The #1 Reason to Vote for Kerry
 

Beyond all the bullshit promises about jobs, war, taxes and health care, here is the #1 reason why everyone who works in our industry needs to vote for Kerry:

In the next four years the acting President will be filling up to even three Supreme Court Justice positions. It has been 10 years since the last appointment, an unprecedented time period. Most likely to retire are Stevens, Rehnquist and O'Conner. Bush has made it clear with his Court of Appeals appointees that he plans to nominate conservative candidates.

Look at the history of the COPA and you will see why this is so critical for us. COPA narrowly escaped passage with a 5-4 vote in July. Stevens was on our side of that case. The Department of Justice has indicated that they will bring another version of COPA and it is likely that this issue will be revisited in the next 4 years.

On top of that specific case, in the next four years the Justices will also be looking at alot of issues that revolve around freedom of speech, the limits of police and state powers and church-state relations, all of which have an impact on our industry.

Do not sit idle while your future is being decided, this November election will allow the winner to mold the highest Court in the USA and will have a lasting impact for decades to come.

The main reason is to not re-elect bush !

Agreed!

Very good point , people dont think about that.

Kerry is going to win. I've sent them money and you should see the ground roots machine they have working. Its blowing away the Republicans.

so fucking true

you better form some shells and send more because they'll need it.

bush 04.

thats a really strong point

damm straight he is...


sure it's gonna be close but George needs to start job hunting....

end misery, vote for Kerry :thumbsup

Not gonna be close. Gonna be a larger margin than Reagan's win over Carter.

You just watch.

Anyone who works in adult and votes for Bush should have his head examined. Whoever you are, please come out of the woodwork and tell me why you would support Bush. I really want to know.

The only reason Bush will win has to be because he is cheating.

Not sure who in their right mind would want 'Bushit' for 4 more years??


Open your eyes peeps.. Bush sucks.
Check this url
http://www.uuforum.org/deficit.htm
(Maybe Camchicks can hotlink this sucker for me again ;-)


If you still continue to vote for Bush after seeing that url, you're on crack..and people like you shouldn't vote since it appears it's too much for you to handle.

I'm definitely interested in seeing what Kerry can do for us.
He is very powerful and has history to back it up.

Go Kerry

Kerry all the way. I've always voted democrat

Unfortunately most people here are rednecks, kids and idiots. Everything you said is true but don't expect people here to change their vote.

I like kerry

Everybody who had seen the developements in the States in the last 4 years from an European view can't understand why anybody (especially in the adult business) even considers voting for Bush. Look at the Dollar Exchange Rate, the biggest deficit a Country ever had build in only 4 years, the WMD bullshit(in every other country this had resulted in an impeachment), and what I was most upset about: to lower the pay of soldiers going to IRAK for the U.S.

If you want to see the last two US Processors vanish, go vote for Bush. (But search yourself another job before :-) )

I'll debate the issues with rednecks, kids and idiots because they are all entitled to vote. I might not change their minds but I'd sure like a chance to try.

Cmon Bush backers, lets hear the reasons.

I really expected to see pictures of his daughters in this thread.

This thread is useless without pictures.

Good luck man!

AGAIN, since the senate confirms the nominees, and 30% of the current senate seats are up for re-election this November, if you're really concerned about who gets in the supreme court over the next 4 years, PAY ATTENTION TO YOUR LOCAL SENATORS AND VOTE FOR/AGAINST THEM 11/2!!

i would vote for kerry if i was allowed to...

:thumbsup :thumbsup


I've been working on a few myself...

i tend to vote republican and i dont see any reason to vote for bush.

Great post scoreman. Kerry in 04.

you're totally not alone on that one...

The Senate only can confirm or deny someone proposed by the President. Lets start at the top.

Bush pulled out his ancient comment last night when asked about Roe V Wade. He will not use a litmus test when choosing a supreme court nominee.

Do people think that means he'll use a random number generator to choose a nominee? lol :)

AGAIN?

The nomination of Supreme Court justices come from the Executive branch. The Senate is not in a position to confirm what is not offered.

I do not want a situation where the Executive branch gets proactive in deal making with Senators to get Mr Conservative Candidate confirmed. This has always been the case in Washington and you can expect that if Bush wins, he will be cutting deals and doling out the Pork to get his nominations confirmed even if the Senate moves to a much stronger Democrat position.

amen

I'm afraid I can't vote, but I fully second you!

I don't get your point.


what is your reason to vote Rebublican?

TheJimmy, I'm interested to know your reasons too..

This thread needs to be pinned:glugglug

because id rather vote for someone whos for training programs rather then entitlements(handouts). this is a hole the deomcrats have dug themselves into in hopes of get the minority vote. they endorse these so called minority leaders who tell their selected group that the world doesnt want them to succeed and they shouldnt even try and just live off the system which is why they are stuck in a never ending loop. democrats basic outline is raise taxes so we can give it to people without money instead of investing it into training programs to get these people jobs. teach a man to fish... blah blah blah...
im also against all these liberal actions like paying for government employees to have sex changes and having a gay,lesbian, and transexual war memorial instead of one that represents all troops. i guess i shouldnt live in california, the breeding ground of liberal morans. a common misconception is that all republicans are bible freaks who dictate their lives on the bible. couldnt be further from the truth in my case. i just dont think its right taking more of my money to give to people who are in this country illegally and supporting their outragious family who have children for the sole purpose of increasing their government checks. doubling college tuition so more "poor" kids can signup and go the required 2 weeks, receieve their check, and quit. im just sick if the bullshit.

I agree with you on that.
The dems won't be able to block and filibuster a supreme court nominee the way they've done with the appointments to the circuit and appeals courts.
A vacancy on the supreme court will generate way too much negative press if the dems use stalling tactics.

If as projected the republicans keep control of the senate they'll have the votes to ram through another Scalia and Clarence Thomas.
Then there will be hell to pay for our industry, civil liberties in general, and for people's RIGHT TO PRIVACY, which is arguably the most important issue the court will have to deal with in the next decade.

:2 cents:

I sent the Kerry campaign money also and I hope all the other big talkers on this board have put there money where their mouths are as well. This is too important to us for Kerry to loose:thumbsup

You sure you are from Illinois?:helpme

For the record Bill Clinton campaigned on welfare reform in 1992....signed it into law, and Kerry voted for it.
2 year cap on benefits, job training programs etc etc.

I find it ironic that the same people who want to take away a 16 year old girl's right to have an abortion are the same people that want to throw her and the newborn baby out on the street because she had to drop out of school to take care of the baby and has no job skills.

If you really want to get people off the dole then let's stop all the corporate welfare and agriculture subsidies that your party votes for every year. (We spend ALOT more money on that than we do on AFDC)

:2 cents:

I'm a registered Republican who saved a LOT of money on taxes with George W. Bush the last 4 years. With that thought in the back of my mind, I will be voting for Sen. John Kerry in November because there are more important things in life than money.

this is the stance i hate "I find it ironic that the same people who want to take away a 16 year old girl's right to have an abortion are the same people that want to throw her and the newborn baby out on the street because she had to drop out of school to take care of the baby and has no job skills." wheres the accountability of these people and their parents? none. their parents screw up and they destroy their life and im responsable to pick up the tab?
thats why i said i tend to vote republican. i dont agree with all republicans nor vote R everytime. its true clinton took a great step in the right direction, but he's a rare occurrence and the only one democrats can point to when the welfare issue is brought up. what you dont know is there are loopholes that they refuse to fix. 2 year cap doesnt exist, where they can quit the program for 3weeks and rejoin and have a fresh start. they arent allowed to add new children they have while on the program, but again they can quit for 3 weeks and rejoin and add that child. i dont want to take away abortion rights, which again is why i said i TEND to vote republican. maybe instead of providing them with abortions and letting them use a child as an excuse to fail, we should invest in prevention. these people have no accountability when it comes to things of this nature. this is why i dislike labels, where people think if you vote republican that means your a bible thumper who does everything a book writen by man says and agree with everything people in the party you tend to vote with do. it just isnt the case.

Could you please provide a newslink(s) detailing where the government has paid for such or which democrats are supporting measures to do so? I'm usually very proficient at pulling things up from Google but seem to be having a problem with this one.
Well DUH... if someone had a thing against homosexuals they wouldn't move near Castro Street; if they hated drunks they wouldn't move to the French Quarter...come to the Bible belt, the cost of living's lower and it's good ole boys all around. They don't have a lot of that queer stuff that's obviously bugging you:winkwink:
Must not be far from the truth for enough people since GW made it a big issue last night, an obvious effort to rally the church based campaign movement that is sweeping the country.
Restrict people who defraud any program from eligibility from any other government program (whether it be state/federal or local) for a set period after restitution. Instead of giving students checks, cover their expenses on paper. There needs to be a public higher education system for those financially unable to afford Ivy League schools or even community college. Society benefits as a whole when it's citizens are educated.