![]() |
This 'flip-flop' shit got old.. Any other actual arguments against Kerry?
tell me
|
Bush hears the voice of the almighty
|
I just think they're both douches :)
|
Quote:
|
He's adamantly against outsourcing American jobs to foreign labor yet his own fuckin wife has 57 (no pun intended) of her 80 ketchup factories overseas, using foreign labor.
|
Quote:
|
I don't like the fact that he is very rich
|
Quote:
|
Oh who cares, we're all doomed bush is going to win anyway.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The guy obviously has a character problem. He'll say anything to convince people to vote for him. He doesnt actually have to believe what he saying or intend on doing anything that he says he'll just say it... Just imagine that he is elected he tells the UN one thing about how he feels on an issue then decides to do something different? How is that going to play? If the flip-flopping was just over some gun laws or whatever it would be one thing. But every issue he has contradicting views on. And on one of our most important issues the Iraq War, hes had like 8 opinions... This gives me the impression he isnt honest, sincere, or has the courage to be the leader of this country. He started his campaign that he was a war hero... Well it turns out he did alot of dishonerable things during and after the war. Only after he realized he couldnt keep on lieing about it did he stop talking about it? He never once explained what he did and why he did it. Or even attempt to apologize about it. Again showing me that he is not honest, sincere, or does he have the courage to be the leader of this great country. Those are reasons not to vote for him? How about is there any reasons to vote for him? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
that sounds like a double standard to me. |
Quote:
|
There is nothing that the Bush supporters can say about Kerry that cannot be said about Bush himself. End of story. Vote for whoever the hell you want to, it's your future.
ps: Downtime is a moron. |
The truth is that a leader who cannot adjust to the changes in a situation is a fool. Hence modifing one's positions (ie: flip flopping is not necesarily a bad thing).
Bush is just so dangerous that he should not be re-elected. He echoes to many of the traits of the very people he hunts. He hears messages from god and acts on them, I wonder who else makes the same claim. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He has not apologized since he has nothing to apologize for. |
Quote:
You're talking about a worldwide company that has been around for 140 years. Of course they are going to have factories in other countries. How stupid are you? |
I seen Kerry on tv with his "i support the second ammendment" bullshit with a gun in his hand... flat out fucking complete lie.. it takes an act of god to get a permit in this state(mass) and you have to report to more state agencys then a sex offender if you move. Not to mention your mug shot and finger prints are sent to the criminal history board for owning a gun
http://www.citizensfortruth.com/images/kerryban.jpg Can you spot him? The guy says whatever he thinks people want to hear at that moment. Lie or not. It really fucking sucks that there is only 2 fucking options.. it's like choosing if you want to die from cancer or aids. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Do you think 100% of the World's ketchup is used in the USA? 70%+ of their factories are in the US, I'm sure they export a good chunk of that. Do you understand what outsourcing is? I swear it's like you suckers don't even think for a second before spitting out talking points. |
I was debating with my friend and she said she is going to vote Bush and not Kerry because Bush according to her is for "security" while Kerry is not, and because Bush is more experienced. She thinks that everyone wants to bomb the US and she's more in favor of security I guess.. She would rather be more secure but lose personal liberties.
Someone counter argue this so I can use your arguments against my friend and win next time we argue, I'm not too much into politics so couldn't think of a good rebuttal. Rebutal this : - Bush is more experienced than Kerry - Bush is for security And I'll use your arguments next time we bring this up again. |
First of all, the problem with oursourcing is when you fire an American to employ someone cheaper overseas. Building a ketchup factory in the country where you are going to sell the damn ketchup just makes sense.
I know John Kerry doesn't run Heinz. Why the hell should it matter how a company his wife is connected to has been run for the last century? I am pretty sure Theresa Heinz-Kerry doesn't run the company either, by the way. |
Quote:
Photograph of John Kerry meeting with Comrade Do Muoi, General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam. Photo is displayed in the War Remnants Museum (formerly the "War Crimes Museum") in Saigon. |
|
Quote:
Kerry is not against security. He just isn't as ignorant or unilateral as Bush when it comes to how he would bring it. Remember also that Kerry has no lack of experience... Bush was a failed minor oil exec. Kerry has been a successful Senator for quite a while. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.nrapvf.org/kerry/default.aspx |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Research what " outsourcing " is :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.americanthinker.com/artic...rticle_id=3778 |
Quote:
Here is more..... from a non_NRA source. http://washingtontimes.com/op-ed/200...0156-4833r.htm |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123