![]() |
How Bad Of A Fuckup Is Iraq?
On a scale of 1-10, where 10 is the ultimate fuckup.
I'm curious what the popular opinion is here. |
Have to wait a decade or so to see how big. Could very well turn out to be a 10. Right now I'll go with 8.
|
How they voted this guy back in is beyond me.
|
I really don't see how we could have fucked it up worst...
|
tony404, dont be so harsh, i am glad he was voted back in. That way it keeps the eye off of us here in Canada, and OUR plans for global domination.
|
7-8 atm.
|
Before us: 7
After: 10 :glugglug |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
8
|
Looking like a full on 10 these days. :(
My father is a military guy (retired) and staunch Republican that was very much against going in to Iraq and every reason he gave has come to pass. This is going to be some fucked up shit and it is just getting started. |
Your question presumes it was a mistake at all. To be fair (and frankly, honest) you should ask first IF it was a mistake.
IMO, Iraq was not a fuckup. It's working beautifully. Here's why: Killing terrorists in Falujah is MUCH easier than chasing them through Tora Bora. The terrorists are, ironically enough, "bringing the mountain to mohammed" by coming into Iraq to fight us. This was one of the clearly stated goals of our strategy in Iraq. Beautiful. Sadaam Hussein is a megalomaniac whose personal goal is domination in the Arab world. He sees himself as the next great pan-arab leader. One of the ways in which he has tried to accomplish this (and this is why it matters), is by getting control of enough oil reserves to leverage his way into the game. This job was left unfinished in 1991, and it is finished now. I mean, who the hell thinks its a good idea to allow that guy to have a grip on the world economy? It was real-politik in action. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
So I guess you think Iraq has played out perfectly and you would give it a 0 on the fuckup scale.
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh Quote:
|
Quote:
The terrorists never were in Iraq. That's not who the US was going after when they entered. The terrorists that are dying there now? Sure, you can call them terrorists... I am willing to bet that they call themselves freedom fighters who are trying to stop the invaders into their own country. Don't go praising the deaths of terrorists when it was the US that made them into "terrorists" in the first place by taking over their land. |
Quote:
1) We're still running across unmarked graves, and even if we weren't, who the hell can say how many Sadaam's henchmen killed? You know that for a fact, do you? Get off! Man wake up and read a little history about things like the Final Solution, the Balkans, and Rwanda. Ask yourself what happens when something is done and when something isn't done. Are you even for real? Don't even bother trying to defend that stupid ass point. 2) The warnings must be unheeded. Otherwise how could we be killing so many civilians? Something about your position doesn't make sense. Try using your head without it being up your ass. Read something in addition to the crap you're obviously reading. Get both sides, and it should become clear what's going on. |
1. The war isn't over yet.
2. We need a good staging point for when we invade Iran So I'll give it a 3 on a fuck up scale of 1-10 because I think it wasn't a bad idea but was presented to us under the wrong pretenses. May the sun never set on the American empire. |
Quote:
|
Invading Iraq was not nor is a fuck-up ... it is what's best for the world. Sure, forcing a society/culture to adopt an ideology, such as Democracy, is wrong, but keeping them oppressed is even worse.
How could a woman from Iraq know about equality? How could a person know they are being oppressed unless freedom is shown to them? I could go on about this but instead I will end it off with GO BUSH GO! :thumbsup |
I went with a 10 - but who knows maybe it can get better. But at the moment it is a 10. I don't think we had any right to invade with the intel we had. But that is just my :2 cents:
jDoG |
Quote:
|
Quote:
it's called "Sticking your nose where it doesn't belong" and it's how US gets the bad end of terrorist attacks in the first place. |
Quote:
I really think we're going to have to wait and see... I'm hoping that the 'planting the seeds of democracy' thing works out and that it doesn't end up being another 'kicking an anthill' and stirring up more hate :/ again, only time will tell... |
Quote:
Quote:
Fact. Even the retards International Institute of Strategic Studies said so :1orglaugh |
Quote:
Since you want to "clarify things", let's be absolutely sure what a "terrorist" is. A "terrorist" is someone who intentionally targets civilians, ie women, children, non-combatant shopkeepers, etc. That's what a terrorist is, and I'd like you to try and deny that plenty of innocent civilians have been targeted by your "Freedom Fighters" in Iraq. Next point? I can knock these out of the park all day long. Gimme a fast ball! |
The current US stance towards the violence and war in Iraq is the same as it was during the early stages of Vietnam.
In a few years, you'll smell the shit, wake up and realise the terrorists testicles are larger than yours :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh |
anyone who supports this rediculous "war" is an idiot and an asshole. i'm just seething over this. isn't it just plain that this is a power grab by dumbya and his crazy neocon nazi assholes?
To justify this is like trying to find meaning in your last bowel movement. to believe anything at all that comes from this administration, is beyond gullibility and simplemindedness. |
Quote:
You're making more sense all the time. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
You went to Iraq because the military industry strongly wanted it. You went to Iraq as an effort to help re-election through spreading fear. Do you real think besides you, me and the rest normal people anyone else gives a shit if Saddam was megalomaniac or if he was evil to iraqii people? Nobody. It's all about money and power. |
Quote:
This doesn't make sense. "on their land". Iraq. So, these people are Iraqis who do not and have never lived in Iraq? What are you trying to say? Quote:
were terrorists, as were the British, the Germans, and the Soviets. If you're talking about using smart weapons to try and take out the bad guys with minimal damage to surrounding areas and civilians, then you are wrong. They are not terrorists. These weapons were specifically developed to increase the probability of a kill while at the same time minimizing the amount of firepower expended (and therefore the number of civilian casualites). In other words, civilized nations have gone to very great expense to correct these errors in their policies and lessen the horror of war. Nice try, buckwheat. Anymore softballs? LOL That kind of shit flies on Larry King, but don't think that it's idiotic and dishonest slant won't be challenged in here. |
Quote:
Did I question whether the US is the worlds only superpower? NO. Does it matter in wars like Iraq or Vietnam? HELL FUCKING NO. |
Neo-republicans and those who vote/support Bush have lost their status of "human being" and are below animals, hence the creatures maybe killed indiscriminately :2 cents:
|
The fuckup was thinking you could go in with 150,000 soldiers to police a completely unstable country of 30 Million.
Fucking idiots. It takes years to rebuild and reconstitute a government. Especially when you are displacing the power structure run by the majoriy with the minority in control. |
The fuckup was going in there in the first place.... no moral highground, no UN support, no justification.
I reckon this will be a historical fuck up of all fuck ups and I estimate that it will escalate to World War 3 in some form or another - mass destruction is bound to be the end result. |
Four years of Bush were one big fuck up.
Never before the US has made such a big fool of itself as during the past years. |
Quote:
What is even worse...in my opinion...is the fact that the Secretary of Defense still refuses to insert more troops. I am sure that he must have a reason for not inserting more troops...a reason that the public is unaware of. Of course one of the primary reasons is that our forces...globally are being over extended...which is the fault of the Congress approving the cut of approximately a million active duty personel beginning with President Bush Senior's admin and carried out throughout President Clinton's admin. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123