GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Choker banned! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=405936)

BloodFart 12-20-2004 08:50 PM

Choker banned!
 
Who SHOULD be banned

Sleazydream for posting "in 6 years she could be a pornstar" refering to chokers 12 year old daughter

or choker who IS BANNED for calling him a pedo

Doctor Dre 12-20-2004 08:52 PM

It's Lensman's call, not ours

European Lee 12-20-2004 08:52 PM

Who cares :2 cents:

Regards,

Lee

Sly 12-20-2004 08:53 PM

Neither.

polish_aristocrat 12-20-2004 08:53 PM

hehe, you stole my idea to make a poll

but I don't think this poll will have much influence on Lensman's decision

pussyluver 12-20-2004 08:53 PM

It would take choker a hell of a long time to catch up to all the nasty stuff Sleazy has said on the board.

Dre is right, not our call in the end.

digifan 12-20-2004 08:57 PM

I think none of them should be banned.. they are able to sort this out themselves, they are adults and not the typical schoolboys looking for drama.

pussyluver 12-20-2004 09:00 PM

Tribal council meeting tonight ? not looking good for Sleazy.

polish_aristocrat 12-20-2004 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by pussyluver
Tribal council meeting tonight ? not looking good for Sleazy.
5% : 95% so far

:glugglug

JayJay 12-20-2004 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly
Neither.

Funky Bastard 12-20-2004 09:36 PM

If chokers gone the Sleazy needs to go with him! :2 cents:

Basic_man 12-20-2004 09:37 PM

I prefer Choker to Sleazy ! :warning

KMR Stitch 12-20-2004 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Doctor Dre
It's Lensman's call, not ours

JayJay 12-20-2004 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by HKS
If chokers gone the Sleazy needs to go with him! :2 cents:
Thats true

polish_aristocrat 12-20-2004 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Basic_man
I prefer Choker to Sleazy ! :warning
Judging by the poll you are not the only one.

emthree 12-20-2004 09:44 PM

You like feeding on other peoples probs, dont you?
You're a fucking bottom feeding bitch :2 cents:

emthree 12-20-2004 09:46 PM

shit - I voted wrong.
That makes it -1 for choker and +1 for sleazydream should be banned.

18clips 12-20-2004 09:48 PM

Nobody Vote Its Mean Spirited & Not in The Theme of Christmas


Get these 2 hevy weight prize fighting cocks in the ring!

If its true the vote should be on wether Lensman has the right to judge, if he's so willing to do so maybe he could referee the boxing

Choker V Mr Sleze


At the next big gathering we should have a boxing ring with choker in one corner and mr sleez in the other wearing those huge over-sized boxing gloves. Loser gives $1000 to the winners charity.

sean416 12-20-2004 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by emthree
shit - I voted wrong.
That makes it -1 for choker and +1 for sleazydream should be banned.

lol. you just shitted on the guy for makign the poll, then you voted on the poll, and fucked up your answer. :1orglaugh

I dont mean to laugh at you, but even you gotta admit thats kinda funny.:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Meloncash 12-20-2004 09:51 PM

Ban them both, then unban the Boobmaster

maxdaname 12-20-2004 09:54 PM

Sleazy is a god :2 cents:

GiantGnome 12-20-2004 09:56 PM

calling someone a pedo gets you banned? since when?

BloodFart 12-20-2004 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by emthree
shit - I voted wrong.
That makes it -1 for choker and +1 for sleazydream should be banned.

So you're being a parasite on my bottom feeding poll? fucking asshat.

pussyluver 12-20-2004 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by HKS
If chokers gone the Sleazy needs to go with him! :2 cents:
Agree.

If you have much of a post count, you've prolly said somethings you wish you could take back. I have. Does the thread in question really rise to a ban? Pimpdogg used to make very offensive slurs and not get banned. He did go far enough to get banned though.

Why not let the dust settle. Ban Choker and I'm not sure he'd come back? Other than that, the board seems to be speaking through the poll.

Someone could be fucking with the board too??? There are those around with the technical ability to stir some shit.

Gotta believe, given who is involved that there would be some one on one discussion with the parties involved before a ban.


My :2 cents:

1215 12-20-2004 10:12 PM

i dont think people should really post pics of any kids on here, especially their own. first, its just not right, simple conflict of interest. second, youre setting yourself up for asshole remarks. wether its a joke or not, you walked yourself into it by placing your own kids on the net, especially an adult related one. what, did you expect sleazy to say that in 4 years, shell be driving? hell, his nick says it all. now if chokers says it all as well, sleazy is in some trouble!

from another point of view, sleazy's joke completely fit the scenario of this forum - adult related and not giving a fuck. however, if someone posts their kids, you might have a little respect and not joke about them.

so...
1 - you shouldnt post kids pics here anyway, especially your own. i can see if its some random funny pic from the net, or a video of some kid falling off his skateboard. stuff like that would be ok.

2 - when people arent thinking in the right mind and post their kids here, dont insult them, even if its a joke. most people take pride in their kids, so a joke on their kids is a real slap in the face.

think about it, if you ban one of them, theres gonna be 9003345 posts about how it was unfair and why the unbanned should be banned.

id drop it and ban no one. but both of them should be warned to stop being a retard.

Babaganoosh 12-20-2004 10:31 PM

Since when did GFY become a democracy? I wish we could vote on banning people but so far that isn't a possibility.

Double L 12-20-2004 10:35 PM

Neither or Both...

SleazyDream 12-20-2004 11:00 PM

I recognised maybe 2 people in this thread - choker must be working very hard on his icq right now with his clients.


here's the reason that I see.

My comment was RUDE - I admit that. It;s GFY for fucks sake - read the God damn url. It pulled at his heart and disgusted him and others but it WASN'T liable. It was designed to wake him up about the STUPIDITY of posting a video with the full face of his 12 year old daughter on GFY - an ADULT webmaster board loaded with nude sexual pictures. It was no different than the people who said they couldn't wait for the olsen twins to turn 18 to see the nude photos. It wasn't liable.

Calling me a Pedo REPEATLY was liable, my comment was not about his daughter NOW, it was a speculation about her WHEN she turns legal, 6 years from now. A pedo would have made a comment about her NOW. Choker called me repeatadly a Pedo is liable and shows his real true stupidity.

I pray when the idiot cools down and looks at this ratinally he wakes up to this fact that his comments were liable and wrong and dangerous to my and his reputation.


Personally I think Choker is a good guy with a great business but just really stupid in some personal things. I don't want to see him banned for life - I'd be more than content with just a one week suspension - a cool off period, but I'm not the one who makes those decisions. I hope that having a week to think about his LIABLE comments will allow him to see the light.

broke 12-20-2004 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 1215
i dont think people should really post pics of any kids on here, especially their own. first, its just not right, simple conflict of interest. second, youre setting yourself up for asshole remarks. wether its a joke or not, you walked yourself into it by placing your own kids on the net, especially an adult related one. what, did you expect sleazy to say that in 4 years, shell be driving? hell, his nick says it all. now if chokers says it all as well, sleazy is in some trouble!

from another point of view, sleazy's joke completely fit the scenario of this forum - adult related and not giving a fuck. however, if someone posts their kids, you might have a little respect and not joke about them.

so...
1 - you shouldnt post kids pics here anyway, especially your own. i can see if its some random funny pic from the net, or a video of some kid falling off his skateboard. stuff like that would be ok.

2 - when people arent thinking in the right mind and post their kids here, dont insult them, even if its a joke. most people take pride in their kids, so a joke on their kids is a real slap in the face.

think about it, if you ban one of them, theres gonna be 9003345 posts about how it was unfair and why the unbanned should be banned.

id drop it and ban no one. but both of them should be warned to stop being a retard.



Remember when your opinion mattered... me neither.

:glugglug

SleazyDream 12-20-2004 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by pussyluver
It would take choker a hell of a long time to catch up to all the nasty stuff Sleazy has said on the board.

Dre is right, not our call in the end.


i stand behind EVERY single statement I've ever made on this board. I'm made some wrong ones and apologied for them and owned up to them in the past, and I don't deny I've done so.

MonsterCock 12-20-2004 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream
I recognised maybe 2 people in this thread - choker must be working very hard on his icq right now with his clients.


here's the reason that I see.

My comment was RUDE - I admit that. It;s GFY for fucks sake - read the God damn url. It pulled at his heart and disgusted him and others but it WASN'T liable. It was designed to wake him up about the STUPIDITY of posting a video with the full face of his 12 year old daughter on GFY - an ADULT webmaster board loaded with nude sexual pictures. It was no different than the people who said they couldn't wait for the olsen twins to turn 18 to see the nude photos. It wasn't liable.

Calling me a Pedo REPEATLY was liable, my comment was not about his daughter NOW, it was a speculation about her WHEN she turns legal, 6 years from now. A pedo would have made a comment about her NOW. Choker called me repeatadly a Pedo is liable and shows his real true stupidity.

I pray when the idiot cools down and looks at this ratinally he wakes up to this fact that his comments were liable and wrong and dangerous to my and his reputation.


Personally I think Choker is a good guy with a great business but just really stupid in some personal things. I don't want to see him banned for life - I'd be more than content with just a one week suspension - a cool off period, but I'm not the one who makes those decisions. I hope that having a week to think about his LIABLE comments will allow him to see the light.


Did you post this just to check if you were banned?

WarChild 12-20-2004 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream
I recognised maybe 2 people in this thread - choker must be working very hard on his icq right now with his clients.


here's the reason that I see.

My comment was RUDE - I admit that. It;s GFY for fucks sake - read the God damn url. It pulled at his heart and disgusted him and others but it WASN'T liable. It was designed to wake him up about the STUPIDITY of posting a video with the full face of his 12 year old daughter on GFY - an ADULT webmaster board loaded with nude sexual pictures. It was no different than the people who said they couldn't wait for the olsen twins to turn 18 to see the nude photos. It wasn't liable.

Calling me a Pedo REPEATLY was liable, my comment was not about his daughter NOW, it was a speculation about her WHEN she turns legal, 6 years from now. A pedo would have made a comment about her NOW. Choker called me repeatadly a Pedo is liable and shows his real true stupidity.

I pray when the idiot cools down and looks at this ratinally he wakes up to this fact that his comments were liable and wrong and dangerous to my and his reputation.


Personally I think Choker is a good guy with a great business but just really stupid in some personal things. I don't want to see him banned for life - I'd be more than content with just a one week suspension - a cool off period, but I'm not the one who makes those decisions. I hope that having a week to think about his LIABLE comments will allow him to see the light.

Libel not liable. At least you knew it wasn't slander. Half marks there.

Mr Pheer 12-20-2004 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream
I recognised maybe 2 people in this thread - choker must be working very hard on his icq right now with his clients.


here's the reason that I see.

My comment was RUDE - I admit that. It;s GFY for fucks sake - read the God damn url. It pulled at his heart and disgusted him and others but it WASN'T liable. It was designed to wake him up about the STUPIDITY of posting a video with the full face of his 12 year old daughter on GFY - an ADULT webmaster board loaded with nude sexual pictures. It was no different than the people who said they couldn't wait for the olsen twins to turn 18 to see the nude photos. It wasn't liable.

Calling me a Pedo REPEATLY was liable, my comment was not about his daughter NOW, it was a speculation about her WHEN she turns legal, 6 years from now. A pedo would have made a comment about her NOW. Choker called me repeatadly a Pedo is liable and shows his real true stupidity.

I pray when the idiot cools down and looks at this ratinally he wakes up to this fact that his comments were liable and wrong and dangerous to my and his reputation.


Personally I think Choker is a good guy with a great business but just really stupid in some personal things. I don't want to see him banned for life - I'd be more than content with just a one week suspension - a cool off period, but I'm not the one who makes those decisions. I hope that having a week to think about his LIABLE comments will allow him to see the light.

Did you mean LIBEL or LIABLE?

Rebecca Love 12-20-2004 11:07 PM

I plead the 5th on my vote!:1orglaugh :1orglaugh But I do agree, if one goes, both should go.

Chris 12-20-2004 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by WarChild
Libel not liable. At least you knew it wasn't slander. Half marks there.
:helpme
Oh no he didnt * snaps fingers *

this is one for the ages

theking 12-20-2004 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream
i stand behind EVERY single statement I've ever made on this board.
Well...there it is people...straight from the horse's...err hog's...mouth. Confirmation that he is an "idiot".

WarChild 12-20-2004 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JupZChris
:helpme
Oh no he didnt * snaps fingers *

this is one for the ages

I don't normally spend much time pointing out spelling mistakes when people can't even master the very basics of their native language.

However, if somebody is going to make a post making a big deal out of a word, using it over and over and even all in capital letters, they should at least be using the right word.

SleazyDream 12-20-2004 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rebecca Love
I plead the 5th on my vote!:1orglaugh :1orglaugh But I do agree, if one goes, both should go.
I think i just LOST a lot of respect for you. I can't fucking stand people who don't have a god damn clue about what they are talkign about. do you mind QUANTIFYING THAT? - GFY is full of rude comments all the time. Accusing someone of being a PEDO is another matter.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 12-20-2004 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream
I think i just LOST a lot of respect for you. I can't fucking stand people who don't have a god damn clue about what they are talkign about. do you mind QUANTIFYING THAT? - GFY is full of rude comments all the time. Accusing someone of being a PEDO is another matter.
And asking someone there kid gonna be a pornstar is OK?

SleazyDream 12-20-2004 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AlienQ
And asking someone there kid gonna be a pornstar is OK?

read url


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123