Europe is spiritually bankrupt
 

http://www.time.com/time/europe/maga...457339,00.html

:(

shut the fuck up, you are on my ignore list so i dont know what you said, but shut the fuck up

Shut up retard

Which is to be considered a good thing!
kinda tired of being force fed hollywoods religion.
if i don't hear the phrase "god" in another series i'll be on top of the world

it's a shame the relgious are so intolerant of everything that is not a mirror copy of their beliefs...

it's a shame that everyone is so intolerant of intolerant people...

"The reason the world is so fucked up is because we're undergoing evolution. And the reason our institutions, our traditional religions are all crumbling is because they're no longer relevant. So it's time for us to create a new philosophy and perhaps even a new religion." -- Bill Hicks

nice quote

I think here people are more spiritually bankrupt, they just put on the I believe in God show here better.

What did boobmaster do to get all this love? http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/...ticons6/23.gif

He waste our air ;)

Evolution is a lie and MR. Hicks is a secular humanist/atheist. Evolution is IMPOSSIBLE. See sig.

I know, like 200 other ppl on your ignore list ;)

But i know you read it anyway ;) thats the funny part ;)

You don't understand your own quote. Evolution is a process that has been observed many times in nature, it has VERY strong evidence.

I bet your mate Hoyle even believes in evolution. What he's suggesting is that the very first instance of life is a very very unlikely occurrence, that's got little to do with evolution.

Very true.

And boobmaster the evolution that he was talking about in that quote was not physical evolution.

How can so much sense come out of someone in germany?
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

You are correct. The quote in my sig has to do with abiogenesis, not with evolution as a process. However, the VAST MAJORITY of evolutionists believe in abiogenesis. Hoyle was pointing out that this is impossible.

I agree that there is significant evidence for evolution as a process, specifically MICROevolution. There is comparatively little evidence supporting MACROevolution. The fossil record bares that out.

I love my ignore list

He used the word 'mate', so maybe he's an imposter. MATE is so Aussie/British.

:1orglaugh

I thought you were going to sell me one of your sites. I guess you changed your mind.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Are you for fuckin' real or the GFY village idiot?

well "little" evidence for macro-evolution is better than 0 evidence for creationism. :-)

I'd be happy to debate evolution with you all day.

why don't you do it somewhere else, no one else gives a fuck

:1orglaugh

The complexity of the simplest living organism argues for design. The complexity in nature argues for design. The dependencies in nature argue for design. Evidence for a creator is EVERYWHERE. Open your eyes, you blind fool.

Really? One of the most significant questions to face mankind and you don't give a fuck? You are a simple man, aren't you?

jesus christ, another fuckin' creationist.........

go watch "Inherit the Wind"........maybe you'll learn something about the blindness of religious intolerance based on myth....

the height of hilarity...........a creationist attempting, feebly of course, to use science to justify his/her mythology

If you say so.

... and what are your credentials? Where did you get your degree?

.........is it any surprise to anyone that your this blind, myopic republican who follows around this administration like a lamb to the slaughter?

you're a contradiction............what are you doing in this industry anyways? you should be running some crazy religious blog somewhere instead.

:2 cents:

... again, I ask you, what are your academic credentials?

That's pretty poor logic. What designed the designer then?

a billion years of oceans of primoridal soup, volatile environment, and you end up with sub-microsopic virii and perhaps some algae.
Not particularly complex at all.

boobmaster, i've taken note of your posts in the past, mostly so i can laugh my ass off at someone like you who is so moronic in his belief systems. that'd be the day that i'm even baited into a serious discussion with a right-wing fanatic like you are.

seriously, maybe it'll take the DOJ, that you know and serve so well, to come after you to snap you out of your fog. and thats the last I'll address an issue that is a waste of everyone's time because the question has been scientifically answered adequately a long time ago. but you creationists refuse to admit this evidence and its not up to me to educate you on this matter. a complete waste of time............as if you'd listen anyways.

so :321GFY

Noone, because he is OUTSIDE of space and time. Beginnings and endings are only relevant within time.

Life from Nonlife? VERY COMPLEX. Sorry! There was no biotic soup.

you just made my above point for me. how can you argue with someone who makes up bullshit rules like this.............."Because he is outside space and time." You have ventured out of science and into philosophical speculation where "anything goes" because "he is outside of space and time." you're a waste of time.

well that's a nice belief, but that's all it is.

the ocean now is a biotic soup, SORRRRRRRRRRRY. BURN!

This bullshit's been heard 1000 times before and refuted 1000 times before.

:1orglaugh

You guys are wasting your time.

Booby would be denying gravity if the Bible said so.