|
fuck!!! What is up with child porn sites?
I was wondering how sites like pure-l***ta.com stay up? It says they're legal because they display underage children in an artistic manner???
Anyways, did you see their affiliate program: 60% of sign up and 100% recurring, lol, think they shave??? Let's all report them http://bbs.gofuckyourself.com/board/smile.gif [This message has been edited by MattressKing (edited 05-02-2001).] |
Won't do any good MK. As long as they aren't in sexual poses with others blah blah blah, nothing can be done under the law.
We reported a site with graphically written stories of rape on children and even babies and once again, the law says oh well. Written descripts aren't even touched under the little law we have. Ashcroft needs to focus on strenghtening those kind of laws before he ever tries to take on legal porn. ...Wondering if he will attempt to just shovel it all into the same pile to sweep away... |
I totally agree. I bought the domain name xboyx.com about 6 months ago to throw up a pay site...then after mis-typing my own domain, I found that xboysx.com was a kiddie porn site...
Anyone want to buy a domain name? http://bbs.gofuckyourself.com/board/smile.gif Cheers |
if these CP sites advertise their
content in a sexual manner, can't they be shut down? |
Hmmm I dunno Corpsie! We always turn the sites into Helmy at that ASACP.org site tho. They DO email back and tell you the status on the findings at least. Whereas those other report sites never bother to let you know
|
If Im only 16, is it ok for me to post pics of chicks under the age of 18?
Teen to you old farts, is mature pussy for me yo! |
I have never seen a child porn site , so I went to the page MAJIK was talkin about...I almost threw up in disgust!!!
That shit CANT be legal!!! |
i hear you babagirls.... i think that was only the 2nd time i've ever saw it for real. ....and people actually pay for it....
|
The xboysx can not be legal by any means. Sick fuckers!! Where I work they like to stab rape then kill those kind of people and not always in that order!!
|
|
Ok...for those of you who have NOT reported xboysx.com get off your ass and do it plz. The link is below.
http://www.asacp.org/reportsite.html Thankie ------------------
|
why would sunbill put up with this kind of shit ?? And what about the slim that host it over at:
Cove Software Systems Inc (NETBLK-COVE-NET-2) PO Box 2264 Annapolis, MD 21401 US Netname: COVE-NET-2 Netblock: 209.103.160.0 - 209.103.191.255 Coordinator: Shevenell, Mike (MS1417-ARIN) [email protected] 410 268 0935 Record last updated on 23-Feb-2000. Database last updated on 2-May-2001 22:46:59 EDT. Maybe I should use the extra 250GB a day of extra incoming bandwidth that I have to really suck the shit out of all of their domains till they shut it off http://bbs.gofuckyourself.com/board/smile.gif http://bbs.gofuckyourself.com/board/smile.gif http://bbs.gofuckyourself.com/board/smile.gif Tim |
WOW, like you say guys, that shit is just plain wrong. How the hell could someone see that as art. That's for people with sick fucking minds.
Hey, I think that I should stop calling myself an adult webmaster and calling myself an ART webmaster, because I now see that nudity is art, nothing sexual, he he he. [This message has been edited by Slick (edited 05-03-2001).] |
That xboys site isn't shit compared to the insane acts that i have seen. I know of a site that is up right now that shows true child porn, fucking , sucking, crying, etc.
I'd post it but that would probably get me in trouble. I found it searching through the stats of the freehost that i work for. I did report it but so far.. it's still up. |
Fucking rediculous. I swear some people have some serious fucking issues running sites like that...how the hell can they sleep at night?
------------------
|
This gives me an idea....maybe half baked one since I've only had 4-5 hrs of sleep in the past 2 days. But what if all the adult webmasters got together and started an online petition to show that we care about keeping this industry clean and as a result have sites like google, yahoo, etc with links to sites like asacp on their pages. To be honest before I got started in this biz, I was just a regular surfer and not ONCE did I ever see an asacp type link out of years of surfing.
------------------
[This message has been edited by Unriz3n (edited 05-03-2001).] |
Is this site, xboysx for Michael Jackson? http://bbs.gofuckyourself.com/board/wink.gif
Hey all, i'm new here Andy |
*puts helmet and flak jacket on*
Right then, we all know the purpose of sites like that. It is legal CP. As much as I find it distasteful, the owner of the website is adhereing to your laws. Would it be ok if the boys were wearing swimming trunks? How about wet, white swimming trunks? At what stage do you decide what is improper for boys to be depicted wearing? If we decide that boys in swimming trunks are offensive, what do we do with clothes catalogs? Maybe a change in the age of photographing? No-one under 16 maybe photographed and it be displayed as porn, ahem, i mean art. But ok for clothes catalogs - online clothes catalogs would be next - devoted to young peoples clothes. I see little difference in this xboysx site and most of the bikini pages showing 14 and 15 yo girls - both are for the titilation of the perverted. Unfortunately that is why the internet became so popular in the first place, middle-aged computer nerds could swap pictures that were previously nigh on impossible to get a hold of. Do we go back to Victorian extremes of prudishness, when the sight of a lady's ankle was pornographic? Someone in the USA has decided at some stage where the line was to be drawn - that xboysx webmaster is on that line, not over it. |
ok Kat -
Hope you have the helmet and jacket on, cause here it comes. I can't believe that you would compare that site to a JC Penny's swimwear catalog. And yes I think that it is our responsibility to decide what is decent and acceptable standard for our communities. I feel that many people, while maybe not liking the types of sites that I host would not find they overly offensive. But the site that is mention above would be banned without a second thought. I also believe that we have a duty to protect the innocence of our children. I myself have 2 girls, and I won't want them to look at the sites that I host, until mom and I decide that they are old enough to choose for themselves what to view. Much like what we do when censoring tv and music for them. And I would never want to find them depicted on a site like xboysx.com. The main word in adult website is ADULT, not child. Sorry but I feel that xboysx.com is way over the line here, and I for one am willing to do whatever it takes to shut that type of crap down. If that means I pull ton's of bandwidth from the hosts till they shut it off, so be it. Tim |
Hmmm maybe a raft of protest emails from all of us to the hoster would sway the host to boot them off as well as tell us what host they mve to so we can follow them.
Just keep hounding them until they give up on the site. Would be nice to hack their member dbase and email those sickos as well. With a: I Know What You Did Last Winter You Freaking Pervert!! Self Police these sites out of existance!! |
Quote:
I just reported them! ------------------ "We are all porn stars , just some of us are brave enough to do it on film!" http://www.plauder-smilies.de/yellows/kiss2.gif Jamie's Stable |
Tim, i am truly disgusted by pictures depicting minors. Most of the population is.
Pictures of minors will be ogled by perverts, no matter how the pictures are presented - whether it be in the form of degrading filth like xboysx or a clothes catalogue - I am pointing out that both types of viewing are perfectly legal and that no regulation or legislation is going to be brought in that wont be worked around by the perverts that wish to see this. The fact that these young boys are being presented for adult viewing is abhorrent, but legal. Methods of censorship such as draining huge amounts of bandwidth is possible, but it makes your actions no different to the self righteous moralists who wish to see all online porn vanquished. What I wish to know is how we can say that these pictures of young boys naked are less offensive than pictures of them in swimming trunks? I would find the exact same website offensive if those boys were wearing trunks because they are being displayed for the self-gratification of a perveted minority. So, what is the purpose of bikini pages displaying under 16 girls? What is the difference to pictures of young boys? Those pages are also used by perverts for their own pleasure. The laws are written and we try our best to abide by them - some people push their actions to the limit of the law - like xboysx - it is wrong to persecute someone who isn't breaking the law just because you disagree with their (all be it sick) method of earning money. There are many webbies posting here that feel they can't let their friends and family know what their chosen profession is - for fear of being branded a pervert maybe? The general public view the internet with suspicion because of the media hype regarding online porn - moralists do not see any difference in the 'filth' we peddle and the 'filth' as we prceive it - CP. As much as we advertise for bigger adult sites, and that it is legal to film a model of 18 years being anally violated by someones fist, and legal for us to display those images - how are we to say that the suspicious general public aren't correct in their viewpoint? The majority of the general public find that sort of viewing just as disgusting as, if not more than, pictures of naked boys. |
Thank you all for your help! These sick-o's need to be taken out...and a good side effect of it is that if these sick bastards are taken down, I'll be able to use my domain name. I've reported them multiple times, so far nothing has come out of it.
Todd |
Kat, one thing with this site, is that the little boys have hard-ons. I've yet to see a J.C. Penny catalog depict their little boy underwear with the little boy's little penis' fully erect.
Don't get me wrong, I've seen pictures of children in art galleries depected as art, and some of them are very beautiful pieces... But I think that whatever government controls the internet can definatley tell the difference between art and kiddie porn. If you charge $30 per month to see kids with hard-on's...it's not art. Read http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/2256.text.html for a description of child porn. Todd [This message has been edited by Majik (edited 05-03-2001).] |
I'm not familiar with how ASACP (sp?) works, but when you report kiddie porn, it's a good idea to do so anonymously. Why? Here's why:
http://www.greeleytrib.com/article.php?sid=1040 I ran across this article in GloBill's webmaster area among their news items. Pretty scary, huh? BTW, please don't read me as saying NOT to report KP sites, just make sure you don't get burned. "No good deed goes unpunished!" |
Damn UnseenWorld, that's just frickin rediculas. How can some people punish those that are trying to do good. That's just like the few instances with kids in school. I've heard of one story where on kid was talking to the other about killing himself with a knife that he had in his locker and he didn't want him to tell anyone about it. Well, the kid went into the locker, took the knife out and brought it to one of the faculty and guess what happend ??? He got SUSPENDED for having a knife in school when he was trying to save his buddy from killing himself. Talk about FUCKING STUPID !!!
If people are gonna have to start being afraid to do good, this world is gonna turn into a bad place. |
Don't waste your time trying to stop child nudity sites I have tried and you just go round in circles. Most of these sites are working under the non-explicit loophole and the servers are often based in countries where nobody seems to give a shit.
There are 7 major CP-Nude Art sites all running from Russia and the East side. These are supported by a huge network of link lists CJ sites and spammers most of whom also work from Eastern countries. The best weapon against these guys is to make entry into our mainstream traffic flow as difficult as possible. When you find a CP site, list or circle take five minutes and look around the page and its links, you will usually come across blatant misuse of some free host, counter or service. Mail the operator and get it shut down. Tgp?s and list operators should also watch out for the changing links after submission, this is one of their favourite methods of getting traffic from our system. Linking into perfectly legal looking sites is also a method used to hide the blind CP connection. As for Sunbill and the other CP supporting billing systems, they are just as bad as the site operators, mailing them will get no results whatsoever. Good fun ? if you see a CP site with a mailing list entry box, fill it full of shit and hold down the enter key, quite often these guys have taken no precautions to check dupes etc and you might even slow the server for a while http://bbs.gofuckyourself.com/board/smile.gif |
i know exactly how that 'report the CP' story pans out. My friend is a 34 yo mother of 3 doing a children's psychology degree.
When she was on the net, she too came across CP, so took down all the details and handed them in to the local police. She had her laptop confiscated and was held 'assisting police with their enquiries' for half the day. Leave the police to their fuckin coffee and doughnuts. Cretins. |
Gemini =
It won't take much I can tell you. I've got a script that will go thru all of their IP Block and grab emails off of the websites of other people that host with them. I've always found it best to a) let them decide first if they want to take it down b) give them a little nudge by sucking say 1000GB of traffic from them http://bbs.gofuckyourself.com/board/smile.gif and then finally c) emailing their upline pipe provider which in this case looks like gblx.net and to email their customers with the address and ask them if they really want to be hosted with that kind of site. Normally they take option A, sometimes B, and they really hate it when option C comes into play, but they always end up taking it down http://bbs.gofuckyourself.com/board/smile.gif Tim |
How come all of us are at least mildly worried about a DOS (denial of service) attack but none of us know how to initiate one?
I think all these fuckers need to be DOS'ed. Maybe if we figure out how and then take turns volunteering we can shut some of the bastards down!! Just my two cents. ------------------ Uuuuhhhhh... Fuck something anyway... www.myprofilz.com |
Kat
The police have not got a clue when it comes to catching the real CP guys. So often they drag some guy through the courts and make a huge media issue out of it just because he has a few suspect pics on his PC downloaded from some newsgroup. The public of course think this is a major step towards removing CP from the net LOL. As usual the police attack the easy targets so that they can quickly get back to their lazy donut eating lives. |
Unseenworld, NEVER be afraid to use ASACP, Helmy keeps the reporting party anon. They take it from there as if they found it. http://bbs.gofuckyourself.com/board/smile.gif
|
All of your points are valid, but did anybody actually look at the tour on pure-lolita?
Those girls don't look especially young to me, they could all be 18-19-20, easily. What the owner of that site is doing is the same thing the rest of us do, he's offering surfers EXACTLY what they want on his tour. He's got a teen site that is walking closer to the line than most of us. Like it or not there is a market for that stuff. Who knows what's really inside that site. If it's illegal, that's one thing, if not, it's the same as any other teen site. Be careful, you guys are doing some of the same things straight folks do to our industry all the time: not making a distinction between what you think is illegal and what actually is illegal. I'm not defending CP, but be careful, we could be cutting our own throats by reporting semi-legit sites as CP, that gives the moralists an in on our whole industry. |
jimmy 3 way, if you go to through the tour, some look like they're 7-8.
Anyways, are these art drawings of them or something??? I know you said that art of hild porn is displayed at art galleries, but again, that's art. Are these real pics??? |
Matressking - in the UK it is illegal to have even computer created images(scans of drawings or 'drawn' uing Bryce or such-like) of child porn, never mind actual images.
|
jimmy-three-way
That a very valid point as some people take the CP thing a little too far and don't channel enough energy into stopping the real child abusers. Is a 16/17 YO topless girl CP - if so our UK tabloids are CP sellers. |
Quote:
That said, I was actually just making a point that we should be careful. I get complaints all day and 95% of them turn out to be incorrect assumptions, in fact, I even get complaints about sites with 2257 warnings on the first page. So while we certianly don't need CP providers in our industry, we need to be very careful not to give those weasels in Washington any ins on our legit sites. |
after a look at the lolita tour, most look around 16/17 - a couple of dubious pics, but they were face pics.
What we have to be careful of isn't sites like this - they are pictures of girls - young girls/boys getting fucked is kiddie porn - nudity isn't porn. [This message has been edited by Kat (edited 05-03-2001).] |
something that just made me smile..
Parents protect your kids from porn - you must be 18 to enter this site - check out the pop up window. Sometimes I just want to go out and shoot some people. http://www.free-tgp.com |
I just tried xboysx.com and I get a "page cannot be displayed" have you guys gotten the site taken off the net?
Or is it just me? Cool if you did. I'm with whoever posted the rape, and kill the cp'ers. I've got a metal bat I'd like to introduce them too. ------------------ ~Every time I call myself Webmistress, I feel I should be in spike heels with a whip~ KICK ASS content and sponsor Oliver Klozov ~ Quality babes Free Net Pass |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123