I could careless. It is an interesting graph though :)

Quantum-X for saying gfy.com in the recordings

Learn how to read an alexa graph, then return.

Thanks

I know quite well how to read and view that graph. AS well as the traffic trend change

which is gone up

Today 1 wk. Avg. 3 mos. Avg. 3 mos. Change
7,237 10,510 23,455 255,574

Hmmmmm maybe instead of posting to TGPs I should post my galleries here.

https://gfy.com/register.php

On the first page. You can't view threads unlesss you are registered, but you can still register.

that needs the following tag: GFY Owned By Surfers :helpme

LOLOL Yeah for real. One hell of a tgp this would make... if its not aleady.

:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

no, those responsible for taking this outside of gfy.
if they'd stayed here like they were meant to, there would have been no problems.

lollersk8s

ok lets start with you.


One

That does not mean millions of additional surfers.

What is Reach?
Reach measures the number of users. Reach is typically expressed as the percentage of all Internet users who visit a given site. So, for example, if a site like yahoo.com has a reach of 28%, this means that if you took random samples of one million Internet users, you would on average find that 280,000 of them visit yahoo.com. Alexa expresses reach as number of users per million. Alexa's one-week and three-month average reach are measures of daily reach, averaged over the specified time period. The reach rank is a ranking of all sites based solely on their reach. The three-month changes are determined by comparing a site's current reach and reach rank with its values from three month ago.

Some Important Disclaimers
The traffic data are based on the set of Alexa users, which may not be a representative sample of the global Internet population. Known biases include (but are likely not limited to) the following:

Our users are disproportionately likely to visit alexa.com, amazon.com and archive.org, and traffic to these sites may be substantially overcounted.
The Alexa Toolbar works only with the Internet Explorer browser. Sites frequented mainly by users of other browsers will be undercounted. For example, the AOL/Netscape browser is not supported, which means that Alexa collects little data from AOL users, and our traffic to aol.com is likely lower than it would be for a more representative sample.
The Alexa Toolbar works only on Windows operating systems. Although a large majority of the Internet population currently used Windows, traffic to any sites which are disproportionately visited by users of other operating systems will be undercounted.
The rate of adoption of Alexa software in different parts of the world may vary widely due to advertising locality, language, and other geographic and cultural factors. For example, to some extent the prominence of Korean sites among our top-ranked sites reflects known high rates of general Internet usage in South Korea, but there may also be a disproportionate number of Korean Alexa users.
In some cases traffic data may also be adversely affected by our "site" definitions. With tens of millions of hosts on the Internet, our automated procedures for determining which hosts are serving the "same" content may be incorrect and/or out-of-date. Similarly, the determinations of domains and home pages may not always be accurate. When these determinations change (as they do periodically), there may be sudden artificial changes in the Alexa traffic rankings for some sites as a consequence.
The Alexa Toolbar turns itself off on secure pages (https:). Sites with secure page views will be under-represented in the Alexa traffic data.
In addition to the biases above, the Alexa user base is only a sample of the Internet population, and sites with relatively low traffic will not be accurately ranked by Alexa due to the statistical limitations of the sample. Alexa's data come from a large sample of several million Alexa Toolbar users; however, this is not large enough to accurately determine the rankings of sites with fewer than roughly 1,000 total monthly visitors. Generally, Traffic Rankings of 100,000+ should be regarded as not reliable because the amount of data we receive is not statistically significant. Conversely, the more traffic a site receives (the closer it gets to the number 1 position), the more reliable its Traffic Ranking becomes.

Yes, Thats correct that doesn't mean 80 million have viewed GFY But the ammount of reached has increased. You can look at the traffic trend stats and determin how much GFY's Traffic has increased on an AVG based on ranking with other alexa ranked sites

So fucking what.

Did you ever check Alexa's stats for GoFuckYourself.com?

There is actually a downword traffic trend. So, a few people typed in gfy.com instead.

Hi, dumbass The point of this thread was to point out unwanted surfers.

Gofuckyourself.com WAS not announced But

GFY.com was announced over prank calls as well as NYpost.

Prank calls? like "save the Mediterranean Goose" one?

lmao....... too much Paris Hilton stuff.... rofl

You have absoultely no clue about alexa, so please stop replying, Read Cj Ryan's posts again.

so whats why we have been so god damn slow the past couple days :(

bullshit...you knew quite well this would go out...

why didn't you send them somewhere else...pff :disgust

Your a dumbass.